Histological classification of Hodgkin's disease
Clasificación histológica de la enfermedad de Hodgkin
Resumen:
This is a report on the results obtained through a retrospective histological study of 45 cases of Hodgkin's disease. This study was made using the "double caecum"system, following the classification proposed by the Rye Conference. The histological group most frequently found in diagnosis, was that termed lymphociticprevalence. In this aspect the authors differ from the findings of North American authors, who report a greater incidence of the group which presents· scleroticnodes. Possiblec auses for this discrepancy are analyzed and the possibility df its being due to a geographic variation in the pathology of Hodgkin's d.isease, is not discarde.
Los autores comunican los resultados obtenidos mediante el estudio histológico retrospectivo de 45 casos de enfermedad de Hodgkin. Este estudio se llevó acabo mediante el sistema del "doble ciego" y se aplicó la clasificación propuesta en la Conferencia Rye. El grupo histológico más frecuentemente diagnosticado fueel denominado predominio linfocitario. Esto contrasta con los hallazgos de autores norteamericanos, que comunican una frecuencia mayor para el grupo esclerosisnodular. Los autores analizan las posibles causas de dicha discrepancia y no descartan la posibilidad de que sea imputable a una variación geográfica en la patologíade la enfermedad de Hodgkin.
1972 | |
enfermedad de Hodgkin tratamiento Hodking disease treatment |
|
Español | |
Sociedad de Cirugía del Uruguay | |
Revista Cirugía del Uruguay | |
https://revista.scu.org.uy/index.php/cir_urug/article/view/2275 | |
Acceso abierto |
Sumario: | This is a report on the results obtained through a retrospective histological study of 45 cases of Hodgkin's disease. This study was made using the "double caecum"system, following the classification proposed by the Rye Conference. The histological group most frequently found in diagnosis, was that termed lymphociticprevalence. In this aspect the authors differ from the findings of North American authors, who report a greater incidence of the group which presents· scleroticnodes. Possiblec auses for this discrepancy are analyzed and the possibility df its being due to a geographic variation in the pathology of Hodgkin's d.isease, is not discarde. |
---|