Enemy Criminal Law and the unacceptable disregard for the Principle of Human Dignity.
El derecho penal del enemigo y la inexcusable vigencia del principio de la dignidad de la persona humana.
| 2016 | |
|
criminal law criminal procedure constitutional law judicial guarantee of rights rule of law functionalism persons (law) democratic criminal principles rights in rem derecho penal proceso penal derecho constitucional garantía judicial de los derechos estado de derecho funcionalismo personas (derecho) principios penales democráticos garantías reales |
|
| Español | |
| Universidad Católica del Uruguay | |
| LIBERI | |
|
https://revistas.ucu.edu.uy/index.php/revistadederecho/article/view/815
https://hdl.handle.net/10895/4072 |
|
| Acceso abierto |
| _version_ | 1815178716621307904 |
|---|---|
| author | Cervini, Raúl |
| author_facet | Cervini, Raúl |
| author_role | author |
| collection | LIBERI |
| dc.creator.none.fl_str_mv | Cervini, Raúl |
| dc.date.accessioned.none.fl_str_mv | 2023-09-13T13:11:03Z |
| dc.date.available.none.fl_str_mv | 2023-09-13T13:11:03Z |
| dc.date.none.fl_str_mv | 2016-01-30 |
| dc.description.en-US.fl_txt_mv | Abstract. The author analyzes the assumptions and intradogmatic consequences of the so-called Enemy Criminal Law by studying the texts of Professor Jakobs, and confronting them with the criminal paradigms of a State of Law. The objective transcript of the texts written by this Bonn’s Professor evidences that its promotional functionalist strategy has clear effects on the field of substantive and procedural safeguards; in particular, his concepts of “person” and “enemy” are radically inconsistent with the principles of an anthropological view of Criminal Law, which does not admit the possibility of excluding a segment of citizens from the general system of democratic guarantees and manifests an unacceptable disregard of Human Dignity, the basic value which the Democratic State of Law seeks to protect. |
| dc.description.es-ES.fl_txt_mv | Resumen. El autor analiza los postulados y consecuencias intradogmáticas del llamado derecho penal del enemigo a partir de los textos del profesor Jakobs y los confronta con los paradigmas penales propios del Estado de derecho. La transcripción objetiva de los textos del profesor de Bonn pone en evidencia que su estrategia promocional funcionalista tiene claros efectos en el campo de las garantías sustantivas y procesales penales; en particular sus conceptos de persona y de enemigo contradicen radicalmente los postulados de un derecho penal de vertiente antropológica, que no admite la posibilidad de que exista un segmento de ciudadanos excluidos del sistema general de garantías democráticas, y trasunta finalmente un inadmisible desconocimiento de la dignidad de la persona humana, eje de la estructura de valores que procura efectivizar el Estado democrático de derecho. |
| dc.format.none.fl_str_mv | application/pdf |
| dc.identifier.none.fl_str_mv | https://revistas.ucu.edu.uy/index.php/revistadederecho/article/view/815 10.22235/rd.v0i5.815 |
| dc.identifier.uri.none.fl_str_mv | https://hdl.handle.net/10895/4072 |
| dc.language.iso.none.fl_str_mv | spa |
| dc.publisher.es-ES.fl_str_mv | Universidad Católica del Uruguay |
| dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv | https://revistas.ucu.edu.uy/index.php/revistadederecho/article/view/815/817 |
| dc.rights.es-ES.fl_str_mv | Derechos de autor 2016 Revista de Derecho |
| dc.rights.none.fl_str_mv | info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
| dc.source.en-US.fl_str_mv | Revista de Derecho; No. 5 (2010): Revista de Derecho; 27-50 |
| dc.source.es-ES.fl_str_mv | Revista de Derecho; Núm. 5 (2010): Revista de Derecho; 27-50 |
| dc.source.none.fl_str_mv | 2393-6193 1510-3714 10.22235/rd.v0i5 reponame:LIBERI instname:Universidad Católica del Uruguay instacron:Universidad Católica del Uruguay |
| dc.source.pt-PT.fl_str_mv | Revista de Derecho; N.º 5 (2010): Revista de Derecho; 27-50 |
| dc.subject.en-US.fl_str_mv | criminal law criminal procedure constitutional law judicial guarantee of rights rule of law functionalism persons (law) democratic criminal principles rights in rem |
| dc.subject.es-ES.fl_str_mv | derecho penal proceso penal derecho constitucional garantía judicial de los derechos estado de derecho funcionalismo personas (derecho) principios penales democráticos garantías reales |
| dc.title.none.fl_str_mv | Enemy Criminal Law and the unacceptable disregard for the Principle of Human Dignity. El derecho penal del enemigo y la inexcusable vigencia del principio de la dignidad de la persona humana. |
| dc.type.en-US.fl_str_mv | Papers evaluated by peers |
| dc.type.es-ES.fl_str_mv | Artículos evaluados por pares |
| dc.type.none.fl_str_mv | info:eu-repo/semantics/article info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion |
| dc.type.pt-PT.fl_str_mv | Avaliados por pares |
| dc.type.version.none.fl_str_mv | info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion |
| description | Abstract. The author analyzes the assumptions and intradogmatic consequences of the so-called Enemy Criminal Law by studying the texts of Professor Jakobs, and confronting them with the criminal paradigms of a State of Law. The objective transcript of the texts written by this Bonn’s Professor evidences that its promotional functionalist strategy has clear effects on the field of substantive and procedural safeguards; in particular, his concepts of “person” and “enemy” are radically inconsistent with the principles of an anthropological view of Criminal Law, which does not admit the possibility of excluding a segment of citizens from the general system of democratic guarantees and manifests an unacceptable disregard of Human Dignity, the basic value which the Democratic State of Law seeks to protect. |
| eu_rights_str_mv | openAccess |
| format | article |
| id | LIBERI_b1c82d4f468e225b1f8e6b8e428515c7 |
| identifier_str_mv | 10.22235/rd.v0i5.815 |
| instacron_str | Universidad Católica del Uruguay |
| institution | Universidad Católica del Uruguay |
| instname_str | Universidad Católica del Uruguay |
| language | spa |
| network_acronym_str | LIBERI |
| network_name_str | LIBERI |
| oai_identifier_str | oai:liberi.ucu.edu.uy:10895/4072 |
| publishDate | 2016 |
| reponame_str | LIBERI |
| repository.mail.fl_str_mv | franco.pertusso@ucu.edu.uy |
| repository.name.fl_str_mv | LIBERI - Universidad Católica del Uruguay |
| repository_id_str | 10342 |
| rights_invalid_str_mv | Derechos de autor 2016 Revista de Derecho |
| spelling | Cervini, Raúl2016-01-302023-09-13T13:11:03Z2023-09-13T13:11:03Zhttps://revistas.ucu.edu.uy/index.php/revistadederecho/article/view/81510.22235/rd.v0i5.815https://hdl.handle.net/10895/4072Abstract. The author analyzes the assumptions and intradogmatic consequences of the so-called Enemy Criminal Law by studying the texts of Professor Jakobs, and confronting them with the criminal paradigms of a State of Law. The objective transcript of the texts written by this Bonn’s Professor evidences that its promotional functionalist strategy has clear effects on the field of substantive and procedural safeguards; in particular, his concepts of “person” and “enemy” are radically inconsistent with the principles of an anthropological view of Criminal Law, which does not admit the possibility of excluding a segment of citizens from the general system of democratic guarantees and manifests an unacceptable disregard of Human Dignity, the basic value which the Democratic State of Law seeks to protect.Resumen. El autor analiza los postulados y consecuencias intradogmáticas del llamado derecho penal del enemigo a partir de los textos del profesor Jakobs y los confronta con los paradigmas penales propios del Estado de derecho. La transcripción objetiva de los textos del profesor de Bonn pone en evidencia que su estrategia promocional funcionalista tiene claros efectos en el campo de las garantías sustantivas y procesales penales; en particular sus conceptos de persona y de enemigo contradicen radicalmente los postulados de un derecho penal de vertiente antropológica, que no admite la posibilidad de que exista un segmento de ciudadanos excluidos del sistema general de garantías democráticas, y trasunta finalmente un inadmisible desconocimiento de la dignidad de la persona humana, eje de la estructura de valores que procura efectivizar el Estado democrático de derecho.application/pdfspaUniversidad Católica del Uruguayhttps://revistas.ucu.edu.uy/index.php/revistadederecho/article/view/815/817Derechos de autor 2016 Revista de Derechoinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessRevista de Derecho; No. 5 (2010): Revista de Derecho; 27-50Revista de Derecho; Núm. 5 (2010): Revista de Derecho; 27-50Revista de Derecho; N.º 5 (2010): Revista de Derecho; 27-502393-61931510-371410.22235/rd.v0i5reponame:LIBERIinstname:Universidad Católica del Uruguayinstacron:Universidad Católica del Uruguaycriminal lawcriminal procedureconstitutional lawjudicial guarantee of rightsrule of lawfunctionalismpersons (law)democratic criminal principlesrights in remderecho penalproceso penalderecho constitucionalgarantía judicial de los derechosestado de derechofuncionalismopersonas (derecho)principios penales democráticosgarantías realesEnemy Criminal Law and the unacceptable disregard for the Principle of Human Dignity.El derecho penal del enemigo y la inexcusable vigencia del principio de la dignidad de la persona humana.info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionPapers evaluated by peersArtículos evaluados por paresAvaliados por paresinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion10895/40722023-09-13 10:11:03.206oai:liberi.ucu.edu.uy:10895/4072Universidadhttps://www.ucu.edu.uy/https://liberi.ucu.edu.uy/oai/requestfranco.pertusso@ucu.edu.uyUruguayopendoar:103422023-09-13T13:11:03LIBERI - Universidad Católica del Uruguayfalse |
| spellingShingle | Enemy Criminal Law and the unacceptable disregard for the Principle of Human Dignity. Cervini, Raúl criminal law criminal procedure constitutional law judicial guarantee of rights rule of law functionalism persons (law) democratic criminal principles rights in rem derecho penal proceso penal derecho constitucional garantía judicial de los derechos estado de derecho funcionalismo personas (derecho) principios penales democráticos garantías reales |
| status_str | publishedVersion |
| title | Enemy Criminal Law and the unacceptable disregard for the Principle of Human Dignity. |
| title_full | Enemy Criminal Law and the unacceptable disregard for the Principle of Human Dignity. |
| title_fullStr | Enemy Criminal Law and the unacceptable disregard for the Principle of Human Dignity. |
| title_full_unstemmed | Enemy Criminal Law and the unacceptable disregard for the Principle of Human Dignity. |
| title_short | Enemy Criminal Law and the unacceptable disregard for the Principle of Human Dignity. |
| title_sort | Enemy Criminal Law and the unacceptable disregard for the Principle of Human Dignity. |
| topic | criminal law criminal procedure constitutional law judicial guarantee of rights rule of law functionalism persons (law) democratic criminal principles rights in rem derecho penal proceso penal derecho constitucional garantía judicial de los derechos estado de derecho funcionalismo personas (derecho) principios penales democráticos garantías reales |
| url | https://revistas.ucu.edu.uy/index.php/revistadederecho/article/view/815 https://hdl.handle.net/10895/4072 |
