The challenges of the judgment dela American Court in the case Almonacid Arellano.
Los desafíos de la sentencia de la Corte Interamericana en el caso Almonacid Arellano.
| 2016 | |
|
derechos humanos corte interamericana de derechos humanos Chile human rights inter-american court of human rights Chile |
|
| Español | |
| Universidad Católica del Uruguay | |
| LIBERI | |
|
https://revistas.ucu.edu.uy/index.php/revistadederecho/article/view/849
https://hdl.handle.net/10895/4098 |
|
| Acceso abierto |
| _version_ | 1815178683574386688 |
|---|---|
| author | Nogueira Alcalá, Humberto |
| author_facet | Nogueira Alcalá, Humberto |
| author_role | author |
| collection | LIBERI |
| dc.creator.none.fl_str_mv | Nogueira Alcalá, Humberto |
| dc.date.accessioned.none.fl_str_mv | 2023-09-13T13:11:19Z |
| dc.date.available.none.fl_str_mv | 2023-09-13T13:11:19Z |
| dc.date.none.fl_str_mv | 2016-01-31 |
| dc.description.en-US.fl_txt_mv | Abstract. The article analyzes the judgment of the Inter-American Court of Human Rightson the case “Almonacid Arellano”, where it was decided that (a) although the Chileandeclaration acknowledging the competence of the Inter-American Court by “operation of law” referred to facts subsequent to the date the ratification instrument was submitted, the unilateral act of any state is conditioned by the Convention itself as a whole and cannot be subject to objections; and (b) Chile infringed the general duties pursuant to articles 1.1 and 2 of the American Convention on Human Rights (the duty to respect the rights and the duty to adopt decisions of domestic law). Upon the analysis of both aspects mentioned, the legitimacy of Decree Law 2191 is studied in respect of its maintenance as well as its adoption, laying special emphasis on all relevant aspects of the matter. The article ends with a reflection on the legal nature of human rights’ international regulations in Chile and the annulment of the Amnesty Decree Law, concluding that any court which deems that the law does not adjust to the constitutional block of human rights, may and must request the Constitutional Court to pronounce on the inapplicability of the legal precept. |
| dc.description.es-ES.fl_txt_mv | Resumen. Se analiza la sentencia de la Corte Interamericana de Derechos Humanos en elcaso Almonacid Arellano, en el cual se decidió que: a) pese a que la declaración chilena dereconocimiento de “pleno derecho” de la competencia de la Corte Interamericana referíaa hechos posteriores a la fecha del depósito del instrumento de ratificación, el acto unilateralde cada Estado está condicionado por la propia Convención como un todo y no puedeser objeto de reservas, y b) que Chile incumplió los deberes generales contenidos en losartículos 1.1 y 2 de la Convención Americana de Derechos Humanos (obligación derespetar los derechos y obligación de adoptar decisiones de derecho interno). Luego deanalizar los dos aspectos señalados se estudia la legitimidad del decreto ley 2191, tantopor su mantenimiento como por su aplicación, con detenimiento en todos los aspectosrelevantes de la cuestión. El artículo culmina con una reflexión sobre la naturaleza jurídicade las normas internacionales de derechos humanos en Chile y la nulidad del Decreto Leyde Amnistía, y concluye que cualquier tribunal que considere que la ley no se ajusta albloque constitucional de los derechos humanos puede y debe pedir al Tribunal Constitucionalque se pronuncie sobre la inaplicabilidad del precepto legal. |
| dc.format.none.fl_str_mv | application/pdf |
| dc.identifier.none.fl_str_mv | https://revistas.ucu.edu.uy/index.php/revistadederecho/article/view/849 10.22235/rd.v0i2.849 |
| dc.identifier.uri.none.fl_str_mv | https://hdl.handle.net/10895/4098 |
| dc.language.iso.none.fl_str_mv | spa |
| dc.publisher.es-ES.fl_str_mv | Universidad Católica del Uruguay |
| dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv | https://revistas.ucu.edu.uy/index.php/revistadederecho/article/view/849/852 |
| dc.rights.es-ES.fl_str_mv | Derechos de autor 2016 Revista de Derecho |
| dc.rights.none.fl_str_mv | info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
| dc.source.en-US.fl_str_mv | Revista de Derecho; No. 2 (2007): Revista de Derecho; 153-179 |
| dc.source.es-ES.fl_str_mv | Revista de Derecho; Núm. 2 (2007): Revista de Derecho; 153-179 |
| dc.source.none.fl_str_mv | 2393-6193 1510-3714 10.22235/rd.v0i2 reponame:LIBERI instname:Universidad Católica del Uruguay instacron:Universidad Católica del Uruguay |
| dc.source.pt-PT.fl_str_mv | Revista de Derecho; N.º 2 (2007): Revista de Derecho; 153-179 |
| dc.subject.en-US.fl_str_mv | human rights inter-american court of human rights Chile |
| dc.subject.es-ES.fl_str_mv | derechos humanos corte interamericana de derechos humanos Chile |
| dc.title.none.fl_str_mv | The challenges of the judgment dela American Court in the case Almonacid Arellano. Los desafíos de la sentencia de la Corte Interamericana en el caso Almonacid Arellano. |
| dc.type.en-US.fl_str_mv | Papers evaluated by peers |
| dc.type.es-ES.fl_str_mv | Artículos evaluados por pares |
| dc.type.none.fl_str_mv | info:eu-repo/semantics/article info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion |
| dc.type.pt-PT.fl_str_mv | Avaliados por pares |
| dc.type.version.none.fl_str_mv | info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion |
| description | Abstract. The article analyzes the judgment of the Inter-American Court of Human Rightson the case “Almonacid Arellano”, where it was decided that (a) although the Chileandeclaration acknowledging the competence of the Inter-American Court by “operation of law” referred to facts subsequent to the date the ratification instrument was submitted, the unilateral act of any state is conditioned by the Convention itself as a whole and cannot be subject to objections; and (b) Chile infringed the general duties pursuant to articles 1.1 and 2 of the American Convention on Human Rights (the duty to respect the rights and the duty to adopt decisions of domestic law). Upon the analysis of both aspects mentioned, the legitimacy of Decree Law 2191 is studied in respect of its maintenance as well as its adoption, laying special emphasis on all relevant aspects of the matter. The article ends with a reflection on the legal nature of human rights’ international regulations in Chile and the annulment of the Amnesty Decree Law, concluding that any court which deems that the law does not adjust to the constitutional block of human rights, may and must request the Constitutional Court to pronounce on the inapplicability of the legal precept. |
| eu_rights_str_mv | openAccess |
| format | article |
| id | LIBERI_6ecb27ad081751ba16c652ea10d3c4fc |
| identifier_str_mv | 10.22235/rd.v0i2.849 |
| instacron_str | Universidad Católica del Uruguay |
| institution | Universidad Católica del Uruguay |
| instname_str | Universidad Católica del Uruguay |
| language | spa |
| network_acronym_str | LIBERI |
| network_name_str | LIBERI |
| oai_identifier_str | oai:liberi.ucu.edu.uy:10895/4098 |
| publishDate | 2016 |
| reponame_str | LIBERI |
| repository.mail.fl_str_mv | franco.pertusso@ucu.edu.uy |
| repository.name.fl_str_mv | LIBERI - Universidad Católica del Uruguay |
| repository_id_str | 10342 |
| rights_invalid_str_mv | Derechos de autor 2016 Revista de Derecho |
| spelling | Nogueira Alcalá, Humberto2016-01-312023-09-13T13:11:19Z2023-09-13T13:11:19Zhttps://revistas.ucu.edu.uy/index.php/revistadederecho/article/view/84910.22235/rd.v0i2.849https://hdl.handle.net/10895/4098Abstract. The article analyzes the judgment of the Inter-American Court of Human Rightson the case “Almonacid Arellano”, where it was decided that (a) although the Chileandeclaration acknowledging the competence of the Inter-American Court by “operation of law” referred to facts subsequent to the date the ratification instrument was submitted, the unilateral act of any state is conditioned by the Convention itself as a whole and cannot be subject to objections; and (b) Chile infringed the general duties pursuant to articles 1.1 and 2 of the American Convention on Human Rights (the duty to respect the rights and the duty to adopt decisions of domestic law). Upon the analysis of both aspects mentioned, the legitimacy of Decree Law 2191 is studied in respect of its maintenance as well as its adoption, laying special emphasis on all relevant aspects of the matter. The article ends with a reflection on the legal nature of human rights’ international regulations in Chile and the annulment of the Amnesty Decree Law, concluding that any court which deems that the law does not adjust to the constitutional block of human rights, may and must request the Constitutional Court to pronounce on the inapplicability of the legal precept.Resumen. Se analiza la sentencia de la Corte Interamericana de Derechos Humanos en elcaso Almonacid Arellano, en el cual se decidió que: a) pese a que la declaración chilena dereconocimiento de “pleno derecho” de la competencia de la Corte Interamericana referíaa hechos posteriores a la fecha del depósito del instrumento de ratificación, el acto unilateralde cada Estado está condicionado por la propia Convención como un todo y no puedeser objeto de reservas, y b) que Chile incumplió los deberes generales contenidos en losartículos 1.1 y 2 de la Convención Americana de Derechos Humanos (obligación derespetar los derechos y obligación de adoptar decisiones de derecho interno). Luego deanalizar los dos aspectos señalados se estudia la legitimidad del decreto ley 2191, tantopor su mantenimiento como por su aplicación, con detenimiento en todos los aspectosrelevantes de la cuestión. El artículo culmina con una reflexión sobre la naturaleza jurídicade las normas internacionales de derechos humanos en Chile y la nulidad del Decreto Leyde Amnistía, y concluye que cualquier tribunal que considere que la ley no se ajusta albloque constitucional de los derechos humanos puede y debe pedir al Tribunal Constitucionalque se pronuncie sobre la inaplicabilidad del precepto legal.application/pdfspaUniversidad Católica del Uruguayhttps://revistas.ucu.edu.uy/index.php/revistadederecho/article/view/849/852Derechos de autor 2016 Revista de Derechoinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessRevista de Derecho; No. 2 (2007): Revista de Derecho; 153-179Revista de Derecho; Núm. 2 (2007): Revista de Derecho; 153-179Revista de Derecho; N.º 2 (2007): Revista de Derecho; 153-1792393-61931510-371410.22235/rd.v0i2reponame:LIBERIinstname:Universidad Católica del Uruguayinstacron:Universidad Católica del Uruguayderechos humanoscorte interamericana de derechos humanosChilehuman rightsinter-american court of human rightsChileThe challenges of the judgment dela American Court in the case Almonacid Arellano.Los desafíos de la sentencia de la Corte Interamericana en el caso Almonacid Arellano.info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionPapers evaluated by peersArtículos evaluados por paresAvaliados por paresinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion10895/40982023-09-13 10:11:20.019oai:liberi.ucu.edu.uy:10895/4098Universidadhttps://www.ucu.edu.uy/https://liberi.ucu.edu.uy/oai/requestfranco.pertusso@ucu.edu.uyUruguayopendoar:103422023-09-13T13:11:20LIBERI - Universidad Católica del Uruguayfalse |
| spellingShingle | The challenges of the judgment dela American Court in the case Almonacid Arellano. Nogueira Alcalá, Humberto derechos humanos corte interamericana de derechos humanos Chile human rights inter-american court of human rights Chile |
| status_str | publishedVersion |
| title | The challenges of the judgment dela American Court in the case Almonacid Arellano. |
| title_full | The challenges of the judgment dela American Court in the case Almonacid Arellano. |
| title_fullStr | The challenges of the judgment dela American Court in the case Almonacid Arellano. |
| title_full_unstemmed | The challenges of the judgment dela American Court in the case Almonacid Arellano. |
| title_short | The challenges of the judgment dela American Court in the case Almonacid Arellano. |
| title_sort | The challenges of the judgment dela American Court in the case Almonacid Arellano. |
| topic | derechos humanos corte interamericana de derechos humanos Chile human rights inter-american court of human rights Chile |
| url | https://revistas.ucu.edu.uy/index.php/revistadederecho/article/view/849 https://hdl.handle.net/10895/4098 |
