Diagnóstico del reflujo fémoro-safeno: Comparación de 5 métodos de estudio con los hallazgos intraoperatorios

Rudnitzky, Omar - Sciuto, Fernando - Davezac, Víctor - Caputti, Sonia

Resumen:

The diagnosis of femoro-saphenous reflux is ofutmost importance for the corree/ treatment ofChronic Venous Failure patients. The authors evaluated the diagnostic accuracy of the climc,Doppler, Ouplex, ascending and descendingphlebography in 53 patients that were testedintraoperatively for FSR. They point out /he lowsensitivity of the c/inic (53%) and the high sensitivityand specificity of Duplex (100%) and Doppler (98and 100%) considerably greater than ascendingphlebography (78 and 75%), until now known as theclassical paraclinical method.


El diagnóstico del reflujo fémoro-safeno (RFS) esde jerarquía para el correcto tratamiento de lospacientes con insuficiencia venosa crónica (IVC) Sevaloró la precisión de la clínica, el Ooppler, elOuplex, la f/ebografía ascendente y descendentepara realizar este diagnóstico en 53 pacientes, enquienes se testó en forma intraoperatoria lapresencia de RFS Se destaca la baja sensibilidadde la clínica (53%), las altas sensibilidades yespecificidades del Ouplex (100%) y del Doppler(98% y 100%), considerablemente mayores que lasde la flebografía ascendente (78% y 75%),reconocidas hasta ahora como el métodoparaclínico clásico.


Detalles Bibliográficos
1991
insuficiencia venosa
vein insufficiency
Español
Sociedad de Cirugía del Uruguay
Revista Cirugía del Uruguay
https://revista.scu.org.uy/index.php/cir_urug/article/view/3971
Acceso abierto
Resumen:
Sumario:The diagnosis of femoro-saphenous reflux is ofutmost importance for the corree/ treatment ofChronic Venous Failure patients. The authors evaluated the diagnostic accuracy of the climc,Doppler, Ouplex, ascending and descendingphlebography in 53 patients that were testedintraoperatively for FSR. They point out /he lowsensitivity of the c/inic (53%) and the high sensitivityand specificity of Duplex (100%) and Doppler (98and 100%) considerably greater than ascendingphlebography (78 and 75%), until now known as theclassical paraclinical method.