Does the better -than- average effect show that people are overconfident?: two experiments
Resumen:
We conduct two experiments of the claim that people are overconfident, using newtests of overplacement that are based on a formal Bayesian model. Our two experi-ments, on easy quizzes, find overplacement. More precisely, we find apparently over-confident data that cannot be accounted for by a rational population of expected utilitymaximizers with a good understanding of the nature of the quizzes they took. The finding is of particular interest because Benoit and Dubra (2011) have shown that thevast majority of the existing findings on the better-than-average e§ect are actuallyconsistent with Bayesian updating.
2013 | |
Overconfidence Better than Average Experimental Economics Irrationality Signalling Models |
|
Inglés | |
Universidad de Montevideo | |
REDUM | |
https://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12806/1330 | |
Acceso abierto | |
Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 Internacional |
Resultados similares
-
Apparent overconfidence
Autor(es):: Benoit, Jean Pierre
Fecha de publicación:: (2011) -
Gender differences to relative performance feedback: a field experiment in education
Autor(es):: Cabrera, José María
Fecha de publicación:: (2017) -
More than an infodemic: Pandemic, pos-truth and the dangers of irrationalism
Autor(es):: Waisbord, Silvio
Fecha de publicación:: (2022) -
Pear accession fingerprinting through microsatellite markers in Uruguay. [abstract of poster].
Autor(es):: IRIARTE, W.
Fecha de publicación:: (2018) -
Does deliberation improve civic competences in adolescents? A systematic review of deliberative experiments
Autor(es):: Ottobre Aichino, Ana Laura
Fecha de publicación:: (2024)