What can a creditor do in the incidental proceeding for classification of an insolvency proceeding? Is the classification of “fortuitous” by the receiver or court auditor binding upon the judge?
¿Qué puede hacer el acreedor en el incidente de calificación del proceso concursal? ¿Es vinculante para el juez la calificación fortuita de la sindicatura o intervención?
O que o credor pode fazer no incidente de qualificação do processo de insolvência? É vinculante para o juiz a qualificação fortuita da administração ou intervenção?
2022 | |
Incidente de calificacion Participación Acreedor Pro actione Control de convencionalidad Incidental proceeding for classification Participation Creditor Pro actione Conventionality control Incidente de qualificação Participação Credor Pro actione Controle de convencionalidade |
|
Español | |
Universidad de Montevideo | |
REDUM | |
http://revistas.um.edu.uy/index.php/revistaderecho/article/view/1086
https://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12806/1994 |
|
Acceso abierto | |
Atribución 4.0 Internacional |
_version_ | 1807356680013348864 |
---|---|
author | Pereira Campos, Santiago |
author2 | Vera Pacaluk, Micaela |
author2_role | author |
author_facet | Pereira Campos, Santiago Vera Pacaluk, Micaela |
author_role | author |
collection | REDUM |
dc.creator.none.fl_str_mv | Pereira Campos, Santiago Vera Pacaluk, Micaela |
dc.date.accessioned.none.fl_str_mv | 2024-02-03T14:20:31Z |
dc.date.available.none.fl_str_mv | 2024-02-03T14:20:31Z |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv | 2022-07-29 |
dc.description.en-US.fl_txt_mv | Regarding the reporting creditor in an incidental proceeding for classification, the position of national courts has been restrictive, limiting such creditor’s participation to simply reporting the relevant facts for classifying the insolvency as “guilty”. The purpose of this paper is to analyze the role of the creditor within the framework of the incidental process for classification of an insolvency proceeding in the light of the pro actione principles and the control of conventionality. It will also examine the impact of the repeal of article 198, final paragraph and article 199 of Law No. 18.387, by article 652 of Law No. 19.355 |
dc.description.es-ES.fl_txt_mv | En relación a la participación del acreedor denunciante en el incidente de calificación del concurso, la postura de nuestra jurisprudencia ha sido restrictiva limitando su participación a la mera denuncia de hechos relevantes para la calificación culpable. El presente trabajo tiene como objetivo analizar el rol del acreedor en el marco del incidente de calificación del proceso concursal a la luz de los principios pro actione y al control de convencionalidad. Asimismo, habrá de considerarse el impacto de la derogación introducida a los arts. 198 inciso final y 199 de la Ley 18.387, por el art. 652 de la Ley 19.355. |
dc.description.pt-BR.fl_txt_mv | Em relação à participação do credor denunciando o incidente de qualificação do processo de insolvência, a posição de nossa jurisprudência tem sido restritiva, limitando sua participação à mera denúncia de fatos relevantes para a qualificação do culpado. O objetivo deste documento é analisar o papel do credor no âmbito do incidente de qualificação do processo de insolvência, à luz dos princípios pro actione e do controle do convencionalismo. Além disso, haverá que considerar o impac |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv | application/pdf text/html |
dc.identifier.none.fl_str_mv | http://revistas.um.edu.uy/index.php/revistaderecho/article/view/1086 10.47274/DERUM/41.5 |
dc.identifier.uri.none.fl_str_mv | https://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12806/1994 |
dc.language.iso.none.fl_str_mv | spa |
dc.publisher.es-ES.fl_str_mv | Universidad de Montevideo. Facultad de Derecho |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv | http://revistas.um.edu.uy/index.php/revistaderecho/article/view/1086/1319 http://revistas.um.edu.uy/index.php/revistaderecho/article/view/1086/1322 |
dc.rights.es-ES.fl_str_mv | Derechos de autor 2022 Santiago Pereira Campos, Micaela Vera Pacaluk |
dc.rights.license.none.fl_str_mv | Atribución 4.0 Internacional |
dc.rights.none.fl_str_mv | info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
dc.source.en-US.fl_str_mv | Revista de Derecho; Vol. 21 No. 41 (2022); 85-113 |
dc.source.es-ES.fl_str_mv | Revista de Derecho; Vol. 21 Núm. 41 (2022); 85-113 |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv | 2301-1610 1510-5172 10.47274/DERUM/41 reponame:REDUM instname:Universidad de Montevideo instacron:Universidad de Montevideo |
dc.source.pt-BR.fl_str_mv | Revista de Derecho; v. 21 n. 41 (2022); 85-113 |
dc.subject.en-US.fl_str_mv | Incidental proceeding for classification Participation Creditor Pro actione Conventionality control |
dc.subject.es-ES.fl_str_mv | Incidente de calificacion Participación Acreedor Pro actione Control de convencionalidad |
dc.subject.pt-BR.fl_str_mv | Incidente de qualificação Participação Credor Pro actione Controle de convencionalidade |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv | What can a creditor do in the incidental proceeding for classification of an insolvency proceeding? Is the classification of “fortuitous” by the receiver or court auditor binding upon the judge? ¿Qué puede hacer el acreedor en el incidente de calificación del proceso concursal? ¿Es vinculante para el juez la calificación fortuita de la sindicatura o intervención? O que o credor pode fazer no incidente de qualificação do processo de insolvência? É vinculante para o juiz a qualificação fortuita da administração ou intervenção? |
dc.type.en-US.fl_str_mv | Peer reviewed article. |
dc.type.es-ES.fl_str_mv | Artículo evaluado por pares. |
dc.type.none.fl_str_mv | info:eu-repo/semantics/article info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion |
dc.type.pt-BR.fl_str_mv | Artigo revisto pelos pares. |
dc.type.version.none.fl_str_mv | publishedVersion info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion |
description | Regarding the reporting creditor in an incidental proceeding for classification, the position of national courts has been restrictive, limiting such creditor’s participation to simply reporting the relevant facts for classifying the insolvency as “guilty”. The purpose of this paper is to analyze the role of the creditor within the framework of the incidental process for classification of an insolvency proceeding in the light of the pro actione principles and the control of conventionality. It will also examine the impact of the repeal of article 198, final paragraph and article 199 of Law No. 18.387, by article 652 of Law No. 19.355 |
eu_rights_str_mv | openAccess |
format | article |
id | REDUM_70c21ce2d21203d32386ec14ade79bad |
identifier_str_mv | 10.47274/DERUM/41.5 |
instacron_str | Universidad de Montevideo |
institution | Universidad de Montevideo |
instname_str | Universidad de Montevideo |
language | spa |
network_acronym_str | REDUM |
network_name_str | REDUM |
oai_identifier_str | oai:redum.um.edu.uy:20.500.12806/1994 |
publishDate | 2022 |
reponame_str | REDUM |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv | nolascoaga@um.edu.uy |
repository.name.fl_str_mv | REDUM - Universidad de Montevideo |
repository_id_str | 10501 |
rights_invalid_str_mv | Derechos de autor 2022 Santiago Pereira Campos, Micaela Vera Pacaluk Atribución 4.0 Internacional |
spelling | Pereira Campos, SantiagoVera Pacaluk, Micaela2022-07-292024-02-03T14:20:31Z2024-02-03T14:20:31Zhttp://revistas.um.edu.uy/index.php/revistaderecho/article/view/108610.47274/DERUM/41.5https://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12806/1994Regarding the reporting creditor in an incidental proceeding for classification, the position of national courts has been restrictive, limiting such creditor’s participation to simply reporting the relevant facts for classifying the insolvency as “guilty”. The purpose of this paper is to analyze the role of the creditor within the framework of the incidental process for classification of an insolvency proceeding in the light of the pro actione principles and the control of conventionality. It will also examine the impact of the repeal of article 198, final paragraph and article 199 of Law No. 18.387, by article 652 of Law No. 19.355En relación a la participación del acreedor denunciante en el incidente de calificación del concurso, la postura de nuestra jurisprudencia ha sido restrictiva limitando su participación a la mera denuncia de hechos relevantes para la calificación culpable. El presente trabajo tiene como objetivo analizar el rol del acreedor en el marco del incidente de calificación del proceso concursal a la luz de los principios pro actione y al control de convencionalidad. Asimismo, habrá de considerarse el impacto de la derogación introducida a los arts. 198 inciso final y 199 de la Ley 18.387, por el art. 652 de la Ley 19.355.Em relação à participação do credor denunciando o incidente de qualificação do processo de insolvência, a posição de nossa jurisprudência tem sido restritiva, limitando sua participação à mera denúncia de fatos relevantes para a qualificação do culpado. O objetivo deste documento é analisar o papel do credor no âmbito do incidente de qualificação do processo de insolvência, à luz dos princípios pro actione e do controle do convencionalismo. Além disso, haverá que considerar o impacapplication/pdftext/htmlspaUniversidad de Montevideo. Facultad de Derechohttp://revistas.um.edu.uy/index.php/revistaderecho/article/view/1086/1319http://revistas.um.edu.uy/index.php/revistaderecho/article/view/1086/1322Derechos de autor 2022 Santiago Pereira Campos, Micaela Vera Pacalukinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessAtribución 4.0 InternacionalRevista de Derecho; Vol. 21 No. 41 (2022); 85-113Revista de Derecho; Vol. 21 Núm. 41 (2022); 85-113Revista de Derecho; v. 21 n. 41 (2022); 85-1132301-16101510-517210.47274/DERUM/41reponame:REDUMinstname:Universidad de Montevideoinstacron:Universidad de MontevideoIncidente de calificacionParticipaciónAcreedorPro actioneControl de convencionalidadIncidental proceeding for classificationParticipationCreditorPro actioneConventionality controlIncidente de qualificaçãoParticipaçãoCredorPro actioneControle de convencionalidadeWhat can a creditor do in the incidental proceeding for classification of an insolvency proceeding? Is the classification of “fortuitous” by the receiver or court auditor binding upon the judge?¿Qué puede hacer el acreedor en el incidente de calificación del proceso concursal? ¿Es vinculante para el juez la calificación fortuita de la sindicatura o intervención?O que o credor pode fazer no incidente de qualificação do processo de insolvência? É vinculante para o juiz a qualificação fortuita da administração ou intervenção?info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionPeer reviewed article.Artículo evaluado por pares.Artigo revisto pelos pares.publishedVersioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion20.500.12806/19942024-02-03 11:20:31.337oai:redum.um.edu.uy:20.500.12806/1994Universidadhttps://um.edu.uy/https://redum.um.edu.uy/oai/requestnolascoaga@um.edu.uyUruguayopendoar:105012024-02-03T14:20:31REDUM - Universidad de Montevideofalse |
spellingShingle | What can a creditor do in the incidental proceeding for classification of an insolvency proceeding? Is the classification of “fortuitous” by the receiver or court auditor binding upon the judge? Pereira Campos, Santiago Incidente de calificacion Participación Acreedor Pro actione Control de convencionalidad Incidental proceeding for classification Participation Creditor Pro actione Conventionality control Incidente de qualificação Participação Credor Pro actione Controle de convencionalidade |
status_str | publishedVersion |
title | What can a creditor do in the incidental proceeding for classification of an insolvency proceeding? Is the classification of “fortuitous” by the receiver or court auditor binding upon the judge? |
title_full | What can a creditor do in the incidental proceeding for classification of an insolvency proceeding? Is the classification of “fortuitous” by the receiver or court auditor binding upon the judge? |
title_fullStr | What can a creditor do in the incidental proceeding for classification of an insolvency proceeding? Is the classification of “fortuitous” by the receiver or court auditor binding upon the judge? |
title_full_unstemmed | What can a creditor do in the incidental proceeding for classification of an insolvency proceeding? Is the classification of “fortuitous” by the receiver or court auditor binding upon the judge? |
title_short | What can a creditor do in the incidental proceeding for classification of an insolvency proceeding? Is the classification of “fortuitous” by the receiver or court auditor binding upon the judge? |
title_sort | What can a creditor do in the incidental proceeding for classification of an insolvency proceeding? Is the classification of “fortuitous” by the receiver or court auditor binding upon the judge? |
topic | Incidente de calificacion Participación Acreedor Pro actione Control de convencionalidad Incidental proceeding for classification Participation Creditor Pro actione Conventionality control Incidente de qualificação Participação Credor Pro actione Controle de convencionalidade |
url | http://revistas.um.edu.uy/index.php/revistaderecho/article/view/1086 https://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12806/1994 |