The role of the Guarantee Judge in Personal Precautionary Measures Hearings: A Normative Review of the Criminal Procedural Systems in Chile, Uruguay, and Federal Argentina
El rol del juez de garantía en el debate de medidas cautelares personales. Revisión normativa de los sistemas procesales penales de Chile, Uruguay y Argentina federal
O papel do juiz de garantias no debate de medidas cautelares pessoais. Revisão normativa dos sistemas processuais penais do Chile, Uruguai e Argentina federal
| 2024 | |
|
criminal procedure guarantee judge personal precautionary measures pre-trial detention proceso penal juez de garantía medidas cautelares personales prisión preventiva processo penal juiz das garantias medidas cautelares prisão preventiva |
|
| Español | |
| Universidad Católica del Uruguay | |
| LIBERI | |
| https://revistas.ucu.edu.uy/index.php/revistadederecho/article/view/3961 | |
| Acceso abierto |
| Sumario: | The functions that guarantee or control courts must fulfill in adversarial accusatory models are crucial for the proper protection of the rights and guarantees of all participants, especially the defendant and the accused. These functions are critical to the debates regarding the appropriateness of personal precautionary measures and require the judge to strictly observe the principles governing such measures and to justify how these principles are applied in each case. Supervisory courts must define and clearly state the standards required for each type of personal precautionary measure requested by the litigants and must reproduce in their rulings the criteria employed and the reasoning used to either confirm or dismiss the requirements of the personal precautionary measures, such as their material prerequisites and the necessity for caution. |
|---|
