Financial performance and opportunistic commercialization of beef production systems in southern Brazil.

SESSIM, A. G. - CANOZZI, M.E.A. - PEREIRA, G. R. - CASTILHO, E. M. - BARCELLOS, J. O. J.

Resumen:

ABSTRACT.- This study compares the technical and financial performance of different beef cattle production systems and assesses the opportunistic commercialization practiced in these systems. It was evaluated data from four production units located in southern Brazil: cow-calf in native pastures (CCNP; 1,155 ha; 1,529 animals); cow-calf with agriculture (CCA; 1,008 ha; 1,313 animals); rearing-fattening (RFU; 360 ha; 435 animals); and fattening (FU; 205 ha; 168 animals) as well as an integrated system simulating the physical and economic parameters of the four units (IAS; 2,728 ha; 3,445 animals). The four independent units were considered as opportunistic commercialization and IAS as non-opportunistic. The highest yield was obtained for RFU (297 kg/ha), followed by IAS (114 kg/ha), FU (98 kg/ha), CCNP (87 kg/ha), and CCA (83 kg/ha). The CCNP was the most economically efficient, considering the gross margin per kilogram (GM/kg) (US$ 0.93). The GM/kg value of IAS (US$ 0.74) was 37 % higher compared to the sum of the average of the four units (US$ 0.54), and IAS had the lowest total production costs per kg (22.5 %). It was concluded that each independent unit could increase GM/kg (37 %) and GM/ha (3.8 %) and use calves in a rearing-fattening unit for further sale. Hence, the integration of beef production systems increases the gross margin of firms, presenting a profitable business advantage to rural entrepreneurs through non-opportunistic commercialization. © 2022 INIFAP-CENID Parasitologia Veterinaria. All rights reserved.

Detalles Bibliográficos
2022
Animal production
Economy
Gross revenue
Integration
Production cost
PLATAFORMA SALUD ANINMAL
Inglés
Instituto Nacional de Investigación Agropecuaria
AINFO
https://ainfo.inia.uy/consulta/busca?b=pc&id=63153&biblioteca=vazio&busca=63153&qFacets=63153
Acceso abierto
_version_ 1856772334859321344
author SESSIM, A. G.
author2 CANOZZI, M.E.A.
PEREIRA, G. R.
CASTILHO, E. M.
BARCELLOS, J. O. J.
author2_role author
author
author
author
author_facet SESSIM, A. G.
CANOZZI, M.E.A.
PEREIRA, G. R.
CASTILHO, E. M.
BARCELLOS, J. O. J.
author_role author
bitstream.checksum.fl_str_mv 819b605369134759cdab14c384cb9620
bitstream.checksumAlgorithm.fl_str_mv MD5
bitstream.url.fl_str_mv https://redi.anii.org.uy/jspui/bitstream/20.500.12381/4209/1/sword-2025-06-23T15%3a23%3a57.original.xml
collection AINFO
dc.creator.none.fl_str_mv SESSIM, A. G.
CANOZZI, M.E.A.
PEREIRA, G. R.
CASTILHO, E. M.
BARCELLOS, J. O. J.
dc.date.accessioned.none.fl_str_mv 2025-06-23T18:23:57Z
dc.date.available.none.fl_str_mv 2025-06-23T18:23:57Z
dc.date.issued.none.fl_str_mv 2022
dc.date.updated.none.fl_str_mv 2025-06-23T18:23:57Z
dc.description.abstract.none.fl_txt_mv ABSTRACT.- This study compares the technical and financial performance of different beef cattle production systems and assesses the opportunistic commercialization practiced in these systems. It was evaluated data from four production units located in southern Brazil: cow-calf in native pastures (CCNP; 1,155 ha; 1,529 animals); cow-calf with agriculture (CCA; 1,008 ha; 1,313 animals); rearing-fattening (RFU; 360 ha; 435 animals); and fattening (FU; 205 ha; 168 animals) as well as an integrated system simulating the physical and economic parameters of the four units (IAS; 2,728 ha; 3,445 animals). The four independent units were considered as opportunistic commercialization and IAS as non-opportunistic. The highest yield was obtained for RFU (297 kg/ha), followed by IAS (114 kg/ha), FU (98 kg/ha), CCNP (87 kg/ha), and CCA (83 kg/ha). The CCNP was the most economically efficient, considering the gross margin per kilogram (GM/kg) (US$ 0.93). The GM/kg value of IAS (US$ 0.74) was 37 % higher compared to the sum of the average of the four units (US$ 0.54), and IAS had the lowest total production costs per kg (22.5 %). It was concluded that each independent unit could increase GM/kg (37 %) and GM/ha (3.8 %) and use calves in a rearing-fattening unit for further sale. Hence, the integration of beef production systems increases the gross margin of firms, presenting a profitable business advantage to rural entrepreneurs through non-opportunistic commercialization. © 2022 INIFAP-CENID Parasitologia Veterinaria. All rights reserved.
dc.identifier.none.fl_str_mv https://ainfo.inia.uy/consulta/busca?b=pc&id=63153&biblioteca=vazio&busca=63153&qFacets=63153
dc.language.iso.none.fl_str_mv en
eng
dc.rights.es.fl_str_mv Acceso abierto
dc.rights.none.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv reponame:AINFO
instname:Instituto Nacional de Investigación Agropecuaria
instacron:Instituto Nacional de Investigación Agropecuaria
dc.subject.none.fl_str_mv Animal production
Economy
Gross revenue
Integration
Production cost
PLATAFORMA SALUD ANINMAL
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Financial performance and opportunistic commercialization of beef production systems in southern Brazil.
dc.type.none.fl_str_mv Article
PublishedVersion
info:eu-repo/semantics/article
dc.type.version.none.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
description ABSTRACT.- This study compares the technical and financial performance of different beef cattle production systems and assesses the opportunistic commercialization practiced in these systems. It was evaluated data from four production units located in southern Brazil: cow-calf in native pastures (CCNP; 1,155 ha; 1,529 animals); cow-calf with agriculture (CCA; 1,008 ha; 1,313 animals); rearing-fattening (RFU; 360 ha; 435 animals); and fattening (FU; 205 ha; 168 animals) as well as an integrated system simulating the physical and economic parameters of the four units (IAS; 2,728 ha; 3,445 animals). The four independent units were considered as opportunistic commercialization and IAS as non-opportunistic. The highest yield was obtained for RFU (297 kg/ha), followed by IAS (114 kg/ha), FU (98 kg/ha), CCNP (87 kg/ha), and CCA (83 kg/ha). The CCNP was the most economically efficient, considering the gross margin per kilogram (GM/kg) (US$ 0.93). The GM/kg value of IAS (US$ 0.74) was 37 % higher compared to the sum of the average of the four units (US$ 0.54), and IAS had the lowest total production costs per kg (22.5 %). It was concluded that each independent unit could increase GM/kg (37 %) and GM/ha (3.8 %) and use calves in a rearing-fattening unit for further sale. Hence, the integration of beef production systems increases the gross margin of firms, presenting a profitable business advantage to rural entrepreneurs through non-opportunistic commercialization. © 2022 INIFAP-CENID Parasitologia Veterinaria. All rights reserved.
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
format article
id INIAOAI_be21bfdc2915c7acec35e1c390367e3c
instacron_str Instituto Nacional de Investigación Agropecuaria
institution Instituto Nacional de Investigación Agropecuaria
instname_str Instituto Nacional de Investigación Agropecuaria
language eng
language_invalid_str_mv en
network_acronym_str INIAOAI
network_name_str AINFO
oai_identifier_str oai:redi.anii.org.uy:20.500.12381/4209
publishDate 2022
reponame_str AINFO
repository.mail.fl_str_mv lorrego@inia.org.uy
repository.name.fl_str_mv AINFO - Instituto Nacional de Investigación Agropecuaria
repository_id_str
rights_invalid_str_mv Acceso abierto
spelling 2025-06-23T18:23:57Z2025-06-23T18:23:57Z20222025-06-23T18:23:57Zhttps://ainfo.inia.uy/consulta/busca?b=pc&id=63153&biblioteca=vazio&busca=63153&qFacets=63153ABSTRACT.- This study compares the technical and financial performance of different beef cattle production systems and assesses the opportunistic commercialization practiced in these systems. It was evaluated data from four production units located in southern Brazil: cow-calf in native pastures (CCNP; 1,155 ha; 1,529 animals); cow-calf with agriculture (CCA; 1,008 ha; 1,313 animals); rearing-fattening (RFU; 360 ha; 435 animals); and fattening (FU; 205 ha; 168 animals) as well as an integrated system simulating the physical and economic parameters of the four units (IAS; 2,728 ha; 3,445 animals). The four independent units were considered as opportunistic commercialization and IAS as non-opportunistic. The highest yield was obtained for RFU (297 kg/ha), followed by IAS (114 kg/ha), FU (98 kg/ha), CCNP (87 kg/ha), and CCA (83 kg/ha). The CCNP was the most economically efficient, considering the gross margin per kilogram (GM/kg) (US$ 0.93). The GM/kg value of IAS (US$ 0.74) was 37 % higher compared to the sum of the average of the four units (US$ 0.54), and IAS had the lowest total production costs per kg (22.5 %). It was concluded that each independent unit could increase GM/kg (37 %) and GM/ha (3.8 %) and use calves in a rearing-fattening unit for further sale. Hence, the integration of beef production systems increases the gross margin of firms, presenting a profitable business advantage to rural entrepreneurs through non-opportunistic commercialization. © 2022 INIFAP-CENID Parasitologia Veterinaria. All rights reserved.https://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12381/4209enenginfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessAcceso abiertoAnimal productionEconomyGross revenueIntegrationProduction costPLATAFORMA SALUD ANINMALFinancial performance and opportunistic commercialization of beef production systems in southern Brazil.ArticlePublishedVersioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionreponame:AINFOinstname:Instituto Nacional de Investigación Agropecuariainstacron:Instituto Nacional de Investigación AgropecuariaSESSIM, A. G.CANOZZI, M.E.A.PEREIRA, G. R.CASTILHO, E. M.BARCELLOS, J. O. J.SWORDsword-2025-06-23T15:23:57.original.xmlOriginal SWORD entry documentapplication/octet-stream2794https://redi.anii.org.uy/jspui/bitstream/20.500.12381/4209/1/sword-2025-06-23T15%3a23%3a57.original.xml819b605369134759cdab14c384cb9620MD5120.500.12381/42092026-02-10 15:53:56.162oai:redi.anii.org.uy:20.500.12381/4209Institucionalhttps://ainfo.inia.uy/Organismo científico-tecnológicohttp://inia.uyhttps://redi.anii.org.uy/oai/requestlorrego@inia.org.uyUruguayopendoar:2026-02-10T18:53:56AINFO - Instituto Nacional de Investigación Agropecuariafalse
spellingShingle Financial performance and opportunistic commercialization of beef production systems in southern Brazil.
SESSIM, A. G.
Animal production
Economy
Gross revenue
Integration
Production cost
PLATAFORMA SALUD ANINMAL
status_str publishedVersion
title Financial performance and opportunistic commercialization of beef production systems in southern Brazil.
title_full Financial performance and opportunistic commercialization of beef production systems in southern Brazil.
title_fullStr Financial performance and opportunistic commercialization of beef production systems in southern Brazil.
title_full_unstemmed Financial performance and opportunistic commercialization of beef production systems in southern Brazil.
title_short Financial performance and opportunistic commercialization of beef production systems in southern Brazil.
title_sort Financial performance and opportunistic commercialization of beef production systems in southern Brazil.
topic Animal production
Economy
Gross revenue
Integration
Production cost
PLATAFORMA SALUD ANINMAL
url https://ainfo.inia.uy/consulta/busca?b=pc&id=63153&biblioteca=vazio&busca=63153&qFacets=63153