Unobserved Residual Intrahepatic Lithiasis Compliated with Septic Cholangitis

Colangitis aguda séptica por litiasis residual intrahepática inadvertida

Praderi, Raúl - Crestanello, Francisco - Rodríguez de Vecchi, Victoriano - Estefan, Alberto

Resumen:

The paper reports on two cases, operated successively, of unobserved residuar intrahepatic lithiasis, no- ·withstanding intraoperatory cholangiography performed in both cases. In one of these cases only an intrahepaticbiliary branch was seen, free of calculi; in the other, filling of superior biliary tract was not achieved.For these reasons transcystic drainages were placed in both patients. During postoperatory both developedgrave septic cholangitis with renal insufficiency and were reoperated as urgencies in order to drain the common tract duct with tubes. When their condition improved, wide hepatico - choledoco - jejunostomies were performed. Intrahepatic lithiasis is rare iri Uruguay and coincidence of this compÍication in two successive patients renders it even more unusual.


Se presentan las observaciones de 2 paciente


Detalles Bibliográficos
1980
colelitiasis
vías biliares
cholelithiasis
bile duct
Español
Sociedad de Cirugía del Uruguay
Revista Cirugía del Uruguay
https://revista.scu.org.uy/index.php/cir_urug/article/view/3044
Acceso abierto
_version_ 1815772766919458816
author Praderi, Raúl
author2 Crestanello, Francisco
Rodríguez de Vecchi, Victoriano
Estefan, Alberto
author2_role author
author
author
author_facet Praderi, Raúl
Crestanello, Francisco
Rodríguez de Vecchi, Victoriano
Estefan, Alberto
author_role author
collection Revista Cirugía del Uruguay
dc.creator.none.fl_str_mv Praderi, Raúl
Crestanello, Francisco
Rodríguez de Vecchi, Victoriano
Estefan, Alberto
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 1980-03-15
dc.description.abstract.none.fl_txt_mv The paper reports on two cases, operated successively, of unobserved residuar intrahepatic lithiasis, no- ·withstanding intraoperatory cholangiography performed in both cases. In one of these cases only an intrahepaticbiliary branch was seen, free of calculi; in the other, filling of superior biliary tract was not achieved.For these reasons transcystic drainages were placed in both patients. During postoperatory both developedgrave septic cholangitis with renal insufficiency and were reoperated as urgencies in order to drain the common tract duct with tubes. When their condition improved, wide hepatico - choledoco - jejunostomies were performed. Intrahepatic lithiasis is rare iri Uruguay and coincidence of this compÍication in two successive patients renders it even more unusual.
Se presentan las observaciones de 2 paciente
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
dc.identifier.none.fl_str_mv https://revista.scu.org.uy/index.php/cir_urug/article/view/3044
dc.language.iso.none.fl_str_mv spa
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Sociedad de Cirugía del Uruguay
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv https://revista.scu.org.uy/index.php/cir_urug/article/view/3044/2895
dc.rights.none.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Revista Cirugía del Uruguay; Vol. 50 No. 3 (1980): Cirugía del Uruguay; 202-211
Revista Cirugía del Uruguay; Vol. 50 Núm. 3 (1980): Cirugía del Uruguay; 202-211
1688-1281
reponame:Revista Cirugía del Uruguay
instname:Sociedad de Cirugía del Uruguay
instacron:Sociedad de Cirugía del Uruguay
dc.subject.none.fl_str_mv colelitiasis
vías biliares
cholelithiasis
bile duct
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Unobserved Residual Intrahepatic Lithiasis Compliated with Septic Cholangitis
Colangitis aguda séptica por litiasis residual intrahepática inadvertida
dc.type.none.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
dc.type.version.none.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
description The paper reports on two cases, operated successively, of unobserved residuar intrahepatic lithiasis, no- ·withstanding intraoperatory cholangiography performed in both cases. In one of these cases only an intrahepaticbiliary branch was seen, free of calculi; in the other, filling of superior biliary tract was not achieved.For these reasons transcystic drainages were placed in both patients. During postoperatory both developedgrave septic cholangitis with renal insufficiency and were reoperated as urgencies in order to drain the common tract duct with tubes. When their condition improved, wide hepatico - choledoco - jejunostomies were performed. Intrahepatic lithiasis is rare iri Uruguay and coincidence of this compÍication in two successive patients renders it even more unusual.
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
format article
id SCU_1_3fe8334fba64bc241f7e8e73ce9a82e4
instacron_str Sociedad de Cirugía del Uruguay
institution Sociedad de Cirugía del Uruguay
instname_str Sociedad de Cirugía del Uruguay
language spa
network_acronym_str SCU_1
network_name_str Revista Cirugía del Uruguay
oai_identifier_str oai:ojs2.revista.scu.org.uy:article/3044
publishDate 1980
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Sociedad de Cirugía del Uruguay
reponame_str Revista Cirugía del Uruguay
repository.mail.fl_str_mv
repository.name.fl_str_mv Revista Cirugía del Uruguay - Sociedad de Cirugía del Uruguay
repository_id_str
spelling Unobserved Residual Intrahepatic Lithiasis Compliated with Septic CholangitisColangitis aguda séptica por litiasis residual intrahepática inadvertidaPraderi, RaúlCrestanello, FranciscoRodríguez de Vecchi, VictorianoEstefan, Albertocolelitiasisvías biliarescholelithiasisbile ductThe paper reports on two cases, operated successively, of unobserved residuar intrahepatic lithiasis, no- ·withstanding intraoperatory cholangiography performed in both cases. In one of these cases only an intrahepaticbiliary branch was seen, free of calculi; in the other, filling of superior biliary tract was not achieved.For these reasons transcystic drainages were placed in both patients. During postoperatory both developedgrave septic cholangitis with renal insufficiency and were reoperated as urgencies in order to drain the common tract duct with tubes. When their condition improved, wide hepatico - choledoco - jejunostomies were performed. Intrahepatic lithiasis is rare iri Uruguay and coincidence of this compÍication in two successive patients renders it even more unusual. Se presentan las observaciones de 2 paciente Sociedad de Cirugía del Uruguay1980-03-15info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionapplication/pdfhttps://revista.scu.org.uy/index.php/cir_urug/article/view/3044Revista Cirugía del Uruguay; Vol. 50 No. 3 (1980): Cirugía del Uruguay; 202-211Revista Cirugía del Uruguay; Vol. 50 Núm. 3 (1980): Cirugía del Uruguay; 202-2111688-1281reponame:Revista Cirugía del Uruguayinstname:Sociedad de Cirugía del Uruguayinstacron:Sociedad de Cirugía del Uruguayspahttps://revista.scu.org.uy/index.php/cir_urug/article/view/3044/2895info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess2021-03-18T01:25:24Zoai:ojs2.revista.scu.org.uy:article/3044Privadahttps://scu.org.uy/https://revista.scu.org.uy/index.php/cir_urug/oaiUruguayopendoar:2021-03-18T01:25:24Revista Cirugía del Uruguay - Sociedad de Cirugía del Uruguayfalse
spellingShingle Unobserved Residual Intrahepatic Lithiasis Compliated with Septic Cholangitis
Praderi, Raúl
colelitiasis
vías biliares
cholelithiasis
bile duct
status_str publishedVersion
title Unobserved Residual Intrahepatic Lithiasis Compliated with Septic Cholangitis
title_full Unobserved Residual Intrahepatic Lithiasis Compliated with Septic Cholangitis
title_fullStr Unobserved Residual Intrahepatic Lithiasis Compliated with Septic Cholangitis
title_full_unstemmed Unobserved Residual Intrahepatic Lithiasis Compliated with Septic Cholangitis
title_short Unobserved Residual Intrahepatic Lithiasis Compliated with Septic Cholangitis
title_sort Unobserved Residual Intrahepatic Lithiasis Compliated with Septic Cholangitis
topic colelitiasis
vías biliares
cholelithiasis
bile duct
url https://revista.scu.org.uy/index.php/cir_urug/article/view/3044