Shouldice technique and mesh interposition by Prolene. Preliminary results

Técnica de Shouldice e interposición de malla de Prolene. Resultados preliminares

Pagán Pomar, Alberto - Alvarez Segurado, Cristina - Morón Canis, José Miguel - Fernández Hurtado, Iñigo - Soro Gosalvez, José Antonio

Resumen:

Surgical treatment of inguinal hernia has beenthe object of much controversy which is reflectedhistorically in the deve/opment of mu/tipletechnique's. In the BO's this g9ve way to twotechniques which are clearly above other !treatments according to results. Sho¿ldice'sherniorraphia and interposition of pro/ene meshare at present two techniques which arecompatible, can be performed by the samesurgical team with excellent results which aresimilar to those obtained by groups specializedin the techniques.The aim was to determine reproductabilitycapacity and resu/ts in the same group ofsurgeons. lt is the authors' belief that with verysimilar results with both techniques, the easytechnica/ development of pro/ene mesh /eavesother techniques behind


El tratamiento quirúrgico de la hernia inguinal hasido objeto de múltiples controversias con eldesarrollo de distintas técnicas. En la década delos ochenta esta controversia ha dado paso a laimplantación de dos técnicas que por susresultados se han distanciado claramente deotras formas de tratamiento. La herniorrafia deShouldice y la interposición de malla de pro/eneson en la actualidad dos técnicas compatibles ycon unos resultados excelentes a largo plazo.Nuestro objetivo era determinar la capacidad dereproducción y los resultados en un mismogrupo de cirujanos. Concluimos que teniendoambas resultados muy similares, el fácildesarrollo técnico de la malla de pro/enedesplaza a las demás técnicas.


Detalles Bibliográficos
1999
hernia inguinal
cirugía
inguinal hernia
surgery
Español
Sociedad de Cirugía del Uruguay
Revista Cirugía del Uruguay
https://revista.scu.org.uy/index.php/cir_urug/article/view/4372
Acceso abierto
_version_ 1815772783665217536
author Pagán Pomar, Alberto
author2 Alvarez Segurado, Cristina
Morón Canis, José Miguel
Fernández Hurtado, Iñigo
Soro Gosalvez, José Antonio
author2_role author
author
author
author
author_facet Pagán Pomar, Alberto
Alvarez Segurado, Cristina
Morón Canis, José Miguel
Fernández Hurtado, Iñigo
Soro Gosalvez, José Antonio
author_role author
collection Revista Cirugía del Uruguay
dc.creator.none.fl_str_mv Pagán Pomar, Alberto
Alvarez Segurado, Cristina
Morón Canis, José Miguel
Fernández Hurtado, Iñigo
Soro Gosalvez, José Antonio
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 1999-04-20
dc.description.abstract.none.fl_txt_mv Surgical treatment of inguinal hernia has beenthe object of much controversy which is reflectedhistorically in the deve/opment of mu/tipletechnique's. In the BO's this g9ve way to twotechniques which are clearly above other !treatments according to results. Sho¿ldice'sherniorraphia and interposition of pro/ene meshare at present two techniques which arecompatible, can be performed by the samesurgical team with excellent results which aresimilar to those obtained by groups specializedin the techniques.The aim was to determine reproductabilitycapacity and resu/ts in the same group ofsurgeons. lt is the authors' belief that with verysimilar results with both techniques, the easytechnica/ development of pro/ene mesh /eavesother techniques behind
El tratamiento quirúrgico de la hernia inguinal hasido objeto de múltiples controversias con eldesarrollo de distintas técnicas. En la década delos ochenta esta controversia ha dado paso a laimplantación de dos técnicas que por susresultados se han distanciado claramente deotras formas de tratamiento. La herniorrafia deShouldice y la interposición de malla de pro/eneson en la actualidad dos técnicas compatibles ycon unos resultados excelentes a largo plazo.Nuestro objetivo era determinar la capacidad dereproducción y los resultados en un mismogrupo de cirujanos. Concluimos que teniendoambas resultados muy similares, el fácildesarrollo técnico de la malla de pro/enedesplaza a las demás técnicas.
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
dc.identifier.none.fl_str_mv https://revista.scu.org.uy/index.php/cir_urug/article/view/4372
dc.language.iso.none.fl_str_mv spa
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Sociedad de Cirugía del Uruguay
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv https://revista.scu.org.uy/index.php/cir_urug/article/view/4372/4111
dc.rights.none.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Revista Cirugía del Uruguay; Vol. 69 No. 3-4 (1999): Cirugía del Uruguay; 204-207
Revista Cirugía del Uruguay; Vol. 69 Núm. 3-4 (1999): Cirugía del Uruguay; 204-207
1688-1281
reponame:Revista Cirugía del Uruguay
instname:Sociedad de Cirugía del Uruguay
instacron:Sociedad de Cirugía del Uruguay
dc.subject.none.fl_str_mv hernia inguinal
cirugía
inguinal hernia
surgery
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Shouldice technique and mesh interposition by Prolene. Preliminary results
Técnica de Shouldice e interposición de malla de Prolene. Resultados preliminares
dc.type.none.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
dc.type.version.none.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
description Surgical treatment of inguinal hernia has beenthe object of much controversy which is reflectedhistorically in the deve/opment of mu/tipletechnique's. In the BO's this g9ve way to twotechniques which are clearly above other !treatments according to results. Sho¿ldice'sherniorraphia and interposition of pro/ene meshare at present two techniques which arecompatible, can be performed by the samesurgical team with excellent results which aresimilar to those obtained by groups specializedin the techniques.The aim was to determine reproductabilitycapacity and resu/ts in the same group ofsurgeons. lt is the authors' belief that with verysimilar results with both techniques, the easytechnica/ development of pro/ene mesh /eavesother techniques behind
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
format article
id SCU_1_edd23ed53d03f32692fa496f2d595e8e
instacron_str Sociedad de Cirugía del Uruguay
institution Sociedad de Cirugía del Uruguay
instname_str Sociedad de Cirugía del Uruguay
language spa
network_acronym_str SCU_1
network_name_str Revista Cirugía del Uruguay
oai_identifier_str oai:ojs2.revista.scu.org.uy:article/4372
publishDate 1999
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Sociedad de Cirugía del Uruguay
reponame_str Revista Cirugía del Uruguay
repository.mail.fl_str_mv
repository.name.fl_str_mv Revista Cirugía del Uruguay - Sociedad de Cirugía del Uruguay
repository_id_str
spelling Shouldice technique and mesh interposition by Prolene. Preliminary resultsTécnica de Shouldice e interposición de malla de Prolene. Resultados preliminaresPagán Pomar, AlbertoAlvarez Segurado, CristinaMorón Canis, José MiguelFernández Hurtado, IñigoSoro Gosalvez, José Antoniohernia inguinalcirugíainguinal herniasurgerySurgical treatment of inguinal hernia has beenthe object of much controversy which is reflectedhistorically in the deve/opment of mu/tipletechnique's. In the BO's this g9ve way to twotechniques which are clearly above other !treatments according to results. Sho¿ldice'sherniorraphia and interposition of pro/ene meshare at present two techniques which arecompatible, can be performed by the samesurgical team with excellent results which aresimilar to those obtained by groups specializedin the techniques.The aim was to determine reproductabilitycapacity and resu/ts in the same group ofsurgeons. lt is the authors' belief that with verysimilar results with both techniques, the easytechnica/ development of pro/ene mesh /eavesother techniques behindEl tratamiento quirúrgico de la hernia inguinal hasido objeto de múltiples controversias con eldesarrollo de distintas técnicas. En la década delos ochenta esta controversia ha dado paso a laimplantación de dos técnicas que por susresultados se han distanciado claramente deotras formas de tratamiento. La herniorrafia deShouldice y la interposición de malla de pro/eneson en la actualidad dos técnicas compatibles ycon unos resultados excelentes a largo plazo.Nuestro objetivo era determinar la capacidad dereproducción y los resultados en un mismogrupo de cirujanos. Concluimos que teniendoambas resultados muy similares, el fácildesarrollo técnico de la malla de pro/enedesplaza a las demás técnicas.Sociedad de Cirugía del Uruguay1999-04-20info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionapplication/pdfhttps://revista.scu.org.uy/index.php/cir_urug/article/view/4372Revista Cirugía del Uruguay; Vol. 69 No. 3-4 (1999): Cirugía del Uruguay; 204-207Revista Cirugía del Uruguay; Vol. 69 Núm. 3-4 (1999): Cirugía del Uruguay; 204-2071688-1281reponame:Revista Cirugía del Uruguayinstname:Sociedad de Cirugía del Uruguayinstacron:Sociedad de Cirugía del Uruguayspahttps://revista.scu.org.uy/index.php/cir_urug/article/view/4372/4111info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess2021-04-20T03:24:55Zoai:ojs2.revista.scu.org.uy:article/4372Privadahttps://scu.org.uy/https://revista.scu.org.uy/index.php/cir_urug/oaiUruguayopendoar:2021-04-20T03:24:55Revista Cirugía del Uruguay - Sociedad de Cirugía del Uruguayfalse
spellingShingle Shouldice technique and mesh interposition by Prolene. Preliminary results
Pagán Pomar, Alberto
hernia inguinal
cirugía
inguinal hernia
surgery
status_str publishedVersion
title Shouldice technique and mesh interposition by Prolene. Preliminary results
title_full Shouldice technique and mesh interposition by Prolene. Preliminary results
title_fullStr Shouldice technique and mesh interposition by Prolene. Preliminary results
title_full_unstemmed Shouldice technique and mesh interposition by Prolene. Preliminary results
title_short Shouldice technique and mesh interposition by Prolene. Preliminary results
title_sort Shouldice technique and mesh interposition by Prolene. Preliminary results
topic hernia inguinal
cirugía
inguinal hernia
surgery
url https://revista.scu.org.uy/index.php/cir_urug/article/view/4372