Report Suramet Suplementary Comparison (SIM 7.17)

SANTO, CLAUDIA - GARCIA, FRANCISCO - LOAYZA, VICTOR - SERRA, RODOLFO - HABOUR, ZEINA

Resumen:

It has been agreed between National Laboratories of countries of Suramet (CESMEC- Chile, INTI-Argentina, INMETRO-Brasil, LATU-Uruguay) to perfom a Suplementary comparison in 2000. NIST agreed to participate as an invited laboratory. LATU accepted the role as pilot laboratory. The weights used for the comparison were chosen among those available for comparison in LATU and INTI, that could cover the range of weights mostly used in labs involved. They were of four nominal values: 1 g, 10 g, 100 g and 1000 g. The calibrations were carried out from 02/2001 to 09/2002. All laboratories have reported their values to pilot lab by 12/2002. Data of volume of weights and their uncertainty were available to all participants in the “Measurement Protocol”, and were not measured by the participants. Magnetic susceptibility of weights were in accordance to E2 class. The stability of the standards was checked over a period of one year . The reference value was taken as the weighed mean of all labs. Consistency check was performed, assumed normal distribution. In the cases that a signifficant variation was detected, the reference value was corrected taking into account the estimated drift. Normalized errors were calculated for all participants taking into account E1 and E2 uncertainties according to OIML R 111-04. The results are O.K for 1000 g , 100 g and 10 g weights considering E1 uncertainties and for 1 g weight considering E2 uncertainty. Equivalence between laboratories was evaluated. Bilateral coefficients (bilateral normalizad errors) was estimated taking into account the maximum between declared uncertainty and E1 uncertainties for 1000 g and 100 g weights and E2 uncertainties for 10 g and 1 g weights. There is a good equivalence between participants of comparison.


Detalles Bibliográficos
2007
CALIBRACIÓN
LABORATORIOS
METROLOGÍA
Inglés
Laboratorio Tecnológico del Uruguay
Catálogo digital del LATU
https://catalogo.latu.org.uy/opac_css/index.php?lvl=notice_display&id=28941
Acceso abierto
CC BY-NC-ND
_version_ 1807353827930669056
author SANTO, CLAUDIA
author2 GARCIA, FRANCISCO
LOAYZA, VICTOR
SERRA, RODOLFO
HABOUR, ZEINA
author2_role author
author
author
author
author_facet SANTO, CLAUDIA
GARCIA, FRANCISCO
LOAYZA, VICTOR
SERRA, RODOLFO
HABOUR, ZEINA
author_role author
collection Catálogo digital del LATU
dc.coverage.none.fl_str_mv Presentado en: NCSL International Workshop & Symposium Metrology's Impact on Products and Services (2007 julio 29 - agosto 2 : Saint Paul)
dc.creator.none.fl_str_mv SANTO, CLAUDIA
GARCIA, FRANCISCO
LOAYZA, VICTOR
SERRA, RODOLFO
HABOUR, ZEINA
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2007-01-01
dc.description.abstract.none.fl_txt_mv It has been agreed between National Laboratories of countries of Suramet (CESMEC- Chile, INTI-Argentina, INMETRO-Brasil, LATU-Uruguay) to perfom a Suplementary comparison in 2000. NIST agreed to participate as an invited laboratory. LATU accepted the role as pilot laboratory. The weights used for the comparison were chosen among those available for comparison in LATU and INTI, that could cover the range of weights mostly used in labs involved. They were of four nominal values: 1 g, 10 g, 100 g and 1000 g. The calibrations were carried out from 02/2001 to 09/2002. All laboratories have reported their values to pilot lab by 12/2002. Data of volume of weights and their uncertainty were available to all participants in the “Measurement Protocol”, and were not measured by the participants. Magnetic susceptibility of weights were in accordance to E2 class. The stability of the standards was checked over a period of one year . The reference value was taken as the weighed mean of all labs. Consistency check was performed, assumed normal distribution. In the cases that a signifficant variation was detected, the reference value was corrected taking into account the estimated drift. Normalized errors were calculated for all participants taking into account E1 and E2 uncertainties according to OIML R 111-04. The results are O.K for 1000 g , 100 g and 10 g weights considering E1 uncertainties and for 1 g weight considering E2 uncertainty. Equivalence between laboratories was evaluated. Bilateral coefficients (bilateral normalizad errors) was estimated taking into account the maximum between declared uncertainty and E1 uncertainties for 1000 g and 100 g weights and E2 uncertainties for 10 g and 1 g weights. There is a good equivalence between participants of comparison.
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv Pdf
dc.identifier.none.fl_str_mv https://catalogo.latu.org.uy/opac_css/index.php?lvl=notice_display&id=28941
28941
urn:ISBN:32925
dc.language.iso.none.fl_str_mv eng
dc.rights.license.none.fl_str_mv CC BY-NC-ND
dc.rights.none.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
CC BY-NC-ND
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv reponame:Catálogo digital del LATU
instname:Laboratorio Tecnológico del Uruguay
instacron:Laboratorio Tecnológico del Uruguay
dc.subject.none.fl_str_mv CALIBRACIÓN
LABORATORIOS
METROLOGÍA
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Report Suramet Suplementary Comparison (SIM 7.17)
dc.type.none.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/report
Publicado
dc.type.version.none.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
description It has been agreed between National Laboratories of countries of Suramet (CESMEC- Chile, INTI-Argentina, INMETRO-Brasil, LATU-Uruguay) to perfom a Suplementary comparison in 2000. NIST agreed to participate as an invited laboratory. LATU accepted the role as pilot laboratory. The weights used for the comparison were chosen among those available for comparison in LATU and INTI, that could cover the range of weights mostly used in labs involved. They were of four nominal values: 1 g, 10 g, 100 g and 1000 g. The calibrations were carried out from 02/2001 to 09/2002. All laboratories have reported their values to pilot lab by 12/2002. Data of volume of weights and their uncertainty were available to all participants in the “Measurement Protocol”, and were not measured by the participants. Magnetic susceptibility of weights were in accordance to E2 class. The stability of the standards was checked over a period of one year . The reference value was taken as the weighed mean of all labs. Consistency check was performed, assumed normal distribution. In the cases that a signifficant variation was detected, the reference value was corrected taking into account the estimated drift. Normalized errors were calculated for all participants taking into account E1 and E2 uncertainties according to OIML R 111-04. The results are O.K for 1000 g , 100 g and 10 g weights considering E1 uncertainties and for 1 g weight considering E2 uncertainty. Equivalence between laboratories was evaluated. Bilateral coefficients (bilateral normalizad errors) was estimated taking into account the maximum between declared uncertainty and E1 uncertainties for 1000 g and 100 g weights and E2 uncertainties for 10 g and 1 g weights. There is a good equivalence between participants of comparison.
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
format report
id LATU_0afd04aa8b768a7a2126d47d42346c97
identifier_str_mv 28941
urn:ISBN:32925
instacron_str Laboratorio Tecnológico del Uruguay
institution Laboratorio Tecnológico del Uruguay
instname_str Laboratorio Tecnológico del Uruguay
language eng
network_acronym_str LATU
network_name_str Catálogo digital del LATU
oai_identifier_str oai:PMBOAI:28941
publishDate 2007
reponame_str Catálogo digital del LATU
repository.mail.fl_str_mv lfiori@latu.org.uy
repository.name.fl_str_mv Catálogo digital del LATU - Laboratorio Tecnológico del Uruguay
repository_id_str
rights_invalid_str_mv CC BY-NC-ND
CC BY-NC-ND
spelling Report Suramet Suplementary Comparison (SIM 7.17)SANTO, CLAUDIAGARCIA, FRANCISCOLOAYZA, VICTORSERRA, RODOLFOHABOUR, ZEINACALIBRACIÓNLABORATORIOSMETROLOGÍAIt has been agreed between National Laboratories of countries of Suramet (CESMEC- Chile, INTI-Argentina, INMETRO-Brasil, LATU-Uruguay) to perfom a Suplementary comparison in 2000. NIST agreed to participate as an invited laboratory. LATU accepted the role as pilot laboratory. The weights used for the comparison were chosen among those available for comparison in LATU and INTI, that could cover the range of weights mostly used in labs involved. They were of four nominal values: 1 g, 10 g, 100 g and 1000 g. The calibrations were carried out from 02/2001 to 09/2002. All laboratories have reported their values to pilot lab by 12/2002. Data of volume of weights and their uncertainty were available to all participants in the “Measurement Protocol”, and were not measured by the participants. Magnetic susceptibility of weights were in accordance to E2 class. The stability of the standards was checked over a period of one year . The reference value was taken as the weighed mean of all labs. Consistency check was performed, assumed normal distribution. In the cases that a signifficant variation was detected, the reference value was corrected taking into account the estimated drift. Normalized errors were calculated for all participants taking into account E1 and E2 uncertainties according to OIML R 111-04. The results are O.K for 1000 g , 100 g and 10 g weights considering E1 uncertainties and for 1 g weight considering E2 uncertainty. Equivalence between laboratories was evaluated. Bilateral coefficients (bilateral normalizad errors) was estimated taking into account the maximum between declared uncertainty and E1 uncertainties for 1000 g and 100 g weights and E2 uncertainties for 10 g and 1 g weights. There is a good equivalence between participants of comparison. 2007-01-01info:eu-repo/semantics/reportPublicadoinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionPdfhttps://catalogo.latu.org.uy/opac_css/index.php?lvl=notice_display&id=2894128941urn:ISBN:32925engPresentado en: NCSL International Workshop & Symposium Metrology's Impact on Products and Services (2007 julio 29 - agosto 2 : Saint Paul)info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessCC BY-NC-NDCC BY-NC-NDreponame:Catálogo digital del LATUinstname:Laboratorio Tecnológico del Uruguayinstacron:Laboratorio Tecnológico del Uruguay2020-05-12T17:55:16Zoai:PMBOAI:28941Gobiernohttps://latu.org.uy/https://catalogo.latu.org.uy/ws/PMBOAIlfiori@latu.org.uyUruguayopendoar:2024-08-01T14:48:39.478157Catálogo digital del LATU - Laboratorio Tecnológico del Uruguayfalse
spellingShingle Report Suramet Suplementary Comparison (SIM 7.17)
SANTO, CLAUDIA
CALIBRACIÓN
LABORATORIOS
METROLOGÍA
status_str publishedVersion
title Report Suramet Suplementary Comparison (SIM 7.17)
title_full Report Suramet Suplementary Comparison (SIM 7.17)
title_fullStr Report Suramet Suplementary Comparison (SIM 7.17)
title_full_unstemmed Report Suramet Suplementary Comparison (SIM 7.17)
title_short Report Suramet Suplementary Comparison (SIM 7.17)
title_sort Report Suramet Suplementary Comparison (SIM 7.17)
topic CALIBRACIÓN
LABORATORIOS
METROLOGÍA
url https://catalogo.latu.org.uy/opac_css/index.php?lvl=notice_display&id=28941