Evaluation of a MBR for treating slaughterhouse wastewater in Montevideo, Uruguay

Cunha, Nicolas

Supervisor(es): García, Hector - Hooijmans, Tineke - Míguez, Diana

Resumen:

In Uruguay, the problem of eutrophication of the rivers is every time more concerning. One of the biggest contributors are slaughterhouses, where they usually have ponds treatment system and do not comply with the discharge Standards, especially regarding to nutrients. This research aims to evaluate the performance of a pilot scale membrane bioreactor (MBR) for slaughterhouse wastewater treatment, in order to minimize the impact of their effluent discharge in rivers. It was carried out at one of the main slaughterhouses in Uruguay namely Schneck. The MBR consists on an anoxic compartment followed by one aerobic that contains a recirculation pump in order to recycle to the anoxic. The MBR was placed in order to take its influent from the first step of the treatment plant that was a homogenization basin. After some drawbacks, the MBR was inoculated with a domestic wastewater treatment plant and started operating. Some periods of trials were necessary until it reached a steady state, where it was operated with a recirculation ratio of 4 and an average dissolved oxygen of 3 mg/L, with aeration always on. The MLSS during this period was maintained between 10 and 12 g/L, with a waste flow of around 50 L/d. With these conditions, a total nitrification was achieved, with an average NH4 of 0.74 mgNH4-N/L, while the National discharge Standard limits this value at 5 mgNH4-N/L. Regarding to this parameter, the actual treatment plant was obtaining effluent values between 8 and 79 mgNH4-N/L. The COD and BOD removals in the MBR where higher than 95% with effluent values of BOD below the Standard limit. The only parameter above the Standard was the TP, which average was 14.7mg/L and the limit is 5mg/L (a chemical phosphorous removal should be carried out adding e.g. Ferric Chloride to the MBR). The Nitrate average in the effluent was 24 mg/L and the TN removal was 57.6%, meaning that the denitrification was not completed. Because of that, another trial conditions were investigated, with the same control parameters as the last one except the dissolved oxygen. The aeration was intermittent, turned “on” for 5 minutes and “off” for 15 minutes. The denitrification was enhanced and the total nitrogen removal efficiency reached a value of 78%. However, the NH4 increased to 6.2 mgNH4-N/L. Furthermore, a BioWin model for estimating the optimal location for the MBR at the existing ponds system treatment plant was carried out, considering the N-removal potential in relation to the COD/N influent ratio. The results shows that the best place to situate the MBR inlet is before the homogenization tank, where the COD/TN ratio is 14.0 and the removal TN efficiency is 83.7 %. The second best point for the MBR is after the homogenization tank (COD/TN=11.1), with an efficiency of 72.8 % . For the other points of the treatment plant (after each treatment pond), the COD/N ratio decreases below 6, and the TN removal was reduced at values below 53 %.


Detalles Bibliográficos
2016
Agencia Nacional de Investigación e Innovación
Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation
Membrane bioreactor
Reactor Biológico de Membranas
MBR
Slaughterhouse wastewater treatment
Nutrient removal
BioWin
Ingeniería y Tecnología
Ingeniería del Medio Ambiente
Inglés
Agencia Nacional de Investigación e Innovación
REDI
http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12381/175
Acceso abierto
Reconocimiento 4.0 Internacional. (CC BY)
_version_ 1814959259915386880
author Cunha, Nicolas
author_facet Cunha, Nicolas
author_role author
bitstream.checksum.fl_str_mv 2d97768b1a25a7df5a347bb58fd2d77f
b29f81b512cd00836014b688ecab9180
bitstream.checksumAlgorithm.fl_str_mv MD5
MD5
bitstream.url.fl_str_mv https://redi.anii.org.uy/jspui/bitstream/20.500.12381/175/2/license.txt
https://redi.anii.org.uy/jspui/bitstream/20.500.12381/175/1/POS_IHE_2014_1_6.pdf
collection REDI
dc.creator.advisor.none.fl_str_mv García, Hector
Hooijmans, Tineke
Míguez, Diana
dc.creator.none.fl_str_mv Cunha, Nicolas
dc.date.accessioned.none.fl_str_mv 2019-10-27T11:02:04Z
dc.date.available.none.fl_str_mv 2019-10-27T11:02:04Z
dc.date.issued.none.fl_str_mv 2016
dc.description.abstract.none.fl_txt_mv In Uruguay, the problem of eutrophication of the rivers is every time more concerning. One of the biggest contributors are slaughterhouses, where they usually have ponds treatment system and do not comply with the discharge Standards, especially regarding to nutrients. This research aims to evaluate the performance of a pilot scale membrane bioreactor (MBR) for slaughterhouse wastewater treatment, in order to minimize the impact of their effluent discharge in rivers. It was carried out at one of the main slaughterhouses in Uruguay namely Schneck. The MBR consists on an anoxic compartment followed by one aerobic that contains a recirculation pump in order to recycle to the anoxic. The MBR was placed in order to take its influent from the first step of the treatment plant that was a homogenization basin. After some drawbacks, the MBR was inoculated with a domestic wastewater treatment plant and started operating. Some periods of trials were necessary until it reached a steady state, where it was operated with a recirculation ratio of 4 and an average dissolved oxygen of 3 mg/L, with aeration always on. The MLSS during this period was maintained between 10 and 12 g/L, with a waste flow of around 50 L/d. With these conditions, a total nitrification was achieved, with an average NH4 of 0.74 mgNH4-N/L, while the National discharge Standard limits this value at 5 mgNH4-N/L. Regarding to this parameter, the actual treatment plant was obtaining effluent values between 8 and 79 mgNH4-N/L. The COD and BOD removals in the MBR where higher than 95% with effluent values of BOD below the Standard limit. The only parameter above the Standard was the TP, which average was 14.7mg/L and the limit is 5mg/L (a chemical phosphorous removal should be carried out adding e.g. Ferric Chloride to the MBR). The Nitrate average in the effluent was 24 mg/L and the TN removal was 57.6%, meaning that the denitrification was not completed. Because of that, another trial conditions were investigated, with the same control parameters as the last one except the dissolved oxygen. The aeration was intermittent, turned “on” for 5 minutes and “off” for 15 minutes. The denitrification was enhanced and the total nitrogen removal efficiency reached a value of 78%. However, the NH4 increased to 6.2 mgNH4-N/L. Furthermore, a BioWin model for estimating the optimal location for the MBR at the existing ponds system treatment plant was carried out, considering the N-removal potential in relation to the COD/N influent ratio. The results shows that the best place to situate the MBR inlet is before the homogenization tank, where the COD/TN ratio is 14.0 and the removal TN efficiency is 83.7 %. The second best point for the MBR is after the homogenization tank (COD/TN=11.1), with an efficiency of 72.8 % . For the other points of the treatment plant (after each treatment pond), the COD/N ratio decreases below 6, and the TN removal was reduced at values below 53 %.
dc.description.sponsorship.none.fl_txt_mv Agencia Nacional de Investigación e Innovación
Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation
dc.format.extent.es.fl_str_mv 74 p.
dc.identifier.anii.es.fl_str_mv POS_IHE_2014_1_6
dc.identifier.citation.es.fl_str_mv Cunha, Nicolas (2016). Evaluation of a MBR for treating slaughterhouse wastewater in Montevideo, Uruguay (tesis de maestría). UNESCO-IHE Institute for Water Education
dc.identifier.uri.none.fl_str_mv http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12381/175
dc.language.iso.none.fl_str_mv eng
dc.publisher.es.fl_str_mv UNESCO-IHE Institute for Water Education
dc.rights.es.fl_str_mv Acceso abierto
dc.rights.license.none.fl_str_mv Reconocimiento 4.0 Internacional. (CC BY)
dc.rights.none.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv reponame:REDI
instname:Agencia Nacional de Investigación e Innovación
instacron:Agencia Nacional de Investigación e Innovación
dc.subject.anii.es.fl_str_mv Ingeniería y Tecnología
Ingeniería del Medio Ambiente
dc.subject.es.fl_str_mv Membrane bioreactor
Reactor Biológico de Membranas
MBR
Slaughterhouse wastewater treatment
Nutrient removal
BioWin
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Evaluation of a MBR for treating slaughterhouse wastewater in Montevideo, Uruguay
dc.type.es.fl_str_mv Tesis de maestría
dc.type.none.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/masterThesis
dc.type.version.es.fl_str_mv Aceptado
dc.type.version.none.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/acceptedVersion
description In Uruguay, the problem of eutrophication of the rivers is every time more concerning. One of the biggest contributors are slaughterhouses, where they usually have ponds treatment system and do not comply with the discharge Standards, especially regarding to nutrients. This research aims to evaluate the performance of a pilot scale membrane bioreactor (MBR) for slaughterhouse wastewater treatment, in order to minimize the impact of their effluent discharge in rivers. It was carried out at one of the main slaughterhouses in Uruguay namely Schneck. The MBR consists on an anoxic compartment followed by one aerobic that contains a recirculation pump in order to recycle to the anoxic. The MBR was placed in order to take its influent from the first step of the treatment plant that was a homogenization basin. After some drawbacks, the MBR was inoculated with a domestic wastewater treatment plant and started operating. Some periods of trials were necessary until it reached a steady state, where it was operated with a recirculation ratio of 4 and an average dissolved oxygen of 3 mg/L, with aeration always on. The MLSS during this period was maintained between 10 and 12 g/L, with a waste flow of around 50 L/d. With these conditions, a total nitrification was achieved, with an average NH4 of 0.74 mgNH4-N/L, while the National discharge Standard limits this value at 5 mgNH4-N/L. Regarding to this parameter, the actual treatment plant was obtaining effluent values between 8 and 79 mgNH4-N/L. The COD and BOD removals in the MBR where higher than 95% with effluent values of BOD below the Standard limit. The only parameter above the Standard was the TP, which average was 14.7mg/L and the limit is 5mg/L (a chemical phosphorous removal should be carried out adding e.g. Ferric Chloride to the MBR). The Nitrate average in the effluent was 24 mg/L and the TN removal was 57.6%, meaning that the denitrification was not completed. Because of that, another trial conditions were investigated, with the same control parameters as the last one except the dissolved oxygen. The aeration was intermittent, turned “on” for 5 minutes and “off” for 15 minutes. The denitrification was enhanced and the total nitrogen removal efficiency reached a value of 78%. However, the NH4 increased to 6.2 mgNH4-N/L. Furthermore, a BioWin model for estimating the optimal location for the MBR at the existing ponds system treatment plant was carried out, considering the N-removal potential in relation to the COD/N influent ratio. The results shows that the best place to situate the MBR inlet is before the homogenization tank, where the COD/TN ratio is 14.0 and the removal TN efficiency is 83.7 %. The second best point for the MBR is after the homogenization tank (COD/TN=11.1), with an efficiency of 72.8 % . For the other points of the treatment plant (after each treatment pond), the COD/N ratio decreases below 6, and the TN removal was reduced at values below 53 %.
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
format masterThesis
id REDI_7881dbf046e10a94284fab20c39381c8
identifier_str_mv Cunha, Nicolas (2016). Evaluation of a MBR for treating slaughterhouse wastewater in Montevideo, Uruguay (tesis de maestría). UNESCO-IHE Institute for Water Education
POS_IHE_2014_1_6
instacron_str Agencia Nacional de Investigación e Innovación
institution Agencia Nacional de Investigación e Innovación
instname_str Agencia Nacional de Investigación e Innovación
language eng
network_acronym_str REDI
network_name_str REDI
oai_identifier_str oai:redi.anii.org.uy:20.500.12381/175
publishDate 2016
reponame_str REDI
repository.mail.fl_str_mv jmaldini@anii.org.uy
repository.name.fl_str_mv REDI - Agencia Nacional de Investigación e Innovación
repository_id_str 9421
rights_invalid_str_mv Reconocimiento 4.0 Internacional. (CC BY)
Acceso abierto
spelling Reconocimiento 4.0 Internacional. (CC BY)Acceso abiertoinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess2019-10-27T11:02:04Z2019-10-27T11:02:04Z2016Cunha, Nicolas (2016). Evaluation of a MBR for treating slaughterhouse wastewater in Montevideo, Uruguay (tesis de maestría). UNESCO-IHE Institute for Water Educationhttp://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12381/175POS_IHE_2014_1_6In Uruguay, the problem of eutrophication of the rivers is every time more concerning. One of the biggest contributors are slaughterhouses, where they usually have ponds treatment system and do not comply with the discharge Standards, especially regarding to nutrients. This research aims to evaluate the performance of a pilot scale membrane bioreactor (MBR) for slaughterhouse wastewater treatment, in order to minimize the impact of their effluent discharge in rivers. It was carried out at one of the main slaughterhouses in Uruguay namely Schneck. The MBR consists on an anoxic compartment followed by one aerobic that contains a recirculation pump in order to recycle to the anoxic. The MBR was placed in order to take its influent from the first step of the treatment plant that was a homogenization basin. After some drawbacks, the MBR was inoculated with a domestic wastewater treatment plant and started operating. Some periods of trials were necessary until it reached a steady state, where it was operated with a recirculation ratio of 4 and an average dissolved oxygen of 3 mg/L, with aeration always on. The MLSS during this period was maintained between 10 and 12 g/L, with a waste flow of around 50 L/d. With these conditions, a total nitrification was achieved, with an average NH4 of 0.74 mgNH4-N/L, while the National discharge Standard limits this value at 5 mgNH4-N/L. Regarding to this parameter, the actual treatment plant was obtaining effluent values between 8 and 79 mgNH4-N/L. The COD and BOD removals in the MBR where higher than 95% with effluent values of BOD below the Standard limit. The only parameter above the Standard was the TP, which average was 14.7mg/L and the limit is 5mg/L (a chemical phosphorous removal should be carried out adding e.g. Ferric Chloride to the MBR). The Nitrate average in the effluent was 24 mg/L and the TN removal was 57.6%, meaning that the denitrification was not completed. Because of that, another trial conditions were investigated, with the same control parameters as the last one except the dissolved oxygen. The aeration was intermittent, turned “on” for 5 minutes and “off” for 15 minutes. The denitrification was enhanced and the total nitrogen removal efficiency reached a value of 78%. However, the NH4 increased to 6.2 mgNH4-N/L. Furthermore, a BioWin model for estimating the optimal location for the MBR at the existing ponds system treatment plant was carried out, considering the N-removal potential in relation to the COD/N influent ratio. The results shows that the best place to situate the MBR inlet is before the homogenization tank, where the COD/TN ratio is 14.0 and the removal TN efficiency is 83.7 %. The second best point for the MBR is after the homogenization tank (COD/TN=11.1), with an efficiency of 72.8 % . For the other points of the treatment plant (after each treatment pond), the COD/N ratio decreases below 6, and the TN removal was reduced at values below 53 %.Agencia Nacional de Investigación e InnovaciónBill and Melinda Gates Foundation74 p.engUNESCO-IHE Institute for Water EducationMembrane bioreactorReactor Biológico de MembranasMBRSlaughterhouse wastewater treatmentNutrient removalBioWinIngeniería y TecnologíaIngeniería del Medio AmbienteEvaluation of a MBR for treating slaughterhouse wastewater in Montevideo, UruguayTesis de maestríaAceptadoinfo:eu-repo/semantics/acceptedVersioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/masterThesisreponame:REDIinstname:Agencia Nacional de Investigación e Innovacióninstacron:Agencia Nacional de Investigación e InnovaciónCunha, NicolasGarcía, HectorHooijmans, TinekeMíguez, DianaLICENSElicense.txtlicense.txttext/plain; charset=utf-84746https://redi.anii.org.uy/jspui/bitstream/20.500.12381/175/2/license.txt2d97768b1a25a7df5a347bb58fd2d77fMD52ORIGINALPOS_IHE_2014_1_6.pdfapplication/pdf3014591https://redi.anii.org.uy/jspui/bitstream/20.500.12381/175/1/POS_IHE_2014_1_6.pdfb29f81b512cd00836014b688ecab9180MD5120.500.12381/1752020-09-18 11:46:00.571oai:redi.anii.org.uy:20.500.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://www.anii.org.uy/https://redi.anii.org.uy/oai/requestjmaldini@anii.org.uyUruguayopendoar:94212020-09-18T14:46REDI - Agencia Nacional de Investigación e Innovaciónfalse
spellingShingle Evaluation of a MBR for treating slaughterhouse wastewater in Montevideo, Uruguay
Cunha, Nicolas
Membrane bioreactor
Reactor Biológico de Membranas
MBR
Slaughterhouse wastewater treatment
Nutrient removal
BioWin
Ingeniería y Tecnología
Ingeniería del Medio Ambiente
status_str acceptedVersion
title Evaluation of a MBR for treating slaughterhouse wastewater in Montevideo, Uruguay
title_full Evaluation of a MBR for treating slaughterhouse wastewater in Montevideo, Uruguay
title_fullStr Evaluation of a MBR for treating slaughterhouse wastewater in Montevideo, Uruguay
title_full_unstemmed Evaluation of a MBR for treating slaughterhouse wastewater in Montevideo, Uruguay
title_short Evaluation of a MBR for treating slaughterhouse wastewater in Montevideo, Uruguay
title_sort Evaluation of a MBR for treating slaughterhouse wastewater in Montevideo, Uruguay
topic Membrane bioreactor
Reactor Biológico de Membranas
MBR
Slaughterhouse wastewater treatment
Nutrient removal
BioWin
Ingeniería y Tecnología
Ingeniería del Medio Ambiente
url http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12381/175