The regulatory choice of noncompliance in the lab: effect on quantities, prices, and implications for the design of a cost-effective policy

Caffera, Marcelo - Chávez, Carlos

Resumen:

Recent theoretical developments show the conditions under which it is cost-effective for the regulator to induce perfect compliance in cap-and-trade programs. These conditions are based on the ability that a regulator with perfect information has to induce the firms to emit any desired level with different combinations of the number of permits supplied to the market and the monitoring probability, assuming that firms are expected profit maximizers. In this paper, we test this hypothesis with a series of laboratory experiments. Our results suggest that firms may behave significantly different from what these models predict precisely when the different combinations of the supply of permits and the monitoring probability induce compliance versus noncompliance. More specifically, by allowing noncompliance in a manner consistent with theory, the regulator could produce a decrease in emissions and an increase in the market price of tradable permits that is not predicted by the theoretical models. The implications for the cost-effective design of environmental policy are discussed.


Detalles Bibliográficos
2016
Emission standards
Emissions trading
Enforcement
Environmental policy
Laboratory experiments
Inglés
Universidad de Montevideo
REDUM
https://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12806/2445
https://doi.org/10.1515/bejeap-2014-0202
Acceso abierto
Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 Internacional
_version_ 1807356681265348608
author Caffera, Marcelo
author2 Chávez, Carlos
author2_role author
author_facet Caffera, Marcelo
Chávez, Carlos
author_role author
bitstream.checksum.fl_str_mv d8c3c5bcf4acd94c50c3183228402a7e
4460e5956bc1d1639be9ae6146a50347
691ed290c8bf8671811a9242b7fc04b6
0e04dc8750b00d19d82866fb90bcb0d9
a567515555bb4e4fd6835d1f09c23a08
bitstream.checksumAlgorithm.fl_str_mv MD5
MD5
MD5
MD5
MD5
bitstream.url.fl_str_mv http://redum.um.edu.uy/bitstream/20.500.12806/2445/1/10.1515_bejeap-2014-0202.pdf
http://redum.um.edu.uy/bitstream/20.500.12806/2445/2/license_rdf
http://redum.um.edu.uy/bitstream/20.500.12806/2445/3/license.txt
http://redum.um.edu.uy/bitstream/20.500.12806/2445/4/10.1515_bejeap-2014-0202.pdf.txt
http://redum.um.edu.uy/bitstream/20.500.12806/2445/5/10.1515_bejeap-2014-0202.pdf.jpg
collection REDUM
dc.contributor.filiacion.es.fl_str_mv Caffera, Marcelo. Universidad de Montevideo, Uruguay
Chávez, Carlos. Universidad de Talca, Chile
dc.creator.none.fl_str_mv Caffera, Marcelo
Chávez, Carlos
dc.date.accessioned.none.fl_str_mv 2024-06-12T20:03:05Z
dc.date.available.none.fl_str_mv 2024-06-12T20:03:05Z
dc.date.issued.es.fl_str_mv 2016
dc.description.abstract.none.fl_txt_mv Recent theoretical developments show the conditions under which it is cost-effective for the regulator to induce perfect compliance in cap-and-trade programs. These conditions are based on the ability that a regulator with perfect information has to induce the firms to emit any desired level with different combinations of the number of permits supplied to the market and the monitoring probability, assuming that firms are expected profit maximizers. In this paper, we test this hypothesis with a series of laboratory experiments. Our results suggest that firms may behave significantly different from what these models predict precisely when the different combinations of the supply of permits and the monitoring probability induce compliance versus noncompliance. More specifically, by allowing noncompliance in a manner consistent with theory, the regulator could produce a decrease in emissions and an increase in the market price of tradable permits that is not predicted by the theoretical models. The implications for the cost-effective design of environmental policy are discussed.
dc.format.extent.es.fl_str_mv pp. 727-753
dc.format.mimetype.es.fl_str_mv application/pdf
dc.identifier.doi.es.fl_str_mv https://doi.org/10.1515/bejeap-2014-0202
dc.identifier.issn.es.fl_str_mv 1935-1682
dc.identifier.uri.none.fl_str_mv https://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12806/2445
dc.language.iso.none.fl_str_mv eng
dc.publisher.es.fl_str_mv De Gruyter
dc.relation.ispartof.es.fl_str_mv The B.E. Journal of Economic Analysis & Policy, vol. 16, n°2, 727-753
dc.rights.es.fl_str_mv Abierto
dc.rights.license.none.fl_str_mv Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 Internacional
dc.rights.none.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
dc.rights.uri.*.fl_str_mv http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv reponame:REDUM
instname:Universidad de Montevideo
instacron:Universidad de Montevideo
dc.subject.keyword.es.fl_str_mv Emission standards
Emissions trading
Enforcement
Environmental policy
Laboratory experiments
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv The regulatory choice of noncompliance in the lab: effect on quantities, prices, and implications for the design of a cost-effective policy
dc.type.es.fl_str_mv Artículo
dc.type.none.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
dc.type.version.es.fl_str_mv Publicada
dc.type.version.none.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
description Recent theoretical developments show the conditions under which it is cost-effective for the regulator to induce perfect compliance in cap-and-trade programs. These conditions are based on the ability that a regulator with perfect information has to induce the firms to emit any desired level with different combinations of the number of permits supplied to the market and the monitoring probability, assuming that firms are expected profit maximizers. In this paper, we test this hypothesis with a series of laboratory experiments. Our results suggest that firms may behave significantly different from what these models predict precisely when the different combinations of the supply of permits and the monitoring probability induce compliance versus noncompliance. More specifically, by allowing noncompliance in a manner consistent with theory, the regulator could produce a decrease in emissions and an increase in the market price of tradable permits that is not predicted by the theoretical models. The implications for the cost-effective design of environmental policy are discussed.
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
format article
id REDUM_3c8cb5a6c86f19657af5581773a02179
identifier_str_mv 1935-1682
instacron_str Universidad de Montevideo
institution Universidad de Montevideo
instname_str Universidad de Montevideo
language eng
network_acronym_str REDUM
network_name_str REDUM
oai_identifier_str oai:redum.um.edu.uy:20.500.12806/2445
publishDate 2016
reponame_str REDUM
repository.mail.fl_str_mv nolascoaga@um.edu.uy
repository.name.fl_str_mv REDUM - Universidad de Montevideo
repository_id_str 10501
rights_invalid_str_mv Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 Internacional
Abierto
http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/
spelling Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 InternacionalAbiertohttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess29379aa7-bd77-483a-9074-54df31de362e9b42c627-a3c8-425f-a478-23a2f0ec6700Caffera, Marcelo. Universidad de Montevideo, UruguayChávez, Carlos. Universidad de Talca, Chile2024-06-12T20:03:05Z2024-06-12T20:03:05Z20161935-1682https://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12806/2445https://doi.org/10.1515/bejeap-2014-0202pp. 727-753application/pdfengDe GruyterThe B.E. Journal of Economic Analysis & Policy, vol. 16, n°2, 727-753The regulatory choice of noncompliance in the lab: effect on quantities, prices, and implications for the design of a cost-effective policyArtículoPublicadainfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/articleRecent theoretical developments show the conditions under which it is cost-effective for the regulator to induce perfect compliance in cap-and-trade programs. These conditions are based on the ability that a regulator with perfect information has to induce the firms to emit any desired level with different combinations of the number of permits supplied to the market and the monitoring probability, assuming that firms are expected profit maximizers. In this paper, we test this hypothesis with a series of laboratory experiments. Our results suggest that firms may behave significantly different from what these models predict precisely when the different combinations of the supply of permits and the monitoring probability induce compliance versus noncompliance. More specifically, by allowing noncompliance in a manner consistent with theory, the regulator could produce a decrease in emissions and an increase in the market price of tradable permits that is not predicted by the theoretical models. The implications for the cost-effective design of environmental policy are discussed.Emission standardsEmissions tradingEnforcementEnvironmental policyLaboratory experimentsreponame:REDUMinstname:Universidad de Montevideoinstacron:Universidad de MontevideoCaffera, MarceloChávez, CarlosORIGINAL10.1515_bejeap-2014-0202.pdf10.1515_bejeap-2014-0202.pdfapplication/pdf2049023http://redum.um.edu.uy/bitstream/20.500.12806/2445/1/10.1515_bejeap-2014-0202.pdfd8c3c5bcf4acd94c50c3183228402a7eMD51CC-LICENSElicense_rdflicense_rdfapplication/rdf+xml; charset=utf-8805http://redum.um.edu.uy/bitstream/20.500.12806/2445/2/license_rdf4460e5956bc1d1639be9ae6146a50347MD52LICENSElicense.txtlicense.txttext/plain; charset=utf-82117http://redum.um.edu.uy/bitstream/20.500.12806/2445/3/license.txt691ed290c8bf8671811a9242b7fc04b6MD53TEXT10.1515_bejeap-2014-0202.pdf.txt10.1515_bejeap-2014-0202.pdf.txtExtracted texttext/plain66691http://redum.um.edu.uy/bitstream/20.500.12806/2445/4/10.1515_bejeap-2014-0202.pdf.txt0e04dc8750b00d19d82866fb90bcb0d9MD54THUMBNAIL10.1515_bejeap-2014-0202.pdf.jpg10.1515_bejeap-2014-0202.pdf.jpgGenerated Thumbnailimage/jpeg1640http://redum.um.edu.uy/bitstream/20.500.12806/2445/5/10.1515_bejeap-2014-0202.pdf.jpga567515555bb4e4fd6835d1f09c23a08MD5520.500.12806/24452024-06-13 03:00:22.851oai:redum.um.edu.uy:20.500.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Universidadhttps://um.edu.uy/https://redum.um.edu.uy/oai/requestnolascoaga@um.edu.uyUruguayopendoar:105012024-06-13T06:00:22REDUM - Universidad de Montevideofalse
spellingShingle The regulatory choice of noncompliance in the lab: effect on quantities, prices, and implications for the design of a cost-effective policy
Caffera, Marcelo
Emission standards
Emissions trading
Enforcement
Environmental policy
Laboratory experiments
status_str publishedVersion
title The regulatory choice of noncompliance in the lab: effect on quantities, prices, and implications for the design of a cost-effective policy
title_full The regulatory choice of noncompliance in the lab: effect on quantities, prices, and implications for the design of a cost-effective policy
title_fullStr The regulatory choice of noncompliance in the lab: effect on quantities, prices, and implications for the design of a cost-effective policy
title_full_unstemmed The regulatory choice of noncompliance in the lab: effect on quantities, prices, and implications for the design of a cost-effective policy
title_short The regulatory choice of noncompliance in the lab: effect on quantities, prices, and implications for the design of a cost-effective policy
title_sort The regulatory choice of noncompliance in the lab: effect on quantities, prices, and implications for the design of a cost-effective policy
topic Emission standards
Emissions trading
Enforcement
Environmental policy
Laboratory experiments
url https://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12806/2445
https://doi.org/10.1515/bejeap-2014-0202