Reliability and validity of the Mental Health Continuum (MHC-SF) in the Ecuadorian contexts
Fiabilidad y validez de la Escala del Contínuum de Salud Mental (MHC–SF) en el contexto ecuatoriano
| 2017 | |
|
wellbeing psychometric properties mental health psychological assessment instrumental development MHC-SF bienestar propiedades psicométricas salud mental evaluación psicológica desarrollo instrumental MHC-SF |
|
| Español | |
| Universidad Católica del Uruguay | |
| LIBERI | |
|
https://revistas.ucu.edu.uy/index.php/cienciaspsicologicas/article/view/1499
https://hdl.handle.net/10895/3006 |
|
| Acceso abierto |
| Sumario: | The present study aims to study the factor structure, reliability and validity of the Mental Health Continuum (MHC-SF) of Keyes (2009) in the Ecuadorian context. The scale was applied to two samples, one of 100 people that worked as a pilot and another of 550 people resident in the city of Cuenca-Ecuador, who also were applied an adaptation of the PERMA Profile of Butler and Kern (2016) to verify the convergent and discriminant validity. It was observed that the application in this population presents adequate levels of adjustment and high internal consistency (α=.91) and an adequate general adjustment of the structure of three factors: psychological well-being, social welfare and emotional well-being proposed by the author whose main fit values are RMSEA= .045, CFI= .996, χ2(52)= 109.048 (p= .000), GFI= .997 y TLI= 0.993. The bifactor model presents good values as well: RMSEA=.042, CFI= .996, χ2(52) = 103.040 (p= .000), GFI= .997, TLI= 0.993. We conclude that the Spanish version of MHC-SF (Keyes, 2009) and the bifactor model are appropriate tools to measure mental health in the Ecuadorian context. |
|---|
