Mammary gland cancer
Cáncer de mama
Resumen:
Panel discussions clearly indicate that the anamnesisand examination are valuable elements for the diagnosisof mammary gland canear, evaluating its diagnosticefficiency in a 94%.The diagnostic is confirmad by the severa! complementaryexaminations requested as per a defined algorhythm,according to the clínica! stage obtained asper T.N.M. classification
Del panel discusión surge claramente el valor de laanamnesis y examen en el diagnóstico del cáncer demama evaluando su eficacia diagnóstica en un 94%.El diagnóstico se reafirma por los diversos exámenescomplementarios solicitados según un algorritmodefinido de acuerdo al estadio clínico obtenido segúnla clasificación T.N.M.
| 1984 | |
|
mama cáncer breast cancer |
|
| Español | |
| Sociedad de Cirugía del Uruguay | |
| Revista Cirugía del Uruguay | |
| https://revista.scu.org.uy/index.php/cir_urug/article/view/3554 | |
| Acceso abierto |
| Sumario: | Panel discussions clearly indicate that the anamnesisand examination are valuable elements for the diagnosisof mammary gland canear, evaluating its diagnosticefficiency in a 94%.The diagnostic is confirmad by the severa! complementaryexaminations requested as per a defined algorhythm,according to the clínica! stage obtained asper T.N.M. classification |
|---|
