Genesis and architectural development of the Palacio de La Moneda of Chile: Background for a study and practical application of a master plan
Génesis y desarrollo arquitectónico del Palacio de la Moneda de Chile: Antecedentes para un estudio y aplicación práctica de un plan maestro
Génese e desenvolvimento arquitectural do Palacio de La Moneda do Chile: Histórico para um estudo e aplicação prática de um plano mestre
| 2023 | |
|
Joaquin Toesca neoclassical architecture heritage restoration integration sustainability public architecture heritage protection master plan Joaquín Toesca arquitectura neoclásica patrimonio restauración integración sostenibilidad arquitectura pública protección patrimonial plan maestro Joaquin Toesca arquitetura neoclássica patrimônio restauração integração sustentabilidade arquitetura pública proteção patrimonial plano diretor |
|
| Español | |
| Universidad ORT Uruguay | |
| RAD | |
|
https://revistas.ort.edu.uy/anales-de-investigacion-en-arquitectura/article/view/3361
http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.11968/6530 |
|
| Acceso abierto | |
|
Derechos de autor 2022 Katherine Gondeck Cepeda, Gunther Suhrcke Caballero http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0 |
| Sumario: | The Palacio de La Moneda is the seat of the presidency, executive power, and three ministries of Chile. It is constituted one of the main historical buildings in the country and the most important regarding its current representative function, as a government palace. Since its origin, it has been the protagonist of the historical-political and social-urban journey of the nation, facts that have been expressed in its architectural metamorphosis.Designed by the architect Joaquín Toesca and inaugurated in 1805 as the Real Casa de Moneda de Santiago. After independence in 1845, the seat of government was moved to the building, at which time the first important modification of its floor plan was established, with which a dynamic transformation and permanent adaptation began.In its category of architectural heritage, it is essential to understand it as cultural heritage referring to what it symbolizes, and as-built heritage in terms of historical property, its original and current value. |
|---|
