The cost-effective choice of policy instruments to cap aggregate emissions with costly enforcement

Caffera, Marcelo - Chávez, Carlos

Resumen:

We study the cost-e§ectiveness of inducing compliance in a program that caps aggregate emissions of a given pollutant from a set of heterogeneous Örms based on emissions standards and the relative cost-e§ectiveness of such a program with respect to an optimally designed program based on tradable discharge permits. Our analysis considers abatement, monitoring and sanctioning costs, as well as perfect and imperfect information on the part of the regulator with regard to the pollutersí abatement costs. Under perfect information we Önd that (a) the total cost-e§ective design of a program based on standards is one in which the standards are Örm speciÖc and perfectly enforced, and (b) the total cost of an optimally designed program based on standards is lower than the total cost of an optimally designed transferable emission permits system, except under special conditions. This is true when it is optimum to induce perfect compliance and when it is not. Under imperfect information, nevertheless, it is only with a system of tradable permits that is perfectly enforced with a constant marginal penalty tied to the price of the permits that the regulator can surmount the informational problem and at the same time minimize the total cost of the program with certainty.


Detalles Bibliográficos
2011
Environmental policy
Cost-effectiveness
Enforcement costs
Monitoring costs
Inglés
Universidad de Montevideo
REDUM
https://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12806/2446
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10640-011-9481-y
Acceso abierto
Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 Internacional
_version_ 1807356681307291648
author Caffera, Marcelo
author2 Chávez, Carlos
author2_role author
author_facet Caffera, Marcelo
Chávez, Carlos
author_role author
bitstream.checksum.fl_str_mv dc7dbda4b46e5ae0bf2b19f208917f09
4460e5956bc1d1639be9ae6146a50347
691ed290c8bf8671811a9242b7fc04b6
bd43df3a55d633352d8da02d2247945a
b4ecba1d28baca9a138df4ba2448d1ca
bitstream.checksumAlgorithm.fl_str_mv MD5
MD5
MD5
MD5
MD5
bitstream.url.fl_str_mv http://redum.um.edu.uy/bitstream/20.500.12806/2446/1/The_Cost-Effective_Choice_of_Policy_Instruments_to_Cap_Aggregate_Emissions_with_Costly_Enforcement_Caffera.pdf
http://redum.um.edu.uy/bitstream/20.500.12806/2446/2/license_rdf
http://redum.um.edu.uy/bitstream/20.500.12806/2446/3/license.txt
http://redum.um.edu.uy/bitstream/20.500.12806/2446/4/The_Cost-Effective_Choice_of_Policy_Instruments_to_Cap_Aggregate_Emissions_with_Costly_Enforcement_Caffera.pdf.txt
http://redum.um.edu.uy/bitstream/20.500.12806/2446/5/The_Cost-Effective_Choice_of_Policy_Instruments_to_Cap_Aggregate_Emissions_with_Costly_Enforcement_Caffera.pdf.jpg
collection REDUM
dc.contributor.filiacion.es.fl_str_mv Caffera, Marcelo. Universidad de Montevideo, Uruguay
dc.creator.none.fl_str_mv Caffera, Marcelo
Chávez, Carlos
dc.date.accessioned.none.fl_str_mv 2024-06-12T20:48:42Z
dc.date.available.none.fl_str_mv 2024-06-12T20:48:42Z
dc.date.issued.es.fl_str_mv 2011
dc.description.abstract.none.fl_txt_mv We study the cost-e§ectiveness of inducing compliance in a program that caps aggregate emissions of a given pollutant from a set of heterogeneous Örms based on emissions standards and the relative cost-e§ectiveness of such a program with respect to an optimally designed program based on tradable discharge permits. Our analysis considers abatement, monitoring and sanctioning costs, as well as perfect and imperfect information on the part of the regulator with regard to the pollutersí abatement costs. Under perfect information we Önd that (a) the total cost-e§ective design of a program based on standards is one in which the standards are Örm speciÖc and perfectly enforced, and (b) the total cost of an optimally designed program based on standards is lower than the total cost of an optimally designed transferable emission permits system, except under special conditions. This is true when it is optimum to induce perfect compliance and when it is not. Under imperfect information, nevertheless, it is only with a system of tradable permits that is perfectly enforced with a constant marginal penalty tied to the price of the permits that the regulator can surmount the informational problem and at the same time minimize the total cost of the program with certainty.
dc.format.extent.es.fl_str_mv pp. 531-557
dc.format.mimetype.es.fl_str_mv application/pdf
dc.identifier.doi.es.fl_str_mv https://doi.org/10.1007/s10640-011-9481-y
dc.identifier.issn.es.fl_str_mv 1573-1502
dc.identifier.uri.none.fl_str_mv https://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12806/2446
dc.language.iso.none.fl_str_mv eng
dc.publisher.es.fl_str_mv Springer
dc.relation.ispartof.es.fl_str_mv Environmental and Resource Economics, vol. 50, n°4, 531-557
dc.rights.es.fl_str_mv Abierto
dc.rights.license.none.fl_str_mv Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 Internacional
dc.rights.none.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
dc.rights.uri.*.fl_str_mv http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv reponame:REDUM
instname:Universidad de Montevideo
instacron:Universidad de Montevideo
dc.subject.keyword.es.fl_str_mv Environmental policy
Cost-effectiveness
Enforcement costs
Monitoring costs
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv The cost-effective choice of policy instruments to cap aggregate emissions with costly enforcement
dc.type.es.fl_str_mv Artículo
dc.type.none.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
dc.type.version.es.fl_str_mv Aceptada
dc.type.version.none.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/acceptedVersion
description We study the cost-e§ectiveness of inducing compliance in a program that caps aggregate emissions of a given pollutant from a set of heterogeneous Örms based on emissions standards and the relative cost-e§ectiveness of such a program with respect to an optimally designed program based on tradable discharge permits. Our analysis considers abatement, monitoring and sanctioning costs, as well as perfect and imperfect information on the part of the regulator with regard to the pollutersí abatement costs. Under perfect information we Önd that (a) the total cost-e§ective design of a program based on standards is one in which the standards are Örm speciÖc and perfectly enforced, and (b) the total cost of an optimally designed program based on standards is lower than the total cost of an optimally designed transferable emission permits system, except under special conditions. This is true when it is optimum to induce perfect compliance and when it is not. Under imperfect information, nevertheless, it is only with a system of tradable permits that is perfectly enforced with a constant marginal penalty tied to the price of the permits that the regulator can surmount the informational problem and at the same time minimize the total cost of the program with certainty.
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
format article
id REDUM_8ef237ebef98f5a819f2c54b321b3c3b
identifier_str_mv 1573-1502
instacron_str Universidad de Montevideo
institution Universidad de Montevideo
instname_str Universidad de Montevideo
language eng
network_acronym_str REDUM
network_name_str REDUM
oai_identifier_str oai:redum.um.edu.uy:20.500.12806/2446
publishDate 2011
reponame_str REDUM
repository.mail.fl_str_mv nolascoaga@um.edu.uy
repository.name.fl_str_mv REDUM - Universidad de Montevideo
repository_id_str 10501
rights_invalid_str_mv Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 Internacional
Abierto
http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/
spelling Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 InternacionalAbiertohttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess29379aa7-bd77-483a-9074-54df31de362e9b42c627-a3c8-425f-a478-23a2f0ec6700Caffera, Marcelo. Universidad de Montevideo, Uruguay2024-06-12T20:48:42Z2024-06-12T20:48:42Z20111573-1502https://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12806/2446https://doi.org/10.1007/s10640-011-9481-ypp. 531-557application/pdfengSpringerEnvironmental and Resource Economics, vol. 50, n°4, 531-557The cost-effective choice of policy instruments to cap aggregate emissions with costly enforcementArtículoAceptadainfo:eu-repo/semantics/acceptedVersioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/articleWe study the cost-e§ectiveness of inducing compliance in a program that caps aggregate emissions of a given pollutant from a set of heterogeneous Örms based on emissions standards and the relative cost-e§ectiveness of such a program with respect to an optimally designed program based on tradable discharge permits. Our analysis considers abatement, monitoring and sanctioning costs, as well as perfect and imperfect information on the part of the regulator with regard to the pollutersí abatement costs. Under perfect information we Önd that (a) the total cost-e§ective design of a program based on standards is one in which the standards are Örm speciÖc and perfectly enforced, and (b) the total cost of an optimally designed program based on standards is lower than the total cost of an optimally designed transferable emission permits system, except under special conditions. This is true when it is optimum to induce perfect compliance and when it is not. Under imperfect information, nevertheless, it is only with a system of tradable permits that is perfectly enforced with a constant marginal penalty tied to the price of the permits that the regulator can surmount the informational problem and at the same time minimize the total cost of the program with certainty.Environmental policyCost-effectivenessEnforcement costsMonitoring costsreponame:REDUMinstname:Universidad de Montevideoinstacron:Universidad de MontevideoCaffera, MarceloChávez, CarlosORIGINALThe_Cost-Effective_Choice_of_Policy_Instruments_to_Cap_Aggregate_Emissions_with_Costly_Enforcement_Caffera.pdfThe_Cost-Effective_Choice_of_Policy_Instruments_to_Cap_Aggregate_Emissions_with_Costly_Enforcement_Caffera.pdfapplication/pdf219879http://redum.um.edu.uy/bitstream/20.500.12806/2446/1/The_Cost-Effective_Choice_of_Policy_Instruments_to_Cap_Aggregate_Emissions_with_Costly_Enforcement_Caffera.pdfdc7dbda4b46e5ae0bf2b19f208917f09MD51CC-LICENSElicense_rdflicense_rdfapplication/rdf+xml; charset=utf-8805http://redum.um.edu.uy/bitstream/20.500.12806/2446/2/license_rdf4460e5956bc1d1639be9ae6146a50347MD52LICENSElicense.txtlicense.txttext/plain; charset=utf-82117http://redum.um.edu.uy/bitstream/20.500.12806/2446/3/license.txt691ed290c8bf8671811a9242b7fc04b6MD53TEXTThe_Cost-Effective_Choice_of_Policy_Instruments_to_Cap_Aggregate_Emissions_with_Costly_Enforcement_Caffera.pdf.txtThe_Cost-Effective_Choice_of_Policy_Instruments_to_Cap_Aggregate_Emissions_with_Costly_Enforcement_Caffera.pdf.txtExtracted texttext/plain83944http://redum.um.edu.uy/bitstream/20.500.12806/2446/4/The_Cost-Effective_Choice_of_Policy_Instruments_to_Cap_Aggregate_Emissions_with_Costly_Enforcement_Caffera.pdf.txtbd43df3a55d633352d8da02d2247945aMD54THUMBNAILThe_Cost-Effective_Choice_of_Policy_Instruments_to_Cap_Aggregate_Emissions_with_Costly_Enforcement_Caffera.pdf.jpgThe_Cost-Effective_Choice_of_Policy_Instruments_to_Cap_Aggregate_Emissions_with_Costly_Enforcement_Caffera.pdf.jpgGenerated Thumbnailimage/jpeg1415http://redum.um.edu.uy/bitstream/20.500.12806/2446/5/The_Cost-Effective_Choice_of_Policy_Instruments_to_Cap_Aggregate_Emissions_with_Costly_Enforcement_Caffera.pdf.jpgb4ecba1d28baca9a138df4ba2448d1caMD5520.500.12806/24462024-06-13 03:00:23.456oai:redum.um.edu.uy:20.500.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Universidadhttps://um.edu.uy/https://redum.um.edu.uy/oai/requestnolascoaga@um.edu.uyUruguayopendoar:105012024-06-13T06:00:23REDUM - Universidad de Montevideofalse
spellingShingle The cost-effective choice of policy instruments to cap aggregate emissions with costly enforcement
Caffera, Marcelo
Environmental policy
Cost-effectiveness
Enforcement costs
Monitoring costs
status_str acceptedVersion
title The cost-effective choice of policy instruments to cap aggregate emissions with costly enforcement
title_full The cost-effective choice of policy instruments to cap aggregate emissions with costly enforcement
title_fullStr The cost-effective choice of policy instruments to cap aggregate emissions with costly enforcement
title_full_unstemmed The cost-effective choice of policy instruments to cap aggregate emissions with costly enforcement
title_short The cost-effective choice of policy instruments to cap aggregate emissions with costly enforcement
title_sort The cost-effective choice of policy instruments to cap aggregate emissions with costly enforcement
topic Environmental policy
Cost-effectiveness
Enforcement costs
Monitoring costs
url https://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12806/2446
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10640-011-9481-y