Appeal: incorrect inadmissibility.
Recurso de Casación: Errónea inadmisibilidad.
| 2016 | |
|
formal procedural requirements of procedural acts procedural acts control of admissibility of procedural acts appeal inadmissibility of recourse of appeal requisitos procesales formales de los actos procesales actos procesales control de admisibilidad de actos procesales recurso de casación inadmisibilidad de recurso de casación |
|
| Español | |
| Universidad Católica del Uruguay | |
| LIBERI | |
|
https://revistas.ucu.edu.uy/index.php/revistadederecho/article/view/1127
https://hdl.handle.net/10895/4115 |
|
| Acceso abierto |
| Sumario: | ABSTRACT. Claiming to support the first part of the second article 268 of the C.G.P. subsection, the Supreme Court declares inadmissible the appeal from an interlocutory judgment of second instance, which revoked the first instance resolution that formally declares inadmissible the appeal of the final sentence of first instance (and, thus leading crosses the appeal). The Supreme Court understands that this interlocutory judgment of second instance confirms the definitive judgment of first instance. This position of the Supreme Court of Justice - which is discussed in the article taking the process identified as sui 2-5136/2009-data lacks legal basis and deprives the parties, in contradiction with the provisions of the code, the review in cassation of the interlocutory decisions of second instance which, revoking the decisions of first instance franking a remedy of appeal declare inadmissible — for formal reasons — the resources of appeal of the final judgments of first instance. |
|---|
