Some conceptions about distributive justice and its problems in relation to the enjoyment of the right to education
Algunas concepciones sobre la justicia distributiva y sus problemas en relación al disfrute del derecho a la educación
Algumas concepções sobre a justiça distributiva e seus problemas em relação ao gozo do direito à educação
2018 | |
education justice distibutive justice right to education educación justicia justicia distributiva derecho a la educación |
|
Español | |
Universidad Católica del Uruguay | |
LIBERI | |
https://revistas.ucu.edu.uy/index.php/revistadederecho/article/view/1528
https://hdl.handle.net/10895/4160 |
|
Acceso abierto |
_version_ | 1815178716544761856 |
---|---|
author | Henríquez Ramírez, Alfonso |
author_facet | Henríquez Ramírez, Alfonso |
author_role | author |
collection | LIBERI |
dc.creator.none.fl_str_mv | Henríquez Ramírez, Alfonso |
dc.date.accessioned.none.fl_str_mv | 2023-09-13T13:12:15Z |
dc.date.available.none.fl_str_mv | 2023-09-13T13:12:15Z |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv | 2018-04-26 |
dc.description.en-US.fl_txt_mv | In terms of distributive justice, one of the most important problems is that which relates to the question about which is the fairest distribution criterion. In this sense, three alternatives have been proposed: sufficiency, priority and egalitarianism. For sufficiency, justice lies in providing a sufficient or adequate level of wellbeing for all. In turn, for prioritarism, the State must prioritize only those who are worse off. Finally, for egalitarianism, justice consists in distributing the same or equal portion to everyone. In this paper, we are going to propose that this last criterion constitutes the most appropriate distribution standard, treating the right to education. |
dc.description.es-ES.fl_txt_mv | En materia de justicia distributiva, uno de los problemas más importantes, es el que dice relación con la pregunta acerca de cuál es el criterio más justo de distribución. En este sentido, se han planteado tres alternativas: el suficientismo, el prioritarismo y el igualitarismo. Para el suficientismo, la justicia radica en proveer un nivel suficiente o adecuado de bienestar para todos. A su vez, para el prioritarismo, el Estado debe priorizar únicamente a los peor situados. Por último, para el igualitarismo, la justicia consiste en repartir una misma o equitativa porción a todos. En este trabajo, nosotros vamos a proponer que este último criterio, constituye el estándar de distribución más adecuado, tratándose el derecho a la educación. |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv | application/pdf |
dc.identifier.none.fl_str_mv | https://revistas.ucu.edu.uy/index.php/revistadederecho/article/view/1528 10.22235/rd.v0i17.1528 |
dc.identifier.uri.none.fl_str_mv | https://hdl.handle.net/10895/4160 |
dc.language.iso.none.fl_str_mv | spa |
dc.publisher.es-ES.fl_str_mv | Universidad Católica del Uruguay |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv | https://revistas.ucu.edu.uy/index.php/revistadederecho/article/view/1528/1595 |
dc.rights.es-ES.fl_str_mv | Derechos de autor 2018 Revista de Derecho |
dc.rights.none.fl_str_mv | info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
dc.source.en-US.fl_str_mv | Revista de Derecho; No. 17 (2018): Revista de Derecho; 49-63 |
dc.source.es-ES.fl_str_mv | Revista de Derecho; Núm. 17 (2018): Revista de Derecho; 49-63 |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv | 2393-6193 1510-3714 10.22235/rd.v0i17 reponame:LIBERI instname:Universidad Católica del Uruguay instacron:Universidad Católica del Uruguay |
dc.source.pt-PT.fl_str_mv | Revista de Derecho; N.º 17 (2018): Revista de Derecho; 49-63 |
dc.subject.en-US.fl_str_mv | education justice distibutive justice right to education |
dc.subject.es-ES.fl_str_mv | educación justicia justicia distributiva derecho a la educación |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv | Some conceptions about distributive justice and its problems in relation to the enjoyment of the right to education Algunas concepciones sobre la justicia distributiva y sus problemas en relación al disfrute del derecho a la educación Algumas concepções sobre a justiça distributiva e seus problemas em relação ao gozo do direito à educação |
dc.type.en-US.fl_str_mv | Papers evaluated by peers |
dc.type.es-ES.fl_str_mv | Artículos evaluados por pares |
dc.type.none.fl_str_mv | info:eu-repo/semantics/article info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion |
dc.type.pt-PT.fl_str_mv | Avaliados por pares |
dc.type.version.none.fl_str_mv | info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion |
description | In terms of distributive justice, one of the most important problems is that which relates to the question about which is the fairest distribution criterion. In this sense, three alternatives have been proposed: sufficiency, priority and egalitarianism. For sufficiency, justice lies in providing a sufficient or adequate level of wellbeing for all. In turn, for prioritarism, the State must prioritize only those who are worse off. Finally, for egalitarianism, justice consists in distributing the same or equal portion to everyone. In this paper, we are going to propose that this last criterion constitutes the most appropriate distribution standard, treating the right to education. |
eu_rights_str_mv | openAccess |
format | article |
id | LIBERI_8d2d0bfa593f3aa99e56a2238cb4d05d |
identifier_str_mv | 10.22235/rd.v0i17.1528 |
instacron_str | Universidad Católica del Uruguay |
institution | Universidad Católica del Uruguay |
instname_str | Universidad Católica del Uruguay |
language | spa |
network_acronym_str | LIBERI |
network_name_str | LIBERI |
oai_identifier_str | oai:liberi.ucu.edu.uy:10895/4160 |
publishDate | 2018 |
reponame_str | LIBERI |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv | franco.pertusso@ucu.edu.uy |
repository.name.fl_str_mv | LIBERI - Universidad Católica del Uruguay |
repository_id_str | 10342 |
rights_invalid_str_mv | Derechos de autor 2018 Revista de Derecho |
spelling | Henríquez Ramírez, Alfonso2018-04-262023-09-13T13:12:15Z2023-09-13T13:12:15Zhttps://revistas.ucu.edu.uy/index.php/revistadederecho/article/view/152810.22235/rd.v0i17.1528https://hdl.handle.net/10895/4160In terms of distributive justice, one of the most important problems is that which relates to the question about which is the fairest distribution criterion. In this sense, three alternatives have been proposed: sufficiency, priority and egalitarianism. For sufficiency, justice lies in providing a sufficient or adequate level of wellbeing for all. In turn, for prioritarism, the State must prioritize only those who are worse off. Finally, for egalitarianism, justice consists in distributing the same or equal portion to everyone. In this paper, we are going to propose that this last criterion constitutes the most appropriate distribution standard, treating the right to education.En materia de justicia distributiva, uno de los problemas más importantes, es el que dice relación con la pregunta acerca de cuál es el criterio más justo de distribución. En este sentido, se han planteado tres alternativas: el suficientismo, el prioritarismo y el igualitarismo. Para el suficientismo, la justicia radica en proveer un nivel suficiente o adecuado de bienestar para todos. A su vez, para el prioritarismo, el Estado debe priorizar únicamente a los peor situados. Por último, para el igualitarismo, la justicia consiste en repartir una misma o equitativa porción a todos. En este trabajo, nosotros vamos a proponer que este último criterio, constituye el estándar de distribución más adecuado, tratándose el derecho a la educación.application/pdfspaUniversidad Católica del Uruguayhttps://revistas.ucu.edu.uy/index.php/revistadederecho/article/view/1528/1595Derechos de autor 2018 Revista de Derechoinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessRevista de Derecho; No. 17 (2018): Revista de Derecho; 49-63Revista de Derecho; Núm. 17 (2018): Revista de Derecho; 49-63Revista de Derecho; N.º 17 (2018): Revista de Derecho; 49-632393-61931510-371410.22235/rd.v0i17reponame:LIBERIinstname:Universidad Católica del Uruguayinstacron:Universidad Católica del Uruguayeducationjusticedistibutive justiceright to educationeducaciónjusticiajusticia distributivaderecho a la educaciónSome conceptions about distributive justice and its problems in relation to the enjoyment of the right to educationAlgunas concepciones sobre la justicia distributiva y sus problemas en relación al disfrute del derecho a la educaciónAlgumas concepções sobre a justiça distributiva e seus problemas em relação ao gozo do direito à educaçãoinfo:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionPapers evaluated by peersArtículos evaluados por paresAvaliados por paresinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion10895/41602023-09-13 10:12:15.51oai:liberi.ucu.edu.uy:10895/4160Universidadhttps://www.ucu.edu.uy/https://liberi.ucu.edu.uy/oai/requestfranco.pertusso@ucu.edu.uyUruguayopendoar:103422023-09-13T13:12:15LIBERI - Universidad Católica del Uruguayfalse |
spellingShingle | Some conceptions about distributive justice and its problems in relation to the enjoyment of the right to education Henríquez Ramírez, Alfonso education justice distibutive justice right to education educación justicia justicia distributiva derecho a la educación |
status_str | publishedVersion |
title | Some conceptions about distributive justice and its problems in relation to the enjoyment of the right to education |
title_full | Some conceptions about distributive justice and its problems in relation to the enjoyment of the right to education |
title_fullStr | Some conceptions about distributive justice and its problems in relation to the enjoyment of the right to education |
title_full_unstemmed | Some conceptions about distributive justice and its problems in relation to the enjoyment of the right to education |
title_short | Some conceptions about distributive justice and its problems in relation to the enjoyment of the right to education |
title_sort | Some conceptions about distributive justice and its problems in relation to the enjoyment of the right to education |
topic | education justice distibutive justice right to education educación justicia justicia distributiva derecho a la educación |
url | https://revistas.ucu.edu.uy/index.php/revistadederecho/article/view/1528 https://hdl.handle.net/10895/4160 |