The cost-effective choice of policy instruments to cap aggregate emissions with costly enforcement
Resumen:
We study the cost-e§ectiveness of inducing compliance in a program that caps aggregate emissions of a given pollutant from a set of heterogeneous Örms based on emissions standards and the relative cost-e§ectiveness of such a program with respect to an optimally designed program based on tradable discharge permits. Our analysis considers abatement, monitoring and sanctioning costs, as well as perfect and imperfect information on the part of the regulator with regard to the pollutersí abatement costs. Under perfect information we Önd that (a) the total cost-e§ective design of a program based on standards is one in which the standards are Örm speciÖc and perfectly enforced, and (b) the total cost of an optimally designed program based on standards is lower than the total cost of an optimally designed transferable emission permits system, except under special conditions. This is true when it is optimum to induce perfect compliance and when it is not. Under imperfect information, nevertheless, it is only with a system of tradable permits that is perfectly enforced with a constant marginal penalty tied to the price of the permits that the regulator can surmount the informational problem and at the same time minimize the total cost of the program with certainty.
2011 | |
Environmental policy Cost-effectiveness Enforcement costs Monitoring costs |
|
Inglés | |
Universidad de Montevideo | |
REDUM | |
https://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12806/2446
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10640-011-9481-y |
|
Acceso abierto | |
Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 Internacional |
_version_ | 1807356681307291648 |
---|---|
author | Caffera, Marcelo |
author2 | Chávez, Carlos |
author2_role | author |
author_facet | Caffera, Marcelo Chávez, Carlos |
author_role | author |
bitstream.checksum.fl_str_mv | dc7dbda4b46e5ae0bf2b19f208917f09 4460e5956bc1d1639be9ae6146a50347 691ed290c8bf8671811a9242b7fc04b6 bd43df3a55d633352d8da02d2247945a b4ecba1d28baca9a138df4ba2448d1ca |
bitstream.checksumAlgorithm.fl_str_mv | MD5 MD5 MD5 MD5 MD5 |
bitstream.url.fl_str_mv | http://redum.um.edu.uy/bitstream/20.500.12806/2446/1/The_Cost-Effective_Choice_of_Policy_Instruments_to_Cap_Aggregate_Emissions_with_Costly_Enforcement_Caffera.pdf http://redum.um.edu.uy/bitstream/20.500.12806/2446/2/license_rdf http://redum.um.edu.uy/bitstream/20.500.12806/2446/3/license.txt http://redum.um.edu.uy/bitstream/20.500.12806/2446/4/The_Cost-Effective_Choice_of_Policy_Instruments_to_Cap_Aggregate_Emissions_with_Costly_Enforcement_Caffera.pdf.txt http://redum.um.edu.uy/bitstream/20.500.12806/2446/5/The_Cost-Effective_Choice_of_Policy_Instruments_to_Cap_Aggregate_Emissions_with_Costly_Enforcement_Caffera.pdf.jpg |
collection | REDUM |
dc.contributor.filiacion.es.fl_str_mv | Caffera, Marcelo. Universidad de Montevideo, Uruguay |
dc.creator.none.fl_str_mv | Caffera, Marcelo Chávez, Carlos |
dc.date.accessioned.none.fl_str_mv | 2024-06-12T20:48:42Z |
dc.date.available.none.fl_str_mv | 2024-06-12T20:48:42Z |
dc.date.issued.es.fl_str_mv | 2011 |
dc.description.abstract.none.fl_txt_mv | We study the cost-e§ectiveness of inducing compliance in a program that caps aggregate emissions of a given pollutant from a set of heterogeneous Örms based on emissions standards and the relative cost-e§ectiveness of such a program with respect to an optimally designed program based on tradable discharge permits. Our analysis considers abatement, monitoring and sanctioning costs, as well as perfect and imperfect information on the part of the regulator with regard to the pollutersí abatement costs. Under perfect information we Önd that (a) the total cost-e§ective design of a program based on standards is one in which the standards are Örm speciÖc and perfectly enforced, and (b) the total cost of an optimally designed program based on standards is lower than the total cost of an optimally designed transferable emission permits system, except under special conditions. This is true when it is optimum to induce perfect compliance and when it is not. Under imperfect information, nevertheless, it is only with a system of tradable permits that is perfectly enforced with a constant marginal penalty tied to the price of the permits that the regulator can surmount the informational problem and at the same time minimize the total cost of the program with certainty. |
dc.format.extent.es.fl_str_mv | pp. 531-557 |
dc.format.mimetype.es.fl_str_mv | application/pdf |
dc.identifier.doi.es.fl_str_mv | https://doi.org/10.1007/s10640-011-9481-y |
dc.identifier.issn.es.fl_str_mv | 1573-1502 |
dc.identifier.uri.none.fl_str_mv | https://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12806/2446 |
dc.language.iso.none.fl_str_mv | eng |
dc.publisher.es.fl_str_mv | Springer |
dc.relation.ispartof.es.fl_str_mv | Environmental and Resource Economics, vol. 50, n°4, 531-557 |
dc.rights.es.fl_str_mv | Abierto |
dc.rights.license.none.fl_str_mv | Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 Internacional |
dc.rights.none.fl_str_mv | info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
dc.rights.uri.*.fl_str_mv | http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv | reponame:REDUM instname:Universidad de Montevideo instacron:Universidad de Montevideo |
dc.subject.keyword.es.fl_str_mv | Environmental policy Cost-effectiveness Enforcement costs Monitoring costs |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv | The cost-effective choice of policy instruments to cap aggregate emissions with costly enforcement |
dc.type.es.fl_str_mv | Artículo |
dc.type.none.fl_str_mv | info:eu-repo/semantics/article |
dc.type.version.es.fl_str_mv | Aceptada |
dc.type.version.none.fl_str_mv | info:eu-repo/semantics/acceptedVersion |
description | We study the cost-e§ectiveness of inducing compliance in a program that caps aggregate emissions of a given pollutant from a set of heterogeneous Örms based on emissions standards and the relative cost-e§ectiveness of such a program with respect to an optimally designed program based on tradable discharge permits. Our analysis considers abatement, monitoring and sanctioning costs, as well as perfect and imperfect information on the part of the regulator with regard to the pollutersí abatement costs. Under perfect information we Önd that (a) the total cost-e§ective design of a program based on standards is one in which the standards are Örm speciÖc and perfectly enforced, and (b) the total cost of an optimally designed program based on standards is lower than the total cost of an optimally designed transferable emission permits system, except under special conditions. This is true when it is optimum to induce perfect compliance and when it is not. Under imperfect information, nevertheless, it is only with a system of tradable permits that is perfectly enforced with a constant marginal penalty tied to the price of the permits that the regulator can surmount the informational problem and at the same time minimize the total cost of the program with certainty. |
eu_rights_str_mv | openAccess |
format | article |
id | REDUM_8ef237ebef98f5a819f2c54b321b3c3b |
identifier_str_mv | 1573-1502 |
instacron_str | Universidad de Montevideo |
institution | Universidad de Montevideo |
instname_str | Universidad de Montevideo |
language | eng |
network_acronym_str | REDUM |
network_name_str | REDUM |
oai_identifier_str | oai:redum.um.edu.uy:20.500.12806/2446 |
publishDate | 2011 |
reponame_str | REDUM |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv | nolascoaga@um.edu.uy |
repository.name.fl_str_mv | REDUM - Universidad de Montevideo |
repository_id_str | 10501 |
rights_invalid_str_mv | Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 Internacional Abierto http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ |
spelling | Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 InternacionalAbiertohttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess29379aa7-bd77-483a-9074-54df31de362e9b42c627-a3c8-425f-a478-23a2f0ec6700Caffera, Marcelo. Universidad de Montevideo, Uruguay2024-06-12T20:48:42Z2024-06-12T20:48:42Z20111573-1502https://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12806/2446https://doi.org/10.1007/s10640-011-9481-ypp. 531-557application/pdfengSpringerEnvironmental and Resource Economics, vol. 50, n°4, 531-557The cost-effective choice of policy instruments to cap aggregate emissions with costly enforcementArtículoAceptadainfo:eu-repo/semantics/acceptedVersioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/articleWe study the cost-e§ectiveness of inducing compliance in a program that caps aggregate emissions of a given pollutant from a set of heterogeneous Örms based on emissions standards and the relative cost-e§ectiveness of such a program with respect to an optimally designed program based on tradable discharge permits. Our analysis considers abatement, monitoring and sanctioning costs, as well as perfect and imperfect information on the part of the regulator with regard to the pollutersí abatement costs. Under perfect information we Önd that (a) the total cost-e§ective design of a program based on standards is one in which the standards are Örm speciÖc and perfectly enforced, and (b) the total cost of an optimally designed program based on standards is lower than the total cost of an optimally designed transferable emission permits system, except under special conditions. This is true when it is optimum to induce perfect compliance and when it is not. Under imperfect information, nevertheless, it is only with a system of tradable permits that is perfectly enforced with a constant marginal penalty tied to the price of the permits that the regulator can surmount the informational problem and at the same time minimize the total cost of the program with certainty.Environmental policyCost-effectivenessEnforcement costsMonitoring costsreponame:REDUMinstname:Universidad de Montevideoinstacron:Universidad de MontevideoCaffera, MarceloChávez, CarlosORIGINALThe_Cost-Effective_Choice_of_Policy_Instruments_to_Cap_Aggregate_Emissions_with_Costly_Enforcement_Caffera.pdfThe_Cost-Effective_Choice_of_Policy_Instruments_to_Cap_Aggregate_Emissions_with_Costly_Enforcement_Caffera.pdfapplication/pdf219879http://redum.um.edu.uy/bitstream/20.500.12806/2446/1/The_Cost-Effective_Choice_of_Policy_Instruments_to_Cap_Aggregate_Emissions_with_Costly_Enforcement_Caffera.pdfdc7dbda4b46e5ae0bf2b19f208917f09MD51CC-LICENSElicense_rdflicense_rdfapplication/rdf+xml; charset=utf-8805http://redum.um.edu.uy/bitstream/20.500.12806/2446/2/license_rdf4460e5956bc1d1639be9ae6146a50347MD52LICENSElicense.txtlicense.txttext/plain; charset=utf-82117http://redum.um.edu.uy/bitstream/20.500.12806/2446/3/license.txt691ed290c8bf8671811a9242b7fc04b6MD53TEXTThe_Cost-Effective_Choice_of_Policy_Instruments_to_Cap_Aggregate_Emissions_with_Costly_Enforcement_Caffera.pdf.txtThe_Cost-Effective_Choice_of_Policy_Instruments_to_Cap_Aggregate_Emissions_with_Costly_Enforcement_Caffera.pdf.txtExtracted texttext/plain83944http://redum.um.edu.uy/bitstream/20.500.12806/2446/4/The_Cost-Effective_Choice_of_Policy_Instruments_to_Cap_Aggregate_Emissions_with_Costly_Enforcement_Caffera.pdf.txtbd43df3a55d633352d8da02d2247945aMD54THUMBNAILThe_Cost-Effective_Choice_of_Policy_Instruments_to_Cap_Aggregate_Emissions_with_Costly_Enforcement_Caffera.pdf.jpgThe_Cost-Effective_Choice_of_Policy_Instruments_to_Cap_Aggregate_Emissions_with_Costly_Enforcement_Caffera.pdf.jpgGenerated Thumbnailimage/jpeg1415http://redum.um.edu.uy/bitstream/20.500.12806/2446/5/The_Cost-Effective_Choice_of_Policy_Instruments_to_Cap_Aggregate_Emissions_with_Costly_Enforcement_Caffera.pdf.jpgb4ecba1d28baca9a138df4ba2448d1caMD5520.500.12806/24462024-06-13 03:00:23.456oai:redum.um.edu.uy:20.500.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Universidadhttps://um.edu.uy/https://redum.um.edu.uy/oai/requestnolascoaga@um.edu.uyUruguayopendoar:105012024-06-13T06:00:23REDUM - Universidad de Montevideofalse |
spellingShingle | The cost-effective choice of policy instruments to cap aggregate emissions with costly enforcement Caffera, Marcelo Environmental policy Cost-effectiveness Enforcement costs Monitoring costs |
status_str | acceptedVersion |
title | The cost-effective choice of policy instruments to cap aggregate emissions with costly enforcement |
title_full | The cost-effective choice of policy instruments to cap aggregate emissions with costly enforcement |
title_fullStr | The cost-effective choice of policy instruments to cap aggregate emissions with costly enforcement |
title_full_unstemmed | The cost-effective choice of policy instruments to cap aggregate emissions with costly enforcement |
title_short | The cost-effective choice of policy instruments to cap aggregate emissions with costly enforcement |
title_sort | The cost-effective choice of policy instruments to cap aggregate emissions with costly enforcement |
topic | Environmental policy Cost-effectiveness Enforcement costs Monitoring costs |
url | https://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12806/2446 https://doi.org/10.1007/s10640-011-9481-y |