Popular housing, architecture, research and innovation: The Research and Projects Institute and the Popular Housing Research Center of the University of Buenos Aires (1973-1974)
Vivienda popular, arquitectura, investigación e innovación: El Instituto de Investigaciones y Proyectos y el Centro de Investigaciones de la Vivienda Popular de la Universidad de Buenos Aires (1973-1974)
Habitação popular, arquitetura, pesquisa e inovação: O Instituto de Pesquisa e Projetos e o Centro de Pesquisa de Habitação Popular da Universidade de Buenos Aires (1973-1974)
| 2022 | |
|
research innovation University-Society critical architecture popular housing slums and settlements University of Buenos Aires Argentina third peronism seventies investigación innovación Unviersidad-Sociedad Arquitectura critica vivienda popular villas y asentamientos Universidad de Buenos Aires Argentina tercer peronismo años setenta investigação Universidade-Sociedade inovação arquitetura crítica habitação popular vilas e assentamentos Universidade de Buenos Aires Argentina terceiro peronismo setenta |
|
| Español | |
| Universidad ORT Uruguay | |
| RAD | |
|
https://revistas.ort.edu.uy/anales-de-investigacion-en-arquitectura/article/view/3205
http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.11968/4607 |
|
| Acceso abierto | |
|
Derechos de autor 2021 Maria Durante http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0 |
| Sumario: | The case of the Research and Projects Institute (IIP) and the Popular Housing Research Center of the University of Buenos Aires (CIVPUBA), which operated during 1973 and 1974, allows us to see an experience of a scientific-technological institution that addresses the problem of popular habitat in a complex, interdisciplinary and innovative way. Two twinned spaces, within the UBA faculty of architecture, where the research space was articulated with public policy, various civil society organizations and the private sector. A proposal that sought to be in tune with the political project of the third Peronism, but that, at the same time, synthesized a process of discussions and practices developed by a generation of architects that was forged in resistance and in generally marginal places since 1955. This experience allows us to see the fruits of a generation that advances in its reflections and builds concrete proposals; allows you to see a science and technology project articulated with a university project and a society project at the service of the problems of the popular sectors. Experiences that, despite being born in a very different conflictive context, today allow us to recover elements that serve to think about new articulation proposals. |
|---|
