The reform of the legal and procedural regime of amparo in Spain.
La reforma del régimen jurídico-procesal del recurso de amparo en España.
| 2016 | |
| Español | |
| Universidad Católica del Uruguay | |
| LIBERI | |
|
https://revistas.ucu.edu.uy/index.php/revistadederecho/article/view/840
https://hdl.handle.net/10895/4089 |
|
| Acceso abierto |
| _version_ | 1815178718021156864 |
|---|---|
| author | Fernández Segado, Francisco |
| author_facet | Fernández Segado, Francisco |
| author_role | author |
| collection | LIBERI |
| dc.creator.none.fl_str_mv | Fernández Segado, Francisco |
| dc.date.accessioned.none.fl_str_mv | 2023-09-13T13:11:15Z |
| dc.date.available.none.fl_str_mv | 2023-09-13T13:11:15Z |
| dc.date.none.fl_str_mv | 2016-01-31 |
| dc.description.en-US.fl_txt_mv | Abstract. The author analyzes in detail the reasons which lead to the reform of the Organic Law of the Constitutional Court (LOTC), in effect pursuant to organic law nr. 6/2007 of May 24, 2007. Some factual information: significant increase in the number of injunctions altering the functioning of the Court, hyperlitigation and elements whichare not within the scope of the Court, such as the judgment of First Instance renderedby the Supreme Court on January 23, 2004. This paper analyzes the modifications and distinguishes: a) the objectification of the injunction; b) the inversion of the filing proceeding; c) the formalization of the rejection; d) the principle of deconcentration and the authorization obtained by the different divisions to solve injunctions. The reform derives mainly from common problems in terms of injunctions outside Spain. For this reason, the study of the experience said country has had and the legislative reform approved are of great interest outside the specific framework of Spanish law. |
| dc.description.es-ES.fl_txt_mv | Resumen. El autor realiza un pormenorizado análisis de las razones que conducen a la reforma de la ley orgánica del Tribunal Constitucional (LOTC), que se efectiviza por ley orgánica n.º 6/2007, de 24 de mayo de 2007. Parte de las causas de hecho: aumento significativo del número de amparos que trastoca el funcionamiento del Tribunal, hiperlitigiosidad, entre otras, y de elementos ajenos al Tribunal, como la sentencia de la Sala Primera del Tribunal Supremo, de 23 de enero de 2004. Analiza las modificaciones y distingue: 1) la objetivación del recurso de amparo; 2) la inversión del trámite de admisión; 3) la formalización de la inadmisión; 4) el principio de desconcentración y la habilitación a las secciones para la resolución de los recursos de amparo. La reforma deriva, en buena parte, de problemas comunes en materia de recursos de amparo fuera de España; por eso, el estudio de la experiencia de dicho país y la reforma legislativa aprobada resultan de interés fuera del ámbito específico del derecho español. |
| dc.format.none.fl_str_mv | application/pdf |
| dc.identifier.none.fl_str_mv | https://revistas.ucu.edu.uy/index.php/revistadederecho/article/view/840 10.22235/rd.v0i3.840 |
| dc.identifier.uri.none.fl_str_mv | https://hdl.handle.net/10895/4089 |
| dc.language.iso.none.fl_str_mv | spa |
| dc.publisher.es-ES.fl_str_mv | Universidad Católica del Uruguay |
| dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv | https://revistas.ucu.edu.uy/index.php/revistadederecho/article/view/840/843 |
| dc.rights.es-ES.fl_str_mv | Derechos de autor 2016 Revista de Derecho |
| dc.rights.none.fl_str_mv | info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
| dc.source.en-US.fl_str_mv | Revista de Derecho; No. 3 (2008): Revista de Derecho; 85-133 |
| dc.source.es-ES.fl_str_mv | Revista de Derecho; Núm. 3 (2008): Revista de Derecho; 85-133 |
| dc.source.none.fl_str_mv | 2393-6193 1510-3714 10.22235/rd.v0i3 reponame:LIBERI instname:Universidad Católica del Uruguay instacron:Universidad Católica del Uruguay |
| dc.source.pt-PT.fl_str_mv | Revista de Derecho; N.º 3 (2008): Revista de Derecho; 85-133 |
| dc.title.none.fl_str_mv | The reform of the legal and procedural regime of amparo in Spain. La reforma del régimen jurídico-procesal del recurso de amparo en España. |
| dc.type.en-US.fl_str_mv | Papers evaluated by peers |
| dc.type.es-ES.fl_str_mv | Artículos evaluados por pares |
| dc.type.none.fl_str_mv | info:eu-repo/semantics/article info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion |
| dc.type.pt-PT.fl_str_mv | Avaliados por pares |
| dc.type.version.none.fl_str_mv | info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion |
| description | Abstract. The author analyzes in detail the reasons which lead to the reform of the Organic Law of the Constitutional Court (LOTC), in effect pursuant to organic law nr. 6/2007 of May 24, 2007. Some factual information: significant increase in the number of injunctions altering the functioning of the Court, hyperlitigation and elements whichare not within the scope of the Court, such as the judgment of First Instance renderedby the Supreme Court on January 23, 2004. This paper analyzes the modifications and distinguishes: a) the objectification of the injunction; b) the inversion of the filing proceeding; c) the formalization of the rejection; d) the principle of deconcentration and the authorization obtained by the different divisions to solve injunctions. The reform derives mainly from common problems in terms of injunctions outside Spain. For this reason, the study of the experience said country has had and the legislative reform approved are of great interest outside the specific framework of Spanish law. |
| eu_rights_str_mv | openAccess |
| format | article |
| id | LIBERI_51c35462e4b050625110076ad37df021 |
| identifier_str_mv | 10.22235/rd.v0i3.840 |
| instacron_str | Universidad Católica del Uruguay |
| institution | Universidad Católica del Uruguay |
| instname_str | Universidad Católica del Uruguay |
| language | spa |
| network_acronym_str | LIBERI |
| network_name_str | LIBERI |
| oai_identifier_str | oai:liberi.ucu.edu.uy:10895/4089 |
| publishDate | 2016 |
| reponame_str | LIBERI |
| repository.mail.fl_str_mv | franco.pertusso@ucu.edu.uy |
| repository.name.fl_str_mv | LIBERI - Universidad Católica del Uruguay |
| repository_id_str | 10342 |
| rights_invalid_str_mv | Derechos de autor 2016 Revista de Derecho |
| spelling | Fernández Segado, Francisco2016-01-312023-09-13T13:11:15Z2023-09-13T13:11:15Zhttps://revistas.ucu.edu.uy/index.php/revistadederecho/article/view/84010.22235/rd.v0i3.840https://hdl.handle.net/10895/4089Abstract. The author analyzes in detail the reasons which lead to the reform of the Organic Law of the Constitutional Court (LOTC), in effect pursuant to organic law nr. 6/2007 of May 24, 2007. Some factual information: significant increase in the number of injunctions altering the functioning of the Court, hyperlitigation and elements whichare not within the scope of the Court, such as the judgment of First Instance renderedby the Supreme Court on January 23, 2004. This paper analyzes the modifications and distinguishes: a) the objectification of the injunction; b) the inversion of the filing proceeding; c) the formalization of the rejection; d) the principle of deconcentration and the authorization obtained by the different divisions to solve injunctions. The reform derives mainly from common problems in terms of injunctions outside Spain. For this reason, the study of the experience said country has had and the legislative reform approved are of great interest outside the specific framework of Spanish law.Resumen. El autor realiza un pormenorizado análisis de las razones que conducen a la reforma de la ley orgánica del Tribunal Constitucional (LOTC), que se efectiviza por ley orgánica n.º 6/2007, de 24 de mayo de 2007. Parte de las causas de hecho: aumento significativo del número de amparos que trastoca el funcionamiento del Tribunal, hiperlitigiosidad, entre otras, y de elementos ajenos al Tribunal, como la sentencia de la Sala Primera del Tribunal Supremo, de 23 de enero de 2004. Analiza las modificaciones y distingue: 1) la objetivación del recurso de amparo; 2) la inversión del trámite de admisión; 3) la formalización de la inadmisión; 4) el principio de desconcentración y la habilitación a las secciones para la resolución de los recursos de amparo. La reforma deriva, en buena parte, de problemas comunes en materia de recursos de amparo fuera de España; por eso, el estudio de la experiencia de dicho país y la reforma legislativa aprobada resultan de interés fuera del ámbito específico del derecho español.application/pdfspaUniversidad Católica del Uruguayhttps://revistas.ucu.edu.uy/index.php/revistadederecho/article/view/840/843Derechos de autor 2016 Revista de Derechoinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessRevista de Derecho; No. 3 (2008): Revista de Derecho; 85-133Revista de Derecho; Núm. 3 (2008): Revista de Derecho; 85-133Revista de Derecho; N.º 3 (2008): Revista de Derecho; 85-1332393-61931510-371410.22235/rd.v0i3reponame:LIBERIinstname:Universidad Católica del Uruguayinstacron:Universidad Católica del UruguayThe reform of the legal and procedural regime of amparo in Spain.La reforma del régimen jurídico-procesal del recurso de amparo en España.info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionPapers evaluated by peersArtículos evaluados por paresAvaliados por paresinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion10895/40892023-09-13 10:11:15.637oai:liberi.ucu.edu.uy:10895/4089Universidadhttps://www.ucu.edu.uy/https://liberi.ucu.edu.uy/oai/requestfranco.pertusso@ucu.edu.uyUruguayopendoar:103422023-09-13T13:11:15LIBERI - Universidad Católica del Uruguayfalse |
| spellingShingle | The reform of the legal and procedural regime of amparo in Spain. Fernández Segado, Francisco |
| status_str | publishedVersion |
| title | The reform of the legal and procedural regime of amparo in Spain. |
| title_full | The reform of the legal and procedural regime of amparo in Spain. |
| title_fullStr | The reform of the legal and procedural regime of amparo in Spain. |
| title_full_unstemmed | The reform of the legal and procedural regime of amparo in Spain. |
| title_short | The reform of the legal and procedural regime of amparo in Spain. |
| title_sort | The reform of the legal and procedural regime of amparo in Spain. |
| url | https://revistas.ucu.edu.uy/index.php/revistadederecho/article/view/840 https://hdl.handle.net/10895/4089 |
