The international regime of filiation and human rights: dialogue of sources.
El régimen internacional de la filiación y los derechos humanos: el diálogo de las fuentes.
2016 | |
derechos humanos filiación tratado derecho internacional privado armonización human rights filiation treaty international private law harmonization |
|
Español | |
Universidad Católica del Uruguay | |
LIBERI | |
https://revistas.ucu.edu.uy/index.php/revistadederecho/article/view/860
https://hdl.handle.net/10895/4109 |
|
Acceso abierto |
_version_ | 1815178716564684800 |
---|---|
author | Fresnedo de Aguirre, Cecilia |
author_facet | Fresnedo de Aguirre, Cecilia |
author_role | author |
collection | LIBERI |
dc.creator.none.fl_str_mv | Fresnedo de Aguirre, Cecilia |
dc.date.accessioned.none.fl_str_mv | 2023-09-13T13:11:39Z |
dc.date.available.none.fl_str_mv | 2023-09-13T13:11:39Z |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv | 2016-01-31 |
dc.description.en-US.fl_txt_mv | Abstract. As regards filiation, different types of regulations co-exist within the Uruguayanlegal system: based on internal or international sources, on material or conflict sources,drawn up since the 19th century to this day, regulations which reflect prevailing legislativepolicies at the time in the national, regional or universal societies. Some regulations makea severe distinction between different types of filiation – especially between legitimate and illegitimate filiation – and put forward discriminatory solutions, while others establish theobligation to recognize equal rights for all children, them having been born in or out ofwedlock. The content of these sources is analyzed in this paper, how they interact, what the national and the international legislator has done and will have to do as regards this subject, as well as the role played by the judge when it comes to interpreting and applying International Private Law regulations on filiation, taking into account human rights conventions, the role of the Vienna Convention on the Law of Treaties, the effect of the supervening ius cogens in the Treaties on International Civil Law of Montevideo of 1889 and 1940, as well as in the International Private Law based on internal sources and the consequences of the criteria proposed. |
dc.description.es-ES.fl_txt_mv | Resumen. En materia de filiación, en el ordenamiento jurídico uruguayo coexisten normasde diversa índole: de fuente interna o internacional, materiales o de conflicto, elaboradasdesde el siglo XIX hasta nuestros días, cada una de las cuales refleja las políticas legislativasimperantes en su momento en la sociedad nacional, regional o universal. Algunas discriminan gravemente entre distintos tipos filiatorios —en especial, la filiación legítima y la ilegítima— y establecen soluciones también discriminatorias, mientras que otras imponen la obligación de reconocer los mismos derechos a los niños nacidos dentro o fuera del matrimonio. Se analiza aquí el contenido de dichas fuentes, cómo operan entre sí, qué ha hecho y qué deberá hacer el legislador nacional e internacional en la materia, así como el papel del juez a la hora de interpretar y aplicar las normas de DIPr sobre filiación, teniendo en cuenta las convenciones sobre derechos humanos, el papel de la Convención de Viena sobre Derecho de los Tratados, la incidencia del ius cogens superviniente en los Tratados de Derecho Civil Internacional de Montevideo de 1889 y de 1940, así como en el DIPr de fuente interna y las consecuencias de los criterios propuestos. |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv | application/pdf |
dc.identifier.none.fl_str_mv | https://revistas.ucu.edu.uy/index.php/revistadederecho/article/view/860 10.22235/rd.v0i1.860 |
dc.identifier.uri.none.fl_str_mv | https://hdl.handle.net/10895/4109 |
dc.language.iso.none.fl_str_mv | spa |
dc.publisher.es-ES.fl_str_mv | Universidad Católica del Uruguay |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv | https://revistas.ucu.edu.uy/index.php/revistadederecho/article/view/860/863 |
dc.rights.es-ES.fl_str_mv | Derechos de autor 2016 Revista de Derecho |
dc.rights.none.fl_str_mv | info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
dc.source.en-US.fl_str_mv | Revista de Derecho; No. 1 (2006): Revista de Derecho; 155-187 |
dc.source.es-ES.fl_str_mv | Revista de Derecho; Núm. 1 (2006): Revista de Derecho; 155-187 |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv | 2393-6193 1510-3714 10.22235/rd.v0i1 reponame:LIBERI instname:Universidad Católica del Uruguay instacron:Universidad Católica del Uruguay |
dc.source.pt-PT.fl_str_mv | Revista de Derecho; N.º 1 (2006): Revista de Derecho; 155-187 |
dc.subject.en-US.fl_str_mv | human rights filiation treaty international private law harmonization |
dc.subject.es-ES.fl_str_mv | derechos humanos filiación tratado derecho internacional privado armonización |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv | The international regime of filiation and human rights: dialogue of sources. El régimen internacional de la filiación y los derechos humanos: el diálogo de las fuentes. |
dc.type.en-US.fl_str_mv | Papers evaluated by peers |
dc.type.es-ES.fl_str_mv | Artículos evaluados por pares |
dc.type.none.fl_str_mv | info:eu-repo/semantics/article info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion |
dc.type.pt-PT.fl_str_mv | Avaliados por pares |
dc.type.version.none.fl_str_mv | info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion |
description | Abstract. As regards filiation, different types of regulations co-exist within the Uruguayanlegal system: based on internal or international sources, on material or conflict sources,drawn up since the 19th century to this day, regulations which reflect prevailing legislativepolicies at the time in the national, regional or universal societies. Some regulations makea severe distinction between different types of filiation – especially between legitimate and illegitimate filiation – and put forward discriminatory solutions, while others establish theobligation to recognize equal rights for all children, them having been born in or out ofwedlock. The content of these sources is analyzed in this paper, how they interact, what the national and the international legislator has done and will have to do as regards this subject, as well as the role played by the judge when it comes to interpreting and applying International Private Law regulations on filiation, taking into account human rights conventions, the role of the Vienna Convention on the Law of Treaties, the effect of the supervening ius cogens in the Treaties on International Civil Law of Montevideo of 1889 and 1940, as well as in the International Private Law based on internal sources and the consequences of the criteria proposed. |
eu_rights_str_mv | openAccess |
format | article |
id | LIBERI_c379303441e77910bd955c315980e6af |
identifier_str_mv | 10.22235/rd.v0i1.860 |
instacron_str | Universidad Católica del Uruguay |
institution | Universidad Católica del Uruguay |
instname_str | Universidad Católica del Uruguay |
language | spa |
network_acronym_str | LIBERI |
network_name_str | LIBERI |
oai_identifier_str | oai:liberi.ucu.edu.uy:10895/4109 |
publishDate | 2016 |
reponame_str | LIBERI |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv | franco.pertusso@ucu.edu.uy |
repository.name.fl_str_mv | LIBERI - Universidad Católica del Uruguay |
repository_id_str | 10342 |
rights_invalid_str_mv | Derechos de autor 2016 Revista de Derecho |
spelling | Fresnedo de Aguirre, Cecilia2016-01-312023-09-13T13:11:39Z2023-09-13T13:11:39Zhttps://revistas.ucu.edu.uy/index.php/revistadederecho/article/view/86010.22235/rd.v0i1.860https://hdl.handle.net/10895/4109Abstract. As regards filiation, different types of regulations co-exist within the Uruguayanlegal system: based on internal or international sources, on material or conflict sources,drawn up since the 19th century to this day, regulations which reflect prevailing legislativepolicies at the time in the national, regional or universal societies. Some regulations makea severe distinction between different types of filiation – especially between legitimate and illegitimate filiation – and put forward discriminatory solutions, while others establish theobligation to recognize equal rights for all children, them having been born in or out ofwedlock. The content of these sources is analyzed in this paper, how they interact, what the national and the international legislator has done and will have to do as regards this subject, as well as the role played by the judge when it comes to interpreting and applying International Private Law regulations on filiation, taking into account human rights conventions, the role of the Vienna Convention on the Law of Treaties, the effect of the supervening ius cogens in the Treaties on International Civil Law of Montevideo of 1889 and 1940, as well as in the International Private Law based on internal sources and the consequences of the criteria proposed.Resumen. En materia de filiación, en el ordenamiento jurídico uruguayo coexisten normasde diversa índole: de fuente interna o internacional, materiales o de conflicto, elaboradasdesde el siglo XIX hasta nuestros días, cada una de las cuales refleja las políticas legislativasimperantes en su momento en la sociedad nacional, regional o universal. Algunas discriminan gravemente entre distintos tipos filiatorios —en especial, la filiación legítima y la ilegítima— y establecen soluciones también discriminatorias, mientras que otras imponen la obligación de reconocer los mismos derechos a los niños nacidos dentro o fuera del matrimonio. Se analiza aquí el contenido de dichas fuentes, cómo operan entre sí, qué ha hecho y qué deberá hacer el legislador nacional e internacional en la materia, así como el papel del juez a la hora de interpretar y aplicar las normas de DIPr sobre filiación, teniendo en cuenta las convenciones sobre derechos humanos, el papel de la Convención de Viena sobre Derecho de los Tratados, la incidencia del ius cogens superviniente en los Tratados de Derecho Civil Internacional de Montevideo de 1889 y de 1940, así como en el DIPr de fuente interna y las consecuencias de los criterios propuestos.application/pdfspaUniversidad Católica del Uruguayhttps://revistas.ucu.edu.uy/index.php/revistadederecho/article/view/860/863Derechos de autor 2016 Revista de Derechoinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessRevista de Derecho; No. 1 (2006): Revista de Derecho; 155-187Revista de Derecho; Núm. 1 (2006): Revista de Derecho; 155-187Revista de Derecho; N.º 1 (2006): Revista de Derecho; 155-1872393-61931510-371410.22235/rd.v0i1reponame:LIBERIinstname:Universidad Católica del Uruguayinstacron:Universidad Católica del Uruguayderechos humanosfiliacióntratadoderecho internacional privadoarmonizaciónhuman rightsfiliationtreatyinternational private lawharmonizationThe international regime of filiation and human rights: dialogue of sources.El régimen internacional de la filiación y los derechos humanos: el diálogo de las fuentes.info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionPapers evaluated by peersArtículos evaluados por paresAvaliados por paresinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion10895/41092023-09-13 10:11:39.796oai:liberi.ucu.edu.uy:10895/4109Universidadhttps://www.ucu.edu.uy/https://liberi.ucu.edu.uy/oai/requestfranco.pertusso@ucu.edu.uyUruguayopendoar:103422023-09-13T13:11:39LIBERI - Universidad Católica del Uruguayfalse |
spellingShingle | The international regime of filiation and human rights: dialogue of sources. Fresnedo de Aguirre, Cecilia derechos humanos filiación tratado derecho internacional privado armonización human rights filiation treaty international private law harmonization |
status_str | publishedVersion |
title | The international regime of filiation and human rights: dialogue of sources. |
title_full | The international regime of filiation and human rights: dialogue of sources. |
title_fullStr | The international regime of filiation and human rights: dialogue of sources. |
title_full_unstemmed | The international regime of filiation and human rights: dialogue of sources. |
title_short | The international regime of filiation and human rights: dialogue of sources. |
title_sort | The international regime of filiation and human rights: dialogue of sources. |
topic | derechos humanos filiación tratado derecho internacional privado armonización human rights filiation treaty international private law harmonization |
url | https://revistas.ucu.edu.uy/index.php/revistadederecho/article/view/860 https://hdl.handle.net/10895/4109 |