Direct international jurisdiction in Private International Law with special reference to article 57 of law No. 19.920

La jurisdicción internacional directa en el Derecho Internacional Privado con especial referencia al Art. 57 de la ley 19.920

A jurisdição internacional direta no Direito Internacional Privado com especial referência ao Art. 57 da Lei 19.920

Ferreira, Alejandro
Detalles Bibliográficos
2022
Ley 19.920
Jurisdicción internacional
Límites
Law No. 19.920
International jurisdiction
Limits
Lei 19.920
Jurisdição internacional
Limites
Español
Universidad de Montevideo
REDUM
http://revistas.um.edu.uy/index.php/revistaderecho/article/view/1085
https://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12806/1993
Acceso abierto
Atribución 4.0 Internacional
_version_ 1807356685338017792
author Ferreira, Alejandro
author_facet Ferreira, Alejandro
author_role author
collection REDUM
dc.creator.none.fl_str_mv Ferreira, Alejandro
dc.date.accessioned.none.fl_str_mv 2024-02-03T14:20:31Z
dc.date.available.none.fl_str_mv 2024-02-03T14:20:31Z
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2022-07-29
dc.description.en-US.fl_txt_mv The regulation of international private situations involves the determination of three empirical aspects. The substantive law applicable to the case, the courts that will have jurisdiction and the rules of legal continuity of judgments and arbitral awards, as well as the various mechanisms of international civil for criminal procedural cooperation. In this paper we will analyze the new bases of international jurisdiction determined in Law No. 19.920, as they represented a substantive transformation of the international legal landscape. The repeal of the Appendix to the Civil Code, especially article 2401 (which contained two criteria of bilateral jurisdiction), brought with it almost twenty criteria of direct jurisdiction, where party autonomy and forum of necessity stand out, among many other parameters without direct antecedents in the pre-existing Private International Law system of conventional and autonomous source. In this paper we address the new bases of jurisdiction and the limits provided in the light of General International Law.
dc.description.es-ES.fl_txt_mv La regulación de las situaciones privadas internacionales trae aparejado la determinación de tres presupuestos empíricos. El derecho sustantivo aplicable al caso, los tribunales que asumirán competencia y las reglas de continuidad jurídica de los fallos y laudos arbitrales, así como los diversos mecanismos de cooperación procesal civil o penal internacional. En este artículo analizaremos las nuevas bases de competencia internacional determinadas en la ley 19.920, en tanto que representaron una transformación sustantiva del panorama iusprivatista internacional. La derogación del Apéndice del Código Civil, en especial el art.2401 (que contenía dos criterios de jurisdicción bilateral), trajo consigo casi una veintena de criterios de base de jurisdicción directa, entre los que destacan la autonomía de la voluntad, el foro de necesidad, entre muchos otros parámetros sin antecedentes directos en el sistema de Derecho Internacional Privado de fuente convencional y autónomo preexistente. En este artículo abordamos las nuevas bases de competencia y los límites que se disponen a la luz del Derecho Internacional General.
dc.description.pt-BR.fl_txt_mv A regulação de situações privadas internacionais implica a determinação de três pressupostos empíricos. O direito substantivo aplicável ao caso, os tribunais que têm competência e as regras de continuidade jurídica das decisões e sentenças arbitrais, bem como os diversos mecanismos de cooperação processual civil ou penal internacional. Neste artigo analisaremos as novas bases de competência internacional determinadas na lei 19.920, enquanto que representaram uma transformação substantiva do panorama iusprivatista internacional. A revogação do Apêndice do Código Civil, em especial o art.2401 (que continha dois critérios de jurisdição bilateral), trouxe consigo quase vinte critérios de base de jurisdição direta, entre os quais se destacam a autonomia da vontade, o foro de necessidade, entre muitos outros parâmetros sem antecedentes diretos no sistema de Direito Internacional Privado de fonte convencional e autônomo preexistente. Neste artigo abordamos as novas bases de concorrência e os limites que se dispõem à luz do Direito Internacional Geral.
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
text/html
dc.identifier.none.fl_str_mv http://revistas.um.edu.uy/index.php/revistaderecho/article/view/1085
10.47274/DERUM/41.4
dc.identifier.uri.none.fl_str_mv https://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12806/1993
dc.language.iso.none.fl_str_mv spa
dc.publisher.es-ES.fl_str_mv Universidad de Montevideo. Facultad de Derecho
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv http://revistas.um.edu.uy/index.php/revistaderecho/article/view/1085/1317
http://revistas.um.edu.uy/index.php/revistaderecho/article/view/1085/1318
dc.rights.es-ES.fl_str_mv Derechos de autor 2022 Alejandro Ferreira
dc.rights.license.none.fl_str_mv Atribución 4.0 Internacional
dc.rights.none.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
dc.source.en-US.fl_str_mv Revista de Derecho; Vol. 21 No. 41 (2022); 53-83
dc.source.es-ES.fl_str_mv Revista de Derecho; Vol. 21 Núm. 41 (2022); 53-83
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv 2301-1610
1510-5172
10.47274/DERUM/41
reponame:REDUM
instname:Universidad de Montevideo
instacron:Universidad de Montevideo
dc.source.pt-BR.fl_str_mv Revista de Derecho; v. 21 n. 41 (2022); 53-83
dc.subject.en-US.fl_str_mv Law No. 19.920
International jurisdiction
Limits
dc.subject.es-ES.fl_str_mv Ley 19.920
Jurisdicción internacional
Límites
dc.subject.pt-BR.fl_str_mv Lei 19.920
Jurisdição internacional
Limites
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Direct international jurisdiction in Private International Law with special reference to article 57 of law No. 19.920
La jurisdicción internacional directa en el Derecho Internacional Privado con especial referencia al Art. 57 de la ley 19.920
A jurisdição internacional direta no Direito Internacional Privado com especial referência ao Art. 57 da Lei 19.920
dc.type.en-US.fl_str_mv Peer reviewed article.
dc.type.es-ES.fl_str_mv Artículo evaluado por pares.
dc.type.none.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
dc.type.pt-BR.fl_str_mv Artigo revisto pelos pares.
dc.type.version.none.fl_str_mv publishedVersion
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
description The regulation of international private situations involves the determination of three empirical aspects. The substantive law applicable to the case, the courts that will have jurisdiction and the rules of legal continuity of judgments and arbitral awards, as well as the various mechanisms of international civil for criminal procedural cooperation. In this paper we will analyze the new bases of international jurisdiction determined in Law No. 19.920, as they represented a substantive transformation of the international legal landscape. The repeal of the Appendix to the Civil Code, especially article 2401 (which contained two criteria of bilateral jurisdiction), brought with it almost twenty criteria of direct jurisdiction, where party autonomy and forum of necessity stand out, among many other parameters without direct antecedents in the pre-existing Private International Law system of conventional and autonomous source. In this paper we address the new bases of jurisdiction and the limits provided in the light of General International Law.
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
format article
id REDUM_3f78dfab8cb8ae98f4476a5e65ccaa44
identifier_str_mv 10.47274/DERUM/41.4
instacron_str Universidad de Montevideo
institution Universidad de Montevideo
instname_str Universidad de Montevideo
language spa
network_acronym_str REDUM
network_name_str REDUM
oai_identifier_str oai:redum.um.edu.uy:20.500.12806/1993
publishDate 2022
reponame_str REDUM
repository.mail.fl_str_mv nolascoaga@um.edu.uy
repository.name.fl_str_mv REDUM - Universidad de Montevideo
repository_id_str 10501
rights_invalid_str_mv Derechos de autor 2022 Alejandro Ferreira
Atribución 4.0 Internacional
spelling Ferreira, Alejandro2022-07-292024-02-03T14:20:31Z2024-02-03T14:20:31Zhttp://revistas.um.edu.uy/index.php/revistaderecho/article/view/108510.47274/DERUM/41.4https://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12806/1993The regulation of international private situations involves the determination of three empirical aspects. The substantive law applicable to the case, the courts that will have jurisdiction and the rules of legal continuity of judgments and arbitral awards, as well as the various mechanisms of international civil for criminal procedural cooperation. In this paper we will analyze the new bases of international jurisdiction determined in Law No. 19.920, as they represented a substantive transformation of the international legal landscape. The repeal of the Appendix to the Civil Code, especially article 2401 (which contained two criteria of bilateral jurisdiction), brought with it almost twenty criteria of direct jurisdiction, where party autonomy and forum of necessity stand out, among many other parameters without direct antecedents in the pre-existing Private International Law system of conventional and autonomous source. In this paper we address the new bases of jurisdiction and the limits provided in the light of General International Law.La regulación de las situaciones privadas internacionales trae aparejado la determinación de tres presupuestos empíricos. El derecho sustantivo aplicable al caso, los tribunales que asumirán competencia y las reglas de continuidad jurídica de los fallos y laudos arbitrales, así como los diversos mecanismos de cooperación procesal civil o penal internacional. En este artículo analizaremos las nuevas bases de competencia internacional determinadas en la ley 19.920, en tanto que representaron una transformación sustantiva del panorama iusprivatista internacional. La derogación del Apéndice del Código Civil, en especial el art.2401 (que contenía dos criterios de jurisdicción bilateral), trajo consigo casi una veintena de criterios de base de jurisdicción directa, entre los que destacan la autonomía de la voluntad, el foro de necesidad, entre muchos otros parámetros sin antecedentes directos en el sistema de Derecho Internacional Privado de fuente convencional y autónomo preexistente. En este artículo abordamos las nuevas bases de competencia y los límites que se disponen a la luz del Derecho Internacional General.A regulação de situações privadas internacionais implica a determinação de três pressupostos empíricos. O direito substantivo aplicável ao caso, os tribunais que têm competência e as regras de continuidade jurídica das decisões e sentenças arbitrais, bem como os diversos mecanismos de cooperação processual civil ou penal internacional. Neste artigo analisaremos as novas bases de competência internacional determinadas na lei 19.920, enquanto que representaram uma transformação substantiva do panorama iusprivatista internacional. A revogação do Apêndice do Código Civil, em especial o art.2401 (que continha dois critérios de jurisdição bilateral), trouxe consigo quase vinte critérios de base de jurisdição direta, entre os quais se destacam a autonomia da vontade, o foro de necessidade, entre muitos outros parâmetros sem antecedentes diretos no sistema de Direito Internacional Privado de fonte convencional e autônomo preexistente. Neste artigo abordamos as novas bases de concorrência e os limites que se dispõem à luz do Direito Internacional Geral.application/pdftext/htmlspaUniversidad de Montevideo. Facultad de Derechohttp://revistas.um.edu.uy/index.php/revistaderecho/article/view/1085/1317http://revistas.um.edu.uy/index.php/revistaderecho/article/view/1085/1318Derechos de autor 2022 Alejandro Ferreirainfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessAtribución 4.0 InternacionalRevista de Derecho; Vol. 21 No. 41 (2022); 53-83Revista de Derecho; Vol. 21 Núm. 41 (2022); 53-83Revista de Derecho; v. 21 n. 41 (2022); 53-832301-16101510-517210.47274/DERUM/41reponame:REDUMinstname:Universidad de Montevideoinstacron:Universidad de MontevideoLey 19.920Jurisdicción internacionalLímitesLaw No. 19.920International jurisdictionLimitsLei 19.920Jurisdição internacionalLimitesDirect international jurisdiction in Private International Law with special reference to article 57 of law No. 19.920La jurisdicción internacional directa en el Derecho Internacional Privado con especial referencia al Art. 57 de la ley 19.920A jurisdição internacional direta no Direito Internacional Privado com especial referência ao Art. 57 da Lei 19.920info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionPeer reviewed article.Artículo evaluado por pares.Artigo revisto pelos pares.publishedVersioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion20.500.12806/19932024-02-03 11:20:31.123oai:redum.um.edu.uy:20.500.12806/1993Universidadhttps://um.edu.uy/https://redum.um.edu.uy/oai/requestnolascoaga@um.edu.uyUruguayopendoar:105012024-02-03T14:20:31REDUM - Universidad de Montevideofalse
spellingShingle Direct international jurisdiction in Private International Law with special reference to article 57 of law No. 19.920
Ferreira, Alejandro
Ley 19.920
Jurisdicción internacional
Límites
Law No. 19.920
International jurisdiction
Limits
Lei 19.920
Jurisdição internacional
Limites
status_str publishedVersion
title Direct international jurisdiction in Private International Law with special reference to article 57 of law No. 19.920
title_full Direct international jurisdiction in Private International Law with special reference to article 57 of law No. 19.920
title_fullStr Direct international jurisdiction in Private International Law with special reference to article 57 of law No. 19.920
title_full_unstemmed Direct international jurisdiction in Private International Law with special reference to article 57 of law No. 19.920
title_short Direct international jurisdiction in Private International Law with special reference to article 57 of law No. 19.920
title_sort Direct international jurisdiction in Private International Law with special reference to article 57 of law No. 19.920
topic Ley 19.920
Jurisdicción internacional
Límites
Law No. 19.920
International jurisdiction
Limits
Lei 19.920
Jurisdição internacional
Limites
url http://revistas.um.edu.uy/index.php/revistaderecho/article/view/1085
https://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12806/1993