The unconventionality and unconstitutionality of the norms regarding adolescents in conflict with the criminal law contained in Law No. 19.889, sanctioned by the procedure of declaration of urgent consideration

La inconvencionalidad e inconstitucionalidad de las normas en materia de adolescentes en conflicto con la ley penal contenidas en la Ley N.° 19.889, sancionada por el procedimiento de declaratoria de urgente consideración

Rodríguez Almada, Pablo
Detalles Bibliográficos
2021
inconvencionalidad
adolescentes en conflicto con la ley penal
privación de libertad
principio de excepcionalidad
principio de no regresividad
principio de proporcionalidad
unconventionality
unconstitutionality
adolescents in conflict with criminal law
deprivation of liberty
principle of exceptionality
principle of non-regressivity
principle of proportionality
Español
Universidad Católica del Uruguay
LIBERI
https://revistas.ucu.edu.uy/index.php/revistadederecho/article/view/2549
https://hdl.handle.net/10895/4223
Acceso abierto
_version_ 1815178718381867008
author Rodríguez Almada, Pablo
author_facet Rodríguez Almada, Pablo
author_role author
collection LIBERI
dc.creator.none.fl_str_mv Rodríguez Almada, Pablo
dc.date.accessioned.none.fl_str_mv 2023-09-13T13:12:49Z
dc.date.available.none.fl_str_mv 2023-09-13T13:12:49Z
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2021-06-11
dc.description.en-US.fl_txt_mv Law No. 19,889 dated July 9, 2020, sanctioned by the procedure of bill with declaration of urgent consideration established in Article 168 numeral 7° of the Constitution, modified articles of the Childhood and Adolescence Code referring to adolescents in conflict with criminal law. This article will analyze these modifications, contrasting them with international conventions and covenants, other international human rights instruments, with the jurisprudence of the Inter-American Court of Human Rights and with the Constitution of Uruguay. It is observed that the amendments referring to adolescents in conflict with criminal law contained in Law No. 19,889 are regressive and violate principles enshrined in the Convention on the Rights of the Child, the American Convention on Human Rights, the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights, the Vienna Convention on the Law of Treaties, the Beijing Rules, the Havana Rules, the Riyadh Guidelines and norms of the Constitution. It is concluded that the legal norms related to adolescents in conflict with the criminal law that modified the Code of Childhood and Adolescence are unconventional and unconstitutional.
dc.description.es-ES.fl_txt_mv La Ley N° 19.889 de fecha 9 de julio de 2020, sancionada por el procedimiento de proyecto de ley con declaratoria de urgente consideración consagrado en el artículo 168 numeral 7° de la Constitución, modificó artículos del Código de la Niñez y la Adolescencia referidos a los adolescentes en conflicto con la ley penal. El presente artículo analizará dichas modificaciones contrastándolas con convenciones y pactos internacionales, otros instrumentos internacionales de derechos humanos, con la jurisprudencia de la Corte Interamericana de Derechos Humanos y con la Constitución de Uruguay. Se observa que las modificaciones referidas a adolescentes en conflicto con la ley penal consagradas por la Ley N° 19.889 son regresivas y violatorias de principios consagrados en la Convención sobre los Derechos del Niño, la Convención Americana de Derechos Humanos, el Pacto Internacional de Derechos Civiles y Políticos, la Convención de Viena Sobre el Derecho de los Tratados, las Reglas de Beijing, las Reglas de La Habana, las Directrices de Riad y normas de la Constitución. Se concluye que las normas jurídicas relativas a los adolescentes en conflicto con la ley penal que modificaron el Código de la Niñez y la Adolescencia son inconvencionales e inconstitucionales.
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
dc.identifier.none.fl_str_mv https://revistas.ucu.edu.uy/index.php/revistadederecho/article/view/2549
10.22235/rd23.2549
dc.identifier.uri.none.fl_str_mv https://hdl.handle.net/10895/4223
dc.language.iso.none.fl_str_mv spa
dc.publisher.es-ES.fl_str_mv Universidad Católica del Uruguay
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv https://revistas.ucu.edu.uy/index.php/revistadederecho/article/view/2549/2358
dc.rights.es-ES.fl_str_mv http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0
dc.rights.none.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
dc.source.en-US.fl_str_mv Revista de Derecho; No. 23 (2021): Revista de Derecho ; 49-84
dc.source.es-ES.fl_str_mv Revista de Derecho; Núm. 23 (2021): Revista de Derecho ; 49-84
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv 2393-6193
1510-3714
10.22235/rd23
reponame:LIBERI
instname:Universidad Católica del Uruguay
instacron:Universidad Católica del Uruguay
dc.source.pt-PT.fl_str_mv Revista de Derecho; N.º 23 (2021): Revista de Derecho ; 49-84
dc.subject.en-US.fl_str_mv unconventionality
unconstitutionality
adolescents in conflict with criminal law
deprivation of liberty
principle of exceptionality
principle of non-regressivity
principle of proportionality
dc.subject.es-ES.fl_str_mv inconvencionalidad
adolescentes en conflicto con la ley penal
privación de libertad
principio de excepcionalidad
principio de no regresividad
principio de proporcionalidad
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv The unconventionality and unconstitutionality of the norms regarding adolescents in conflict with the criminal law contained in Law No. 19.889, sanctioned by the procedure of declaration of urgent consideration
La inconvencionalidad e inconstitucionalidad de las normas en materia de adolescentes en conflicto con la ley penal contenidas en la Ley N.° 19.889, sancionada por el procedimiento de declaratoria de urgente consideración
dc.type.en-US.fl_str_mv Papers evaluated by peers
dc.type.es-ES.fl_str_mv Artículos evaluados por pares
dc.type.none.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
dc.type.pt-PT.fl_str_mv Avaliados por pares
dc.type.version.none.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
description Law No. 19,889 dated July 9, 2020, sanctioned by the procedure of bill with declaration of urgent consideration established in Article 168 numeral 7° of the Constitution, modified articles of the Childhood and Adolescence Code referring to adolescents in conflict with criminal law. This article will analyze these modifications, contrasting them with international conventions and covenants, other international human rights instruments, with the jurisprudence of the Inter-American Court of Human Rights and with the Constitution of Uruguay. It is observed that the amendments referring to adolescents in conflict with criminal law contained in Law No. 19,889 are regressive and violate principles enshrined in the Convention on the Rights of the Child, the American Convention on Human Rights, the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights, the Vienna Convention on the Law of Treaties, the Beijing Rules, the Havana Rules, the Riyadh Guidelines and norms of the Constitution. It is concluded that the legal norms related to adolescents in conflict with the criminal law that modified the Code of Childhood and Adolescence are unconventional and unconstitutional.
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
format article
id LIBERI_f56489a5ed126dd36d1bcf22985d4f58
identifier_str_mv 10.22235/rd23.2549
instacron_str Universidad Católica del Uruguay
institution Universidad Católica del Uruguay
instname_str Universidad Católica del Uruguay
language spa
network_acronym_str LIBERI
network_name_str LIBERI
oai_identifier_str oai:liberi.ucu.edu.uy:10895/4223
publishDate 2021
reponame_str LIBERI
repository.mail.fl_str_mv franco.pertusso@ucu.edu.uy
repository.name.fl_str_mv LIBERI - Universidad Católica del Uruguay
repository_id_str 10342
rights_invalid_str_mv http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0
spelling Rodríguez Almada, Pablo2021-06-112023-09-13T13:12:49Z2023-09-13T13:12:49Zhttps://revistas.ucu.edu.uy/index.php/revistadederecho/article/view/254910.22235/rd23.2549https://hdl.handle.net/10895/4223Law No. 19,889 dated July 9, 2020, sanctioned by the procedure of bill with declaration of urgent consideration established in Article 168 numeral 7° of the Constitution, modified articles of the Childhood and Adolescence Code referring to adolescents in conflict with criminal law. This article will analyze these modifications, contrasting them with international conventions and covenants, other international human rights instruments, with the jurisprudence of the Inter-American Court of Human Rights and with the Constitution of Uruguay. It is observed that the amendments referring to adolescents in conflict with criminal law contained in Law No. 19,889 are regressive and violate principles enshrined in the Convention on the Rights of the Child, the American Convention on Human Rights, the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights, the Vienna Convention on the Law of Treaties, the Beijing Rules, the Havana Rules, the Riyadh Guidelines and norms of the Constitution. It is concluded that the legal norms related to adolescents in conflict with the criminal law that modified the Code of Childhood and Adolescence are unconventional and unconstitutional.La Ley N° 19.889 de fecha 9 de julio de 2020, sancionada por el procedimiento de proyecto de ley con declaratoria de urgente consideración consagrado en el artículo 168 numeral 7° de la Constitución, modificó artículos del Código de la Niñez y la Adolescencia referidos a los adolescentes en conflicto con la ley penal. El presente artículo analizará dichas modificaciones contrastándolas con convenciones y pactos internacionales, otros instrumentos internacionales de derechos humanos, con la jurisprudencia de la Corte Interamericana de Derechos Humanos y con la Constitución de Uruguay. Se observa que las modificaciones referidas a adolescentes en conflicto con la ley penal consagradas por la Ley N° 19.889 son regresivas y violatorias de principios consagrados en la Convención sobre los Derechos del Niño, la Convención Americana de Derechos Humanos, el Pacto Internacional de Derechos Civiles y Políticos, la Convención de Viena Sobre el Derecho de los Tratados, las Reglas de Beijing, las Reglas de La Habana, las Directrices de Riad y normas de la Constitución. Se concluye que las normas jurídicas relativas a los adolescentes en conflicto con la ley penal que modificaron el Código de la Niñez y la Adolescencia son inconvencionales e inconstitucionales.application/pdfspaUniversidad Católica del Uruguayhttps://revistas.ucu.edu.uy/index.php/revistadederecho/article/view/2549/2358http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessRevista de Derecho; No. 23 (2021): Revista de Derecho ; 49-84Revista de Derecho; Núm. 23 (2021): Revista de Derecho ; 49-84Revista de Derecho; N.º 23 (2021): Revista de Derecho ; 49-842393-61931510-371410.22235/rd23reponame:LIBERIinstname:Universidad Católica del Uruguayinstacron:Universidad Católica del Uruguayinconvencionalidadadolescentes en conflicto con la ley penalprivación de libertadprincipio de excepcionalidadprincipio de no regresividadprincipio de proporcionalidadunconventionalityunconstitutionalityadolescents in conflict with criminal lawdeprivation of libertyprinciple of exceptionalityprinciple of non-regressivityprinciple of proportionalityThe unconventionality and unconstitutionality of the norms regarding adolescents in conflict with the criminal law contained in Law No. 19.889, sanctioned by the procedure of declaration of urgent considerationLa inconvencionalidad e inconstitucionalidad de las normas en materia de adolescentes en conflicto con la ley penal contenidas en la Ley N.° 19.889, sancionada por el procedimiento de declaratoria de urgente consideracióninfo:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionPapers evaluated by peersArtículos evaluados por paresAvaliados por paresinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion10895/42232023-09-13 10:12:49.394oai:liberi.ucu.edu.uy:10895/4223Universidadhttps://www.ucu.edu.uy/https://liberi.ucu.edu.uy/oai/requestfranco.pertusso@ucu.edu.uyUruguayopendoar:103422023-09-13T13:12:49LIBERI - Universidad Católica del Uruguayfalse
spellingShingle The unconventionality and unconstitutionality of the norms regarding adolescents in conflict with the criminal law contained in Law No. 19.889, sanctioned by the procedure of declaration of urgent consideration
Rodríguez Almada, Pablo
inconvencionalidad
adolescentes en conflicto con la ley penal
privación de libertad
principio de excepcionalidad
principio de no regresividad
principio de proporcionalidad
unconventionality
unconstitutionality
adolescents in conflict with criminal law
deprivation of liberty
principle of exceptionality
principle of non-regressivity
principle of proportionality
status_str publishedVersion
title The unconventionality and unconstitutionality of the norms regarding adolescents in conflict with the criminal law contained in Law No. 19.889, sanctioned by the procedure of declaration of urgent consideration
title_full The unconventionality and unconstitutionality of the norms regarding adolescents in conflict with the criminal law contained in Law No. 19.889, sanctioned by the procedure of declaration of urgent consideration
title_fullStr The unconventionality and unconstitutionality of the norms regarding adolescents in conflict with the criminal law contained in Law No. 19.889, sanctioned by the procedure of declaration of urgent consideration
title_full_unstemmed The unconventionality and unconstitutionality of the norms regarding adolescents in conflict with the criminal law contained in Law No. 19.889, sanctioned by the procedure of declaration of urgent consideration
title_short The unconventionality and unconstitutionality of the norms regarding adolescents in conflict with the criminal law contained in Law No. 19.889, sanctioned by the procedure of declaration of urgent consideration
title_sort The unconventionality and unconstitutionality of the norms regarding adolescents in conflict with the criminal law contained in Law No. 19.889, sanctioned by the procedure of declaration of urgent consideration
topic inconvencionalidad
adolescentes en conflicto con la ley penal
privación de libertad
principio de excepcionalidad
principio de no regresividad
principio de proporcionalidad
unconventionality
unconstitutionality
adolescents in conflict with criminal law
deprivation of liberty
principle of exceptionality
principle of non-regressivity
principle of proportionality
url https://revistas.ucu.edu.uy/index.php/revistadederecho/article/view/2549
https://hdl.handle.net/10895/4223