Shouldice technique and mesh interposition by Prolene. Preliminary results
Técnica de Shouldice e interposición de malla de Prolene. Resultados preliminares
Resumen:
Surgical treatment of inguinal hernia has beenthe object of much controversy which is reflectedhistorically in the deve/opment of mu/tipletechnique's. In the BO's this g9ve way to twotechniques which are clearly above other !treatments according to results. Sho¿ldice'sherniorraphia and interposition of pro/ene meshare at present two techniques which arecompatible, can be performed by the samesurgical team with excellent results which aresimilar to those obtained by groups specializedin the techniques.The aim was to determine reproductabilitycapacity and resu/ts in the same group ofsurgeons. lt is the authors' belief that with verysimilar results with both techniques, the easytechnica/ development of pro/ene mesh /eavesother techniques behind
El tratamiento quirúrgico de la hernia inguinal hasido objeto de múltiples controversias con eldesarrollo de distintas técnicas. En la década delos ochenta esta controversia ha dado paso a laimplantación de dos técnicas que por susresultados se han distanciado claramente deotras formas de tratamiento. La herniorrafia deShouldice y la interposición de malla de pro/eneson en la actualidad dos técnicas compatibles ycon unos resultados excelentes a largo plazo.Nuestro objetivo era determinar la capacidad dereproducción y los resultados en un mismogrupo de cirujanos. Concluimos que teniendoambas resultados muy similares, el fácildesarrollo técnico de la malla de pro/enedesplaza a las demás técnicas.
1999 | |
hernia inguinal cirugía inguinal hernia surgery |
|
Español | |
Sociedad de Cirugía del Uruguay | |
Revista Cirugía del Uruguay | |
https://revista.scu.org.uy/index.php/cir_urug/article/view/4372 | |
Acceso abierto |
_version_ | 1815772783665217536 |
---|---|
author | Pagán Pomar, Alberto |
author2 | Alvarez Segurado, Cristina Morón Canis, José Miguel Fernández Hurtado, Iñigo Soro Gosalvez, José Antonio |
author2_role | author author author author |
author_facet | Pagán Pomar, Alberto Alvarez Segurado, Cristina Morón Canis, José Miguel Fernández Hurtado, Iñigo Soro Gosalvez, José Antonio |
author_role | author |
collection | Revista Cirugía del Uruguay |
dc.creator.none.fl_str_mv | Pagán Pomar, Alberto Alvarez Segurado, Cristina Morón Canis, José Miguel Fernández Hurtado, Iñigo Soro Gosalvez, José Antonio |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv | 1999-04-20 |
dc.description.abstract.none.fl_txt_mv | Surgical treatment of inguinal hernia has beenthe object of much controversy which is reflectedhistorically in the deve/opment of mu/tipletechnique's. In the BO's this g9ve way to twotechniques which are clearly above other !treatments according to results. Sho¿ldice'sherniorraphia and interposition of pro/ene meshare at present two techniques which arecompatible, can be performed by the samesurgical team with excellent results which aresimilar to those obtained by groups specializedin the techniques.The aim was to determine reproductabilitycapacity and resu/ts in the same group ofsurgeons. lt is the authors' belief that with verysimilar results with both techniques, the easytechnica/ development of pro/ene mesh /eavesother techniques behind El tratamiento quirúrgico de la hernia inguinal hasido objeto de múltiples controversias con eldesarrollo de distintas técnicas. En la década delos ochenta esta controversia ha dado paso a laimplantación de dos técnicas que por susresultados se han distanciado claramente deotras formas de tratamiento. La herniorrafia deShouldice y la interposición de malla de pro/eneson en la actualidad dos técnicas compatibles ycon unos resultados excelentes a largo plazo.Nuestro objetivo era determinar la capacidad dereproducción y los resultados en un mismogrupo de cirujanos. Concluimos que teniendoambas resultados muy similares, el fácildesarrollo técnico de la malla de pro/enedesplaza a las demás técnicas. |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv | application/pdf |
dc.identifier.none.fl_str_mv | https://revista.scu.org.uy/index.php/cir_urug/article/view/4372 |
dc.language.iso.none.fl_str_mv | spa |
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv | Sociedad de Cirugía del Uruguay |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv | https://revista.scu.org.uy/index.php/cir_urug/article/view/4372/4111 |
dc.rights.none.fl_str_mv | info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv | Revista Cirugía del Uruguay; Vol. 69 No. 3-4 (1999): Cirugía del Uruguay; 204-207 Revista Cirugía del Uruguay; Vol. 69 Núm. 3-4 (1999): Cirugía del Uruguay; 204-207 1688-1281 reponame:Revista Cirugía del Uruguay instname:Sociedad de Cirugía del Uruguay instacron:Sociedad de Cirugía del Uruguay |
dc.subject.none.fl_str_mv | hernia inguinal cirugía inguinal hernia surgery |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv | Shouldice technique and mesh interposition by Prolene. Preliminary results Técnica de Shouldice e interposición de malla de Prolene. Resultados preliminares |
dc.type.none.fl_str_mv | info:eu-repo/semantics/article info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion |
dc.type.version.none.fl_str_mv | info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion |
description | Surgical treatment of inguinal hernia has beenthe object of much controversy which is reflectedhistorically in the deve/opment of mu/tipletechnique's. In the BO's this g9ve way to twotechniques which are clearly above other !treatments according to results. Sho¿ldice'sherniorraphia and interposition of pro/ene meshare at present two techniques which arecompatible, can be performed by the samesurgical team with excellent results which aresimilar to those obtained by groups specializedin the techniques.The aim was to determine reproductabilitycapacity and resu/ts in the same group ofsurgeons. lt is the authors' belief that with verysimilar results with both techniques, the easytechnica/ development of pro/ene mesh /eavesother techniques behind |
eu_rights_str_mv | openAccess |
format | article |
id | SCU_1_edd23ed53d03f32692fa496f2d595e8e |
instacron_str | Sociedad de Cirugía del Uruguay |
institution | Sociedad de Cirugía del Uruguay |
instname_str | Sociedad de Cirugía del Uruguay |
language | spa |
network_acronym_str | SCU_1 |
network_name_str | Revista Cirugía del Uruguay |
oai_identifier_str | oai:ojs2.revista.scu.org.uy:article/4372 |
publishDate | 1999 |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv | Sociedad de Cirugía del Uruguay |
reponame_str | Revista Cirugía del Uruguay |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv | |
repository.name.fl_str_mv | Revista Cirugía del Uruguay - Sociedad de Cirugía del Uruguay |
repository_id_str | |
spelling | Shouldice technique and mesh interposition by Prolene. Preliminary resultsTécnica de Shouldice e interposición de malla de Prolene. Resultados preliminaresPagán Pomar, AlbertoAlvarez Segurado, CristinaMorón Canis, José MiguelFernández Hurtado, IñigoSoro Gosalvez, José Antoniohernia inguinalcirugíainguinal herniasurgerySurgical treatment of inguinal hernia has beenthe object of much controversy which is reflectedhistorically in the deve/opment of mu/tipletechnique's. In the BO's this g9ve way to twotechniques which are clearly above other !treatments according to results. Sho¿ldice'sherniorraphia and interposition of pro/ene meshare at present two techniques which arecompatible, can be performed by the samesurgical team with excellent results which aresimilar to those obtained by groups specializedin the techniques.The aim was to determine reproductabilitycapacity and resu/ts in the same group ofsurgeons. lt is the authors' belief that with verysimilar results with both techniques, the easytechnica/ development of pro/ene mesh /eavesother techniques behindEl tratamiento quirúrgico de la hernia inguinal hasido objeto de múltiples controversias con eldesarrollo de distintas técnicas. En la década delos ochenta esta controversia ha dado paso a laimplantación de dos técnicas que por susresultados se han distanciado claramente deotras formas de tratamiento. La herniorrafia deShouldice y la interposición de malla de pro/eneson en la actualidad dos técnicas compatibles ycon unos resultados excelentes a largo plazo.Nuestro objetivo era determinar la capacidad dereproducción y los resultados en un mismogrupo de cirujanos. Concluimos que teniendoambas resultados muy similares, el fácildesarrollo técnico de la malla de pro/enedesplaza a las demás técnicas.Sociedad de Cirugía del Uruguay1999-04-20info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionapplication/pdfhttps://revista.scu.org.uy/index.php/cir_urug/article/view/4372Revista Cirugía del Uruguay; Vol. 69 No. 3-4 (1999): Cirugía del Uruguay; 204-207Revista Cirugía del Uruguay; Vol. 69 Núm. 3-4 (1999): Cirugía del Uruguay; 204-2071688-1281reponame:Revista Cirugía del Uruguayinstname:Sociedad de Cirugía del Uruguayinstacron:Sociedad de Cirugía del Uruguayspahttps://revista.scu.org.uy/index.php/cir_urug/article/view/4372/4111info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess2021-04-20T03:24:55Zoai:ojs2.revista.scu.org.uy:article/4372Privadahttps://scu.org.uy/https://revista.scu.org.uy/index.php/cir_urug/oaiUruguayopendoar:2021-04-20T03:24:55Revista Cirugía del Uruguay - Sociedad de Cirugía del Uruguayfalse |
spellingShingle | Shouldice technique and mesh interposition by Prolene. Preliminary results Pagán Pomar, Alberto hernia inguinal cirugía inguinal hernia surgery |
status_str | publishedVersion |
title | Shouldice technique and mesh interposition by Prolene. Preliminary results |
title_full | Shouldice technique and mesh interposition by Prolene. Preliminary results |
title_fullStr | Shouldice technique and mesh interposition by Prolene. Preliminary results |
title_full_unstemmed | Shouldice technique and mesh interposition by Prolene. Preliminary results |
title_short | Shouldice technique and mesh interposition by Prolene. Preliminary results |
title_sort | Shouldice technique and mesh interposition by Prolene. Preliminary results |
topic | hernia inguinal cirugía inguinal hernia surgery |
url | https://revista.scu.org.uy/index.php/cir_urug/article/view/4372 |