The statutory element of secrecy as an instrument for effective implementation guarantees.
El elemento estatutario del secreto como instrumento de efectiva realización de las garantías.
| 2016 | |
|
teoría de las esferas secreto bancario relativismo garantías paradigma theory of the spheres banking secrecy relativism guarantees paradigm |
|
| Español | |
| Universidad Católica del Uruguay | |
| LIBERI | |
|
https://revistas.ucu.edu.uy/index.php/revistadederecho/article/view/857
https://hdl.handle.net/10895/4106 |
|
| Acceso abierto |
| _version_ | 1815178683547123712 |
|---|---|
| author | Cervini, Raúl |
| author_facet | Cervini, Raúl |
| author_role | author |
| collection | LIBERI |
| dc.creator.none.fl_str_mv | Cervini, Raúl |
| dc.date.accessioned.none.fl_str_mv | 2023-09-13T13:11:37Z |
| dc.date.available.none.fl_str_mv | 2023-09-13T13:11:37Z |
| dc.date.none.fl_str_mv | 2016-01-31 |
| dc.description.en-US.fl_txt_mv | Abstract. The dogmatic orientation of the secret as an institution is generally fully definedfrom the theory referred to as the theory of the spheres. This modern working paradigmenables us to pinpoint the various manifestations of intimacy/privacy in concentric spheresof progressively larger radius, inversely related to the intensity of their protection: the individual sphere, the private sphere, the trust sphere and, lastly, the secret sphere, consubstantially related to what freedom essentially is. This essential view of the secretmust be expressed through its dogmatic concept, and due to natural derivation, through the variety of its structural elements; classically: relative subjectivism, current situation, legal relevance and relativism. A fifth element is put forward, the statutory one, which turns this institution into a right-obligation system with certain guarantees. The Uruguayan banking secrecy is analyzed so as to prove the usefulness of said proposal, enabling us to visualize the relevance of the legislation and the limits of the active legitimization of the debtor whose secrecy is kept, as well as the procedural means to make it effective. |
| dc.description.es-ES.fl_txt_mv | Resumen. La dirección dogmática del instituto del secreto en general se define en plenituda partir de la llamada teoría de las esferas. Este moderno paradigma de trabajo permiteubicar tomográficamente las distintas manifestaciones de la intimidad/privacidad en esferasconcéntricas de radio progresivamente mayor, en relación inversa a la intensidad de suprotección: la esfera de lo individual, la esfera privada, la esfera de confianza y por últimola del secreto, que se consustancia con lo medular de la libertad. Esta visión medular delsecreto debe traducirse en su concepto dogmático y por natural derivación en el elenco desus elementos estructurales; clásicamente: subjetivismo relativizado, actualidad, relevanciajurídica y relativismo. Se propone un quinto elemento, el estatutario, que transforma alinstituto en un sistema de derecho-deber en clave de garantías. A efectos de demostrar lautilidad de tal propuesta se recurre al análisis del secreto bancario uruguayo, que permitevisualizar la pertinencia normativa y los límites de la legitimación activa del deudor delsecreto, así como los medios procesales para hacerla efectiva. |
| dc.format.none.fl_str_mv | application/pdf |
| dc.identifier.none.fl_str_mv | https://revistas.ucu.edu.uy/index.php/revistadederecho/article/view/857 10.22235/rd.v0i1.857 |
| dc.identifier.uri.none.fl_str_mv | https://hdl.handle.net/10895/4106 |
| dc.language.iso.none.fl_str_mv | spa |
| dc.publisher.es-ES.fl_str_mv | Universidad Católica del Uruguay |
| dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv | https://revistas.ucu.edu.uy/index.php/revistadederecho/article/view/857/860 |
| dc.rights.es-ES.fl_str_mv | Derechos de autor 2016 Revista de Derecho |
| dc.rights.none.fl_str_mv | info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
| dc.source.en-US.fl_str_mv | Revista de Derecho; No. 1 (2006): Revista de Derecho; 55-81 |
| dc.source.es-ES.fl_str_mv | Revista de Derecho; Núm. 1 (2006): Revista de Derecho; 55-81 |
| dc.source.none.fl_str_mv | 2393-6193 1510-3714 10.22235/rd.v0i1 reponame:LIBERI instname:Universidad Católica del Uruguay instacron:Universidad Católica del Uruguay |
| dc.source.pt-PT.fl_str_mv | Revista de Derecho; N.º 1 (2006): Revista de Derecho; 55-81 |
| dc.subject.en-US.fl_str_mv | theory of the spheres banking secrecy relativism guarantees paradigm |
| dc.subject.es-ES.fl_str_mv | teoría de las esferas secreto bancario relativismo garantías paradigma |
| dc.title.none.fl_str_mv | The statutory element of secrecy as an instrument for effective implementation guarantees. El elemento estatutario del secreto como instrumento de efectiva realización de las garantías. |
| dc.type.en-US.fl_str_mv | Papers evaluated by peers |
| dc.type.es-ES.fl_str_mv | Artículos evaluados por pares |
| dc.type.none.fl_str_mv | info:eu-repo/semantics/article info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion |
| dc.type.pt-PT.fl_str_mv | Avaliados por pares |
| dc.type.version.none.fl_str_mv | info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion |
| description | Abstract. The dogmatic orientation of the secret as an institution is generally fully definedfrom the theory referred to as the theory of the spheres. This modern working paradigmenables us to pinpoint the various manifestations of intimacy/privacy in concentric spheresof progressively larger radius, inversely related to the intensity of their protection: the individual sphere, the private sphere, the trust sphere and, lastly, the secret sphere, consubstantially related to what freedom essentially is. This essential view of the secretmust be expressed through its dogmatic concept, and due to natural derivation, through the variety of its structural elements; classically: relative subjectivism, current situation, legal relevance and relativism. A fifth element is put forward, the statutory one, which turns this institution into a right-obligation system with certain guarantees. The Uruguayan banking secrecy is analyzed so as to prove the usefulness of said proposal, enabling us to visualize the relevance of the legislation and the limits of the active legitimization of the debtor whose secrecy is kept, as well as the procedural means to make it effective. |
| eu_rights_str_mv | openAccess |
| format | article |
| id | LIBERI_00e4ea32ae5d5165ff54e65fdb808ef1 |
| identifier_str_mv | 10.22235/rd.v0i1.857 |
| instacron_str | Universidad Católica del Uruguay |
| institution | Universidad Católica del Uruguay |
| instname_str | Universidad Católica del Uruguay |
| language | spa |
| network_acronym_str | LIBERI |
| network_name_str | LIBERI |
| oai_identifier_str | oai:liberi.ucu.edu.uy:10895/4106 |
| publishDate | 2016 |
| reponame_str | LIBERI |
| repository.mail.fl_str_mv | franco.pertusso@ucu.edu.uy |
| repository.name.fl_str_mv | LIBERI - Universidad Católica del Uruguay |
| repository_id_str | 10342 |
| rights_invalid_str_mv | Derechos de autor 2016 Revista de Derecho |
| spelling | Cervini, Raúl2016-01-312023-09-13T13:11:37Z2023-09-13T13:11:37Zhttps://revistas.ucu.edu.uy/index.php/revistadederecho/article/view/85710.22235/rd.v0i1.857https://hdl.handle.net/10895/4106Abstract. The dogmatic orientation of the secret as an institution is generally fully definedfrom the theory referred to as the theory of the spheres. This modern working paradigmenables us to pinpoint the various manifestations of intimacy/privacy in concentric spheresof progressively larger radius, inversely related to the intensity of their protection: the individual sphere, the private sphere, the trust sphere and, lastly, the secret sphere, consubstantially related to what freedom essentially is. This essential view of the secretmust be expressed through its dogmatic concept, and due to natural derivation, through the variety of its structural elements; classically: relative subjectivism, current situation, legal relevance and relativism. A fifth element is put forward, the statutory one, which turns this institution into a right-obligation system with certain guarantees. The Uruguayan banking secrecy is analyzed so as to prove the usefulness of said proposal, enabling us to visualize the relevance of the legislation and the limits of the active legitimization of the debtor whose secrecy is kept, as well as the procedural means to make it effective.Resumen. La dirección dogmática del instituto del secreto en general se define en plenituda partir de la llamada teoría de las esferas. Este moderno paradigma de trabajo permiteubicar tomográficamente las distintas manifestaciones de la intimidad/privacidad en esferasconcéntricas de radio progresivamente mayor, en relación inversa a la intensidad de suprotección: la esfera de lo individual, la esfera privada, la esfera de confianza y por últimola del secreto, que se consustancia con lo medular de la libertad. Esta visión medular delsecreto debe traducirse en su concepto dogmático y por natural derivación en el elenco desus elementos estructurales; clásicamente: subjetivismo relativizado, actualidad, relevanciajurídica y relativismo. Se propone un quinto elemento, el estatutario, que transforma alinstituto en un sistema de derecho-deber en clave de garantías. A efectos de demostrar lautilidad de tal propuesta se recurre al análisis del secreto bancario uruguayo, que permitevisualizar la pertinencia normativa y los límites de la legitimación activa del deudor delsecreto, así como los medios procesales para hacerla efectiva.application/pdfspaUniversidad Católica del Uruguayhttps://revistas.ucu.edu.uy/index.php/revistadederecho/article/view/857/860Derechos de autor 2016 Revista de Derechoinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessRevista de Derecho; No. 1 (2006): Revista de Derecho; 55-81Revista de Derecho; Núm. 1 (2006): Revista de Derecho; 55-81Revista de Derecho; N.º 1 (2006): Revista de Derecho; 55-812393-61931510-371410.22235/rd.v0i1reponame:LIBERIinstname:Universidad Católica del Uruguayinstacron:Universidad Católica del Uruguayteoría de las esferassecreto bancariorelativismogarantíasparadigmatheory of the spheresbanking secrecyrelativismguaranteesparadigmThe statutory element of secrecy as an instrument for effective implementation guarantees.El elemento estatutario del secreto como instrumento de efectiva realización de las garantías.info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionPapers evaluated by peersArtículos evaluados por paresAvaliados por paresinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion10895/41062023-09-13 10:11:37.299oai:liberi.ucu.edu.uy:10895/4106Universidadhttps://www.ucu.edu.uy/https://liberi.ucu.edu.uy/oai/requestfranco.pertusso@ucu.edu.uyUruguayopendoar:103422023-09-13T13:11:37LIBERI - Universidad Católica del Uruguayfalse |
| spellingShingle | The statutory element of secrecy as an instrument for effective implementation guarantees. Cervini, Raúl teoría de las esferas secreto bancario relativismo garantías paradigma theory of the spheres banking secrecy relativism guarantees paradigm |
| status_str | publishedVersion |
| title | The statutory element of secrecy as an instrument for effective implementation guarantees. |
| title_full | The statutory element of secrecy as an instrument for effective implementation guarantees. |
| title_fullStr | The statutory element of secrecy as an instrument for effective implementation guarantees. |
| title_full_unstemmed | The statutory element of secrecy as an instrument for effective implementation guarantees. |
| title_short | The statutory element of secrecy as an instrument for effective implementation guarantees. |
| title_sort | The statutory element of secrecy as an instrument for effective implementation guarantees. |
| topic | teoría de las esferas secreto bancario relativismo garantías paradigma theory of the spheres banking secrecy relativism guarantees paradigm |
| url | https://revistas.ucu.edu.uy/index.php/revistadederecho/article/view/857 https://hdl.handle.net/10895/4106 |
