Direct international jurisdiction in Private International Law with special reference to article 57 of law No. 19.920
La jurisdicción internacional directa en el Derecho Internacional Privado con especial referencia al Art. 57 de la ley 19.920
A jurisdição internacional direta no Direito Internacional Privado com especial referência ao Art. 57 da Lei 19.920
2022 | |
Ley 19.920 Jurisdicción internacional Límites Law No. 19.920 International jurisdiction Limits Lei 19.920 Jurisdição internacional Limites |
|
Español | |
Universidad de Montevideo | |
REDUM | |
http://revistas.um.edu.uy/index.php/revistaderecho/article/view/1085
https://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12806/1993 |
|
Acceso abierto | |
Atribución 4.0 Internacional |
_version_ | 1807356685338017792 |
---|---|
author | Ferreira, Alejandro |
author_facet | Ferreira, Alejandro |
author_role | author |
collection | REDUM |
dc.creator.none.fl_str_mv | Ferreira, Alejandro |
dc.date.accessioned.none.fl_str_mv | 2024-02-03T14:20:31Z |
dc.date.available.none.fl_str_mv | 2024-02-03T14:20:31Z |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv | 2022-07-29 |
dc.description.en-US.fl_txt_mv | The regulation of international private situations involves the determination of three empirical aspects. The substantive law applicable to the case, the courts that will have jurisdiction and the rules of legal continuity of judgments and arbitral awards, as well as the various mechanisms of international civil for criminal procedural cooperation. In this paper we will analyze the new bases of international jurisdiction determined in Law No. 19.920, as they represented a substantive transformation of the international legal landscape. The repeal of the Appendix to the Civil Code, especially article 2401 (which contained two criteria of bilateral jurisdiction), brought with it almost twenty criteria of direct jurisdiction, where party autonomy and forum of necessity stand out, among many other parameters without direct antecedents in the pre-existing Private International Law system of conventional and autonomous source. In this paper we address the new bases of jurisdiction and the limits provided in the light of General International Law. |
dc.description.es-ES.fl_txt_mv | La regulación de las situaciones privadas internacionales trae aparejado la determinación de tres presupuestos empíricos. El derecho sustantivo aplicable al caso, los tribunales que asumirán competencia y las reglas de continuidad jurídica de los fallos y laudos arbitrales, así como los diversos mecanismos de cooperación procesal civil o penal internacional. En este artículo analizaremos las nuevas bases de competencia internacional determinadas en la ley 19.920, en tanto que representaron una transformación sustantiva del panorama iusprivatista internacional. La derogación del Apéndice del Código Civil, en especial el art.2401 (que contenía dos criterios de jurisdicción bilateral), trajo consigo casi una veintena de criterios de base de jurisdicción directa, entre los que destacan la autonomía de la voluntad, el foro de necesidad, entre muchos otros parámetros sin antecedentes directos en el sistema de Derecho Internacional Privado de fuente convencional y autónomo preexistente. En este artículo abordamos las nuevas bases de competencia y los límites que se disponen a la luz del Derecho Internacional General. |
dc.description.pt-BR.fl_txt_mv | A regulação de situações privadas internacionais implica a determinação de três pressupostos empíricos. O direito substantivo aplicável ao caso, os tribunais que têm competência e as regras de continuidade jurídica das decisões e sentenças arbitrais, bem como os diversos mecanismos de cooperação processual civil ou penal internacional. Neste artigo analisaremos as novas bases de competência internacional determinadas na lei 19.920, enquanto que representaram uma transformação substantiva do panorama iusprivatista internacional. A revogação do Apêndice do Código Civil, em especial o art.2401 (que continha dois critérios de jurisdição bilateral), trouxe consigo quase vinte critérios de base de jurisdição direta, entre os quais se destacam a autonomia da vontade, o foro de necessidade, entre muitos outros parâmetros sem antecedentes diretos no sistema de Direito Internacional Privado de fonte convencional e autônomo preexistente. Neste artigo abordamos as novas bases de concorrência e os limites que se dispõem à luz do Direito Internacional Geral. |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv | application/pdf text/html |
dc.identifier.none.fl_str_mv | http://revistas.um.edu.uy/index.php/revistaderecho/article/view/1085 10.47274/DERUM/41.4 |
dc.identifier.uri.none.fl_str_mv | https://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12806/1993 |
dc.language.iso.none.fl_str_mv | spa |
dc.publisher.es-ES.fl_str_mv | Universidad de Montevideo. Facultad de Derecho |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv | http://revistas.um.edu.uy/index.php/revistaderecho/article/view/1085/1317 http://revistas.um.edu.uy/index.php/revistaderecho/article/view/1085/1318 |
dc.rights.es-ES.fl_str_mv | Derechos de autor 2022 Alejandro Ferreira |
dc.rights.license.none.fl_str_mv | Atribución 4.0 Internacional |
dc.rights.none.fl_str_mv | info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
dc.source.en-US.fl_str_mv | Revista de Derecho; Vol. 21 No. 41 (2022); 53-83 |
dc.source.es-ES.fl_str_mv | Revista de Derecho; Vol. 21 Núm. 41 (2022); 53-83 |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv | 2301-1610 1510-5172 10.47274/DERUM/41 reponame:REDUM instname:Universidad de Montevideo instacron:Universidad de Montevideo |
dc.source.pt-BR.fl_str_mv | Revista de Derecho; v. 21 n. 41 (2022); 53-83 |
dc.subject.en-US.fl_str_mv | Law No. 19.920 International jurisdiction Limits |
dc.subject.es-ES.fl_str_mv | Ley 19.920 Jurisdicción internacional Límites |
dc.subject.pt-BR.fl_str_mv | Lei 19.920 Jurisdição internacional Limites |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv | Direct international jurisdiction in Private International Law with special reference to article 57 of law No. 19.920 La jurisdicción internacional directa en el Derecho Internacional Privado con especial referencia al Art. 57 de la ley 19.920 A jurisdição internacional direta no Direito Internacional Privado com especial referência ao Art. 57 da Lei 19.920 |
dc.type.en-US.fl_str_mv | Peer reviewed article. |
dc.type.es-ES.fl_str_mv | Artículo evaluado por pares. |
dc.type.none.fl_str_mv | info:eu-repo/semantics/article info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion |
dc.type.pt-BR.fl_str_mv | Artigo revisto pelos pares. |
dc.type.version.none.fl_str_mv | publishedVersion info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion |
description | The regulation of international private situations involves the determination of three empirical aspects. The substantive law applicable to the case, the courts that will have jurisdiction and the rules of legal continuity of judgments and arbitral awards, as well as the various mechanisms of international civil for criminal procedural cooperation. In this paper we will analyze the new bases of international jurisdiction determined in Law No. 19.920, as they represented a substantive transformation of the international legal landscape. The repeal of the Appendix to the Civil Code, especially article 2401 (which contained two criteria of bilateral jurisdiction), brought with it almost twenty criteria of direct jurisdiction, where party autonomy and forum of necessity stand out, among many other parameters without direct antecedents in the pre-existing Private International Law system of conventional and autonomous source. In this paper we address the new bases of jurisdiction and the limits provided in the light of General International Law. |
eu_rights_str_mv | openAccess |
format | article |
id | REDUM_3f78dfab8cb8ae98f4476a5e65ccaa44 |
identifier_str_mv | 10.47274/DERUM/41.4 |
instacron_str | Universidad de Montevideo |
institution | Universidad de Montevideo |
instname_str | Universidad de Montevideo |
language | spa |
network_acronym_str | REDUM |
network_name_str | REDUM |
oai_identifier_str | oai:redum.um.edu.uy:20.500.12806/1993 |
publishDate | 2022 |
reponame_str | REDUM |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv | nolascoaga@um.edu.uy |
repository.name.fl_str_mv | REDUM - Universidad de Montevideo |
repository_id_str | 10501 |
rights_invalid_str_mv | Derechos de autor 2022 Alejandro Ferreira Atribución 4.0 Internacional |
spelling | Ferreira, Alejandro2022-07-292024-02-03T14:20:31Z2024-02-03T14:20:31Zhttp://revistas.um.edu.uy/index.php/revistaderecho/article/view/108510.47274/DERUM/41.4https://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12806/1993The regulation of international private situations involves the determination of three empirical aspects. The substantive law applicable to the case, the courts that will have jurisdiction and the rules of legal continuity of judgments and arbitral awards, as well as the various mechanisms of international civil for criminal procedural cooperation. In this paper we will analyze the new bases of international jurisdiction determined in Law No. 19.920, as they represented a substantive transformation of the international legal landscape. The repeal of the Appendix to the Civil Code, especially article 2401 (which contained two criteria of bilateral jurisdiction), brought with it almost twenty criteria of direct jurisdiction, where party autonomy and forum of necessity stand out, among many other parameters without direct antecedents in the pre-existing Private International Law system of conventional and autonomous source. In this paper we address the new bases of jurisdiction and the limits provided in the light of General International Law.La regulación de las situaciones privadas internacionales trae aparejado la determinación de tres presupuestos empíricos. El derecho sustantivo aplicable al caso, los tribunales que asumirán competencia y las reglas de continuidad jurídica de los fallos y laudos arbitrales, así como los diversos mecanismos de cooperación procesal civil o penal internacional. En este artículo analizaremos las nuevas bases de competencia internacional determinadas en la ley 19.920, en tanto que representaron una transformación sustantiva del panorama iusprivatista internacional. La derogación del Apéndice del Código Civil, en especial el art.2401 (que contenía dos criterios de jurisdicción bilateral), trajo consigo casi una veintena de criterios de base de jurisdicción directa, entre los que destacan la autonomía de la voluntad, el foro de necesidad, entre muchos otros parámetros sin antecedentes directos en el sistema de Derecho Internacional Privado de fuente convencional y autónomo preexistente. En este artículo abordamos las nuevas bases de competencia y los límites que se disponen a la luz del Derecho Internacional General.A regulação de situações privadas internacionais implica a determinação de três pressupostos empíricos. O direito substantivo aplicável ao caso, os tribunais que têm competência e as regras de continuidade jurídica das decisões e sentenças arbitrais, bem como os diversos mecanismos de cooperação processual civil ou penal internacional. Neste artigo analisaremos as novas bases de competência internacional determinadas na lei 19.920, enquanto que representaram uma transformação substantiva do panorama iusprivatista internacional. A revogação do Apêndice do Código Civil, em especial o art.2401 (que continha dois critérios de jurisdição bilateral), trouxe consigo quase vinte critérios de base de jurisdição direta, entre os quais se destacam a autonomia da vontade, o foro de necessidade, entre muitos outros parâmetros sem antecedentes diretos no sistema de Direito Internacional Privado de fonte convencional e autônomo preexistente. Neste artigo abordamos as novas bases de concorrência e os limites que se dispõem à luz do Direito Internacional Geral.application/pdftext/htmlspaUniversidad de Montevideo. Facultad de Derechohttp://revistas.um.edu.uy/index.php/revistaderecho/article/view/1085/1317http://revistas.um.edu.uy/index.php/revistaderecho/article/view/1085/1318Derechos de autor 2022 Alejandro Ferreirainfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessAtribución 4.0 InternacionalRevista de Derecho; Vol. 21 No. 41 (2022); 53-83Revista de Derecho; Vol. 21 Núm. 41 (2022); 53-83Revista de Derecho; v. 21 n. 41 (2022); 53-832301-16101510-517210.47274/DERUM/41reponame:REDUMinstname:Universidad de Montevideoinstacron:Universidad de MontevideoLey 19.920Jurisdicción internacionalLímitesLaw No. 19.920International jurisdictionLimitsLei 19.920Jurisdição internacionalLimitesDirect international jurisdiction in Private International Law with special reference to article 57 of law No. 19.920La jurisdicción internacional directa en el Derecho Internacional Privado con especial referencia al Art. 57 de la ley 19.920A jurisdição internacional direta no Direito Internacional Privado com especial referência ao Art. 57 da Lei 19.920info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionPeer reviewed article.Artículo evaluado por pares.Artigo revisto pelos pares.publishedVersioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion20.500.12806/19932024-02-03 11:20:31.123oai:redum.um.edu.uy:20.500.12806/1993Universidadhttps://um.edu.uy/https://redum.um.edu.uy/oai/requestnolascoaga@um.edu.uyUruguayopendoar:105012024-02-03T14:20:31REDUM - Universidad de Montevideofalse |
spellingShingle | Direct international jurisdiction in Private International Law with special reference to article 57 of law No. 19.920 Ferreira, Alejandro Ley 19.920 Jurisdicción internacional Límites Law No. 19.920 International jurisdiction Limits Lei 19.920 Jurisdição internacional Limites |
status_str | publishedVersion |
title | Direct international jurisdiction in Private International Law with special reference to article 57 of law No. 19.920 |
title_full | Direct international jurisdiction in Private International Law with special reference to article 57 of law No. 19.920 |
title_fullStr | Direct international jurisdiction in Private International Law with special reference to article 57 of law No. 19.920 |
title_full_unstemmed | Direct international jurisdiction in Private International Law with special reference to article 57 of law No. 19.920 |
title_short | Direct international jurisdiction in Private International Law with special reference to article 57 of law No. 19.920 |
title_sort | Direct international jurisdiction in Private International Law with special reference to article 57 of law No. 19.920 |
topic | Ley 19.920 Jurisdicción internacional Límites Law No. 19.920 International jurisdiction Limits Lei 19.920 Jurisdição internacional Limites |
url | http://revistas.um.edu.uy/index.php/revistaderecho/article/view/1085 https://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12806/1993 |