Access to information, a human right blurred by the State acting on the patronage system and government officials treating public property as if it were their own

El acceso a la información, un derecho que se desdibuja ante un Estado clientelar y patrimonialista

Gramajo, Silvio
Detalles Bibliográficos
2014
Authoritarian legacies
secret
access to information
patronage and clientelism
legados autoritarios
secreto
acceso a la información
patrimonialismo y clientelismo
Español
Universidad Católica del Uruguay
LIBERI
https://revistas.ucu.edu.uy/index.php/revistadixit/article/view/399
https://hdl.handle.net/10895/3436
Acceso abierto
_version_ 1815178702738161664
author Gramajo, Silvio
author_facet Gramajo, Silvio
author_role author
collection LIBERI
dc.creator.none.fl_str_mv Gramajo, Silvio
dc.date.accessioned.none.fl_str_mv 2023-09-12T19:14:11Z
dc.date.available.none.fl_str_mv 2023-09-12T19:14:11Z
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2014-09-30
dc.description.en-US.fl_txt_mv The article describes the challenges faced in the process of approval of the legislation for Access to Public Information, Decree 57-2008, in Guatemala, mainly due to the legacy of authoritative regimes —despite the fact that the country has formally transitioned to democracy. This legacy manifests itself not only in the government institutions but also in numerous amounts of common practices (such as clientelism and patronage) that have created the perfect environment for the State to function in a way that privileges and favors certain sectors or groups. The weight of this legacy and its expressions has not only impacted the design of a piece of legislation, but it has gone so far as to endanger it's implementation and institutionalization. This became evident through an exercise of request to public records that the digital newspaper "Plaza Publica" carried out. After four years since the approval of the legislation, the path to guarantee free access to public information and the promotion of actions that would prevent blatant secrecy and abstruseness, remains a long and rocky one.
dc.description.es-ES.fl_txt_mv El presente artículo expone los problemas que enfrentó la aprobación de la Ley de Acceso a la Información Pública, Decreto 57-2008, en Guatemala, debido a los legados autoritarios que aún perviven a pesar de haber transitado a la democracia. Estos legados se manifiestan no solo en instituciones, sino también en algunas prácticas (clientelismo y patrimonialismo) que han sido el asidero perfecto para que el Estado funcione de tal forma que algunos actores políticos continúen teniendo privilegios y prebendas. Estas herencias y sus expresiones han afectado el diseño de una norma, pero además han tenido tal peso que han llegado a poner en riesgo su implementación e institucionalización. Esto quedó demostrado en un ejercicio de solicitudes de acceso a la información pública que hizo el periódico digital Plaza Pública. Después de cinco años de la entrada en vigencia de la ley, el camino para garantizar el derecho de acceso a la información y promover acciones que representen claras derrotas a la opacidad y el secretismo aún es escabroso. 
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
dc.identifier.none.fl_str_mv https://revistas.ucu.edu.uy/index.php/revistadixit/article/view/399
10.22235/d.v0i21.399
dc.identifier.uri.none.fl_str_mv https://hdl.handle.net/10895/3436
dc.language.iso.none.fl_str_mv spa
dc.publisher.es-ES.fl_str_mv Universidad Católica del Uruguay
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv https://revistas.ucu.edu.uy/index.php/revistadixit/article/view/399/372
dc.rights.es-ES.fl_str_mv Derechos de autor 2014 Dixit
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/deed.es
dc.rights.none.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
dc.source.en-US.fl_str_mv Dixit; No. 21 (2014): Dixit; 36-55
dc.source.es-ES.fl_str_mv Dixit; Núm. 21 (2014): Dixit; 36-55
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv 0797-3691
1688-3497
10.22235/d.v0i21
reponame:LIBERI
instname:Universidad Católica del Uruguay
instacron:Universidad Católica del Uruguay
dc.source.pt-PT.fl_str_mv Dixit; N.º 21 (2014): Dixit; 36-55
dc.subject.en-US.fl_str_mv Authoritarian legacies
secret
access to information
patronage and clientelism
dc.subject.es-ES.fl_str_mv legados autoritarios
secreto
acceso a la información
patrimonialismo y clientelismo
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Access to information, a human right blurred by the State acting on the patronage system and government officials treating public property as if it were their own
El acceso a la información, un derecho que se desdibuja ante un Estado clientelar y patrimonialista
dc.type.none.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
dc.type.version.none.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
description The article describes the challenges faced in the process of approval of the legislation for Access to Public Information, Decree 57-2008, in Guatemala, mainly due to the legacy of authoritative regimes —despite the fact that the country has formally transitioned to democracy. This legacy manifests itself not only in the government institutions but also in numerous amounts of common practices (such as clientelism and patronage) that have created the perfect environment for the State to function in a way that privileges and favors certain sectors or groups. The weight of this legacy and its expressions has not only impacted the design of a piece of legislation, but it has gone so far as to endanger it's implementation and institutionalization. This became evident through an exercise of request to public records that the digital newspaper "Plaza Publica" carried out. After four years since the approval of the legislation, the path to guarantee free access to public information and the promotion of actions that would prevent blatant secrecy and abstruseness, remains a long and rocky one.
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
format article
id LIBERI_480884e5d9bc963bad6d598bff6438f7
identifier_str_mv 10.22235/d.v0i21.399
instacron_str Universidad Católica del Uruguay
institution Universidad Católica del Uruguay
instname_str Universidad Católica del Uruguay
language spa
network_acronym_str LIBERI
network_name_str LIBERI
oai_identifier_str oai:liberi.ucu.edu.uy:10895/3436
publishDate 2014
reponame_str LIBERI
repository.mail.fl_str_mv franco.pertusso@ucu.edu.uy
repository.name.fl_str_mv LIBERI - Universidad Católica del Uruguay
repository_id_str 10342
rights_invalid_str_mv Derechos de autor 2014 Dixit
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/deed.es
spelling Gramajo, Silvio2014-09-302023-09-12T19:14:11Z2023-09-12T19:14:11Zhttps://revistas.ucu.edu.uy/index.php/revistadixit/article/view/39910.22235/d.v0i21.399https://hdl.handle.net/10895/3436The article describes the challenges faced in the process of approval of the legislation for Access to Public Information, Decree 57-2008, in Guatemala, mainly due to the legacy of authoritative regimes —despite the fact that the country has formally transitioned to democracy. This legacy manifests itself not only in the government institutions but also in numerous amounts of common practices (such as clientelism and patronage) that have created the perfect environment for the State to function in a way that privileges and favors certain sectors or groups. The weight of this legacy and its expressions has not only impacted the design of a piece of legislation, but it has gone so far as to endanger it's implementation and institutionalization. This became evident through an exercise of request to public records that the digital newspaper "Plaza Publica" carried out. After four years since the approval of the legislation, the path to guarantee free access to public information and the promotion of actions that would prevent blatant secrecy and abstruseness, remains a long and rocky one.El presente artículo expone los problemas que enfrentó la aprobación de la Ley de Acceso a la Información Pública, Decreto 57-2008, en Guatemala, debido a los legados autoritarios que aún perviven a pesar de haber transitado a la democracia. Estos legados se manifiestan no solo en instituciones, sino también en algunas prácticas (clientelismo y patrimonialismo) que han sido el asidero perfecto para que el Estado funcione de tal forma que algunos actores políticos continúen teniendo privilegios y prebendas. Estas herencias y sus expresiones han afectado el diseño de una norma, pero además han tenido tal peso que han llegado a poner en riesgo su implementación e institucionalización. Esto quedó demostrado en un ejercicio de solicitudes de acceso a la información pública que hizo el periódico digital Plaza Pública. Después de cinco años de la entrada en vigencia de la ley, el camino para garantizar el derecho de acceso a la información y promover acciones que representen claras derrotas a la opacidad y el secretismo aún es escabroso. application/pdfspaUniversidad Católica del Uruguayhttps://revistas.ucu.edu.uy/index.php/revistadixit/article/view/399/372Derechos de autor 2014 Dixithttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/deed.esinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessDixit; No. 21 (2014): Dixit; 36-55Dixit; Núm. 21 (2014): Dixit; 36-55Dixit; N.º 21 (2014): Dixit; 36-550797-36911688-349710.22235/d.v0i21reponame:LIBERIinstname:Universidad Católica del Uruguayinstacron:Universidad Católica del UruguayAuthoritarian legaciessecretaccess to informationpatronage and clientelismlegados autoritariossecretoacceso a la informaciónpatrimonialismo y clientelismoAccess to information, a human right blurred by the State acting on the patronage system and government officials treating public property as if it were their ownEl acceso a la información, un derecho que se desdibuja ante un Estado clientelar y patrimonialistainfo:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion10895/34362023-09-12 16:14:11.601oai:liberi.ucu.edu.uy:10895/3436Universidadhttps://www.ucu.edu.uy/https://liberi.ucu.edu.uy/oai/requestfranco.pertusso@ucu.edu.uyUruguayopendoar:103422023-09-12T19:14:11LIBERI - Universidad Católica del Uruguayfalse
spellingShingle Access to information, a human right blurred by the State acting on the patronage system and government officials treating public property as if it were their own
Gramajo, Silvio
Authoritarian legacies
secret
access to information
patronage and clientelism
legados autoritarios
secreto
acceso a la información
patrimonialismo y clientelismo
status_str publishedVersion
title Access to information, a human right blurred by the State acting on the patronage system and government officials treating public property as if it were their own
title_full Access to information, a human right blurred by the State acting on the patronage system and government officials treating public property as if it were their own
title_fullStr Access to information, a human right blurred by the State acting on the patronage system and government officials treating public property as if it were their own
title_full_unstemmed Access to information, a human right blurred by the State acting on the patronage system and government officials treating public property as if it were their own
title_short Access to information, a human right blurred by the State acting on the patronage system and government officials treating public property as if it were their own
title_sort Access to information, a human right blurred by the State acting on the patronage system and government officials treating public property as if it were their own
topic Authoritarian legacies
secret
access to information
patronage and clientelism
legados autoritarios
secreto
acceso a la información
patrimonialismo y clientelismo
url https://revistas.ucu.edu.uy/index.php/revistadixit/article/view/399
https://hdl.handle.net/10895/3436