A cautionary report for pathogen identification using shotgun metagenomics; a comparison to aerobic culture and polymerase chain reaction for Salmonella enterica identification.

DOSTER, E. - ROVIRA, P.J. - NOYES, N.R. - BURGESS, B.A. - YANG, X. - WEINROTH, M.D. - LINKE, L. - MAGNUSON, R. - BOUCHER, C. - BELK, K.E. - MORLEY, P.S.

Resumen:

This study was conducted to compare aerobic culture, polymerase chain reaction (PCR), lateral flow immunoassay (LFI), and shotgun metagenomics for identificationof Salmonella enterica in feces collected from feedlot cattle. Samples were analyzed in parallel using all four tests. Results from aerobic culture and PCR were 100%concordant and indicated low S. enterica prevalence (3/60 samples positive). Although low S. enterica prevalence restricted formal statistical comparisons, LFI and deep metagenomic sequencing results were discordant with these results. Specifically, metagenomic analysis using k-mer-based classification against the RefSeq database indicated that 11/60 of samples contained sequence reads that matched to the S. enterica genome and uniquely identified this species of bacteria within the sample. However, further examination revealed that plasmid sequences were often included with bacterial genomic sequence data submitted to NCBI, which can lead to incorrect taxonomic classification. To circumvent this classification problem, we separated all plasmid sequences included in bacterial RefSeq genomes and reassigned them to a unique taxon so that they would not be uniquely associated with specific bacterial species such as S. enterica. Using this revised database and taxonomic structure, we found that only 6/60 samples contained sequences specific for S. enterica, suggesting increased relative specificity. Reads identified as S. enterica in these six samples were further evaluated using BLAST and NCBI?s nr/nt database, which identified that only 2/60 samples contained reads exclusive to S. enterica chromosomal genomes. These two samples were culture- and PCR-negative, suggesting that even deep metagenomic sequencing suffers from lower sensitivity and specificity in comparison to more traditional pathogen detection methods. Additionally, no sample reads were taxonomically classified as S. enterica with two other metagenomic tools, Metagenomic Intra-species Diversity Analysis System (MIDAS) and Metagenomic Phylogenetic Analysis 2 (MetaPhlAn2). This study re-affirmed that the traditional techniques of aerobic culture and PCR provide similar results for S. enterica identification in cattle feces. On the other hand, metagenomic results are highly influenced by the classification method and reference database employed. These results highlight the nuances of computational detection of species-level sequences within short-read metagenomic sequence data, and emphasize the need for cautious interpretation of such results.


Detalles Bibliográficos
2019
SHOTGUN METAGENOMICS
SALMONELLA ENTERICA
CULTURE
PCR
PATHOGEN IDENTIFICATION
CATTLE
VACAS
FEEDLOT
Inglés
Instituto Nacional de Investigación Agropecuaria
AINFO
http://www.ainfo.inia.uy/consulta/busca?b=pc&id=60378&biblioteca=vazio&busca=60378&qFacets=60378
Acceso abierto
_version_ 1805580533964472320
author DOSTER, E.
author2 ROVIRA, P.J.
NOYES, N.R.
BURGESS, B.A.
YANG, X.
WEINROTH, M.D.
LINKE, L.
MAGNUSON, R.
BOUCHER, C.
BELK, K.E.
MORLEY, P.S.
author2_role author
author
author
author
author
author
author
author
author
author
author_facet DOSTER, E.
ROVIRA, P.J.
NOYES, N.R.
BURGESS, B.A.
YANG, X.
WEINROTH, M.D.
LINKE, L.
MAGNUSON, R.
BOUCHER, C.
BELK, K.E.
MORLEY, P.S.
author_role author
bitstream.checksum.fl_str_mv 259ec6599c47b6d507b3e39e09713a4b
bitstream.checksumAlgorithm.fl_str_mv MD5
bitstream.url.fl_str_mv https://redi.anii.org.uy/jspui/bitstream/20.500.12381/1090/1/sword-2022-10-20T22%3a26%3a31.original.xml
collection AINFO
dc.creator.none.fl_str_mv DOSTER, E.
ROVIRA, P.J.
NOYES, N.R.
BURGESS, B.A.
YANG, X.
WEINROTH, M.D.
LINKE, L.
MAGNUSON, R.
BOUCHER, C.
BELK, K.E.
MORLEY, P.S.
dc.date.accessioned.none.fl_str_mv 2022-10-21T01:26:31Z
dc.date.available.none.fl_str_mv 2022-10-21T01:26:31Z
dc.date.issued.none.fl_str_mv 2019
dc.date.updated.none.fl_str_mv 2022-10-21T01:26:31Z
dc.description.abstract.none.fl_txt_mv This study was conducted to compare aerobic culture, polymerase chain reaction (PCR), lateral flow immunoassay (LFI), and shotgun metagenomics for identificationof Salmonella enterica in feces collected from feedlot cattle. Samples were analyzed in parallel using all four tests. Results from aerobic culture and PCR were 100%concordant and indicated low S. enterica prevalence (3/60 samples positive). Although low S. enterica prevalence restricted formal statistical comparisons, LFI and deep metagenomic sequencing results were discordant with these results. Specifically, metagenomic analysis using k-mer-based classification against the RefSeq database indicated that 11/60 of samples contained sequence reads that matched to the S. enterica genome and uniquely identified this species of bacteria within the sample. However, further examination revealed that plasmid sequences were often included with bacterial genomic sequence data submitted to NCBI, which can lead to incorrect taxonomic classification. To circumvent this classification problem, we separated all plasmid sequences included in bacterial RefSeq genomes and reassigned them to a unique taxon so that they would not be uniquely associated with specific bacterial species such as S. enterica. Using this revised database and taxonomic structure, we found that only 6/60 samples contained sequences specific for S. enterica, suggesting increased relative specificity. Reads identified as S. enterica in these six samples were further evaluated using BLAST and NCBI?s nr/nt database, which identified that only 2/60 samples contained reads exclusive to S. enterica chromosomal genomes. These two samples were culture- and PCR-negative, suggesting that even deep metagenomic sequencing suffers from lower sensitivity and specificity in comparison to more traditional pathogen detection methods. Additionally, no sample reads were taxonomically classified as S. enterica with two other metagenomic tools, Metagenomic Intra-species Diversity Analysis System (MIDAS) and Metagenomic Phylogenetic Analysis 2 (MetaPhlAn2). This study re-affirmed that the traditional techniques of aerobic culture and PCR provide similar results for S. enterica identification in cattle feces. On the other hand, metagenomic results are highly influenced by the classification method and reference database employed. These results highlight the nuances of computational detection of species-level sequences within short-read metagenomic sequence data, and emphasize the need for cautious interpretation of such results.
dc.identifier.none.fl_str_mv http://www.ainfo.inia.uy/consulta/busca?b=pc&id=60378&biblioteca=vazio&busca=60378&qFacets=60378
dc.language.iso.none.fl_str_mv en
eng
dc.rights.es.fl_str_mv Acceso abierto
dc.rights.none.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv reponame:AINFO
instname:Instituto Nacional de Investigación Agropecuaria
instacron:Instituto Nacional de Investigación Agropecuaria
dc.subject.none.fl_str_mv SHOTGUN METAGENOMICS
SALMONELLA ENTERICA
CULTURE
PCR
PATHOGEN IDENTIFICATION
CATTLE
VACAS
FEEDLOT
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv A cautionary report for pathogen identification using shotgun metagenomics; a comparison to aerobic culture and polymerase chain reaction for Salmonella enterica identification.
dc.type.none.fl_str_mv Article
PublishedVersion
info:eu-repo/semantics/article
dc.type.version.none.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
description This study was conducted to compare aerobic culture, polymerase chain reaction (PCR), lateral flow immunoassay (LFI), and shotgun metagenomics for identificationof Salmonella enterica in feces collected from feedlot cattle. Samples were analyzed in parallel using all four tests. Results from aerobic culture and PCR were 100%concordant and indicated low S. enterica prevalence (3/60 samples positive). Although low S. enterica prevalence restricted formal statistical comparisons, LFI and deep metagenomic sequencing results were discordant with these results. Specifically, metagenomic analysis using k-mer-based classification against the RefSeq database indicated that 11/60 of samples contained sequence reads that matched to the S. enterica genome and uniquely identified this species of bacteria within the sample. However, further examination revealed that plasmid sequences were often included with bacterial genomic sequence data submitted to NCBI, which can lead to incorrect taxonomic classification. To circumvent this classification problem, we separated all plasmid sequences included in bacterial RefSeq genomes and reassigned them to a unique taxon so that they would not be uniquely associated with specific bacterial species such as S. enterica. Using this revised database and taxonomic structure, we found that only 6/60 samples contained sequences specific for S. enterica, suggesting increased relative specificity. Reads identified as S. enterica in these six samples were further evaluated using BLAST and NCBI?s nr/nt database, which identified that only 2/60 samples contained reads exclusive to S. enterica chromosomal genomes. These two samples were culture- and PCR-negative, suggesting that even deep metagenomic sequencing suffers from lower sensitivity and specificity in comparison to more traditional pathogen detection methods. Additionally, no sample reads were taxonomically classified as S. enterica with two other metagenomic tools, Metagenomic Intra-species Diversity Analysis System (MIDAS) and Metagenomic Phylogenetic Analysis 2 (MetaPhlAn2). This study re-affirmed that the traditional techniques of aerobic culture and PCR provide similar results for S. enterica identification in cattle feces. On the other hand, metagenomic results are highly influenced by the classification method and reference database employed. These results highlight the nuances of computational detection of species-level sequences within short-read metagenomic sequence data, and emphasize the need for cautious interpretation of such results.
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
format article
id INIAOAI_a001e6a3c2d29becef0aedc8fa538968
instacron_str Instituto Nacional de Investigación Agropecuaria
institution Instituto Nacional de Investigación Agropecuaria
instname_str Instituto Nacional de Investigación Agropecuaria
language eng
language_invalid_str_mv en
network_acronym_str INIAOAI
network_name_str AINFO
oai_identifier_str oai:redi.anii.org.uy:20.500.12381/1090
publishDate 2019
reponame_str AINFO
repository.mail.fl_str_mv lorrego@inia.org.uy
repository.name.fl_str_mv AINFO - Instituto Nacional de Investigación Agropecuaria
repository_id_str
rights_invalid_str_mv Acceso abierto
spelling 2022-10-21T01:26:31Z2022-10-21T01:26:31Z20192022-10-21T01:26:31Zhttp://www.ainfo.inia.uy/consulta/busca?b=pc&id=60378&biblioteca=vazio&busca=60378&qFacets=60378This study was conducted to compare aerobic culture, polymerase chain reaction (PCR), lateral flow immunoassay (LFI), and shotgun metagenomics for identificationof Salmonella enterica in feces collected from feedlot cattle. Samples were analyzed in parallel using all four tests. Results from aerobic culture and PCR were 100%concordant and indicated low S. enterica prevalence (3/60 samples positive). Although low S. enterica prevalence restricted formal statistical comparisons, LFI and deep metagenomic sequencing results were discordant with these results. Specifically, metagenomic analysis using k-mer-based classification against the RefSeq database indicated that 11/60 of samples contained sequence reads that matched to the S. enterica genome and uniquely identified this species of bacteria within the sample. However, further examination revealed that plasmid sequences were often included with bacterial genomic sequence data submitted to NCBI, which can lead to incorrect taxonomic classification. To circumvent this classification problem, we separated all plasmid sequences included in bacterial RefSeq genomes and reassigned them to a unique taxon so that they would not be uniquely associated with specific bacterial species such as S. enterica. Using this revised database and taxonomic structure, we found that only 6/60 samples contained sequences specific for S. enterica, suggesting increased relative specificity. Reads identified as S. enterica in these six samples were further evaluated using BLAST and NCBI?s nr/nt database, which identified that only 2/60 samples contained reads exclusive to S. enterica chromosomal genomes. These two samples were culture- and PCR-negative, suggesting that even deep metagenomic sequencing suffers from lower sensitivity and specificity in comparison to more traditional pathogen detection methods. Additionally, no sample reads were taxonomically classified as S. enterica with two other metagenomic tools, Metagenomic Intra-species Diversity Analysis System (MIDAS) and Metagenomic Phylogenetic Analysis 2 (MetaPhlAn2). This study re-affirmed that the traditional techniques of aerobic culture and PCR provide similar results for S. enterica identification in cattle feces. On the other hand, metagenomic results are highly influenced by the classification method and reference database employed. These results highlight the nuances of computational detection of species-level sequences within short-read metagenomic sequence data, and emphasize the need for cautious interpretation of such results.https://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12381/1090enenginfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessAcceso abiertoSHOTGUN METAGENOMICSSALMONELLA ENTERICACULTUREPCRPATHOGEN IDENTIFICATIONCATTLEVACASFEEDLOTA cautionary report for pathogen identification using shotgun metagenomics; a comparison to aerobic culture and polymerase chain reaction for Salmonella enterica identification.ArticlePublishedVersioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionreponame:AINFOinstname:Instituto Nacional de Investigación Agropecuariainstacron:Instituto Nacional de Investigación AgropecuariaDOSTER, E.ROVIRA, P.J.NOYES, N.R.BURGESS, B.A.YANG, X.WEINROTH, M.D.LINKE, L.MAGNUSON, R.BOUCHER, C.BELK, K.E.MORLEY, P.S.SWORDsword-2022-10-20T22:26:31.original.xmlOriginal SWORD entry documentapplication/octet-stream4238https://redi.anii.org.uy/jspui/bitstream/20.500.12381/1090/1/sword-2022-10-20T22%3a26%3a31.original.xml259ec6599c47b6d507b3e39e09713a4bMD5120.500.12381/10902022-10-20 22:26:31.688oai:redi.anii.org.uy:20.500.12381/1090Gobiernohttp://inia.uyhttps://redi.anii.org.uy/oai/requestlorrego@inia.org.uyUruguayopendoar:2022-10-21T01:26:31AINFO - Instituto Nacional de Investigación Agropecuariafalse
spellingShingle A cautionary report for pathogen identification using shotgun metagenomics; a comparison to aerobic culture and polymerase chain reaction for Salmonella enterica identification.
DOSTER, E.
SHOTGUN METAGENOMICS
SALMONELLA ENTERICA
CULTURE
PCR
PATHOGEN IDENTIFICATION
CATTLE
VACAS
FEEDLOT
status_str publishedVersion
title A cautionary report for pathogen identification using shotgun metagenomics; a comparison to aerobic culture and polymerase chain reaction for Salmonella enterica identification.
title_full A cautionary report for pathogen identification using shotgun metagenomics; a comparison to aerobic culture and polymerase chain reaction for Salmonella enterica identification.
title_fullStr A cautionary report for pathogen identification using shotgun metagenomics; a comparison to aerobic culture and polymerase chain reaction for Salmonella enterica identification.
title_full_unstemmed A cautionary report for pathogen identification using shotgun metagenomics; a comparison to aerobic culture and polymerase chain reaction for Salmonella enterica identification.
title_short A cautionary report for pathogen identification using shotgun metagenomics; a comparison to aerobic culture and polymerase chain reaction for Salmonella enterica identification.
title_sort A cautionary report for pathogen identification using shotgun metagenomics; a comparison to aerobic culture and polymerase chain reaction for Salmonella enterica identification.
topic SHOTGUN METAGENOMICS
SALMONELLA ENTERICA
CULTURE
PCR
PATHOGEN IDENTIFICATION
CATTLE
VACAS
FEEDLOT
url http://www.ainfo.inia.uy/consulta/busca?b=pc&id=60378&biblioteca=vazio&busca=60378&qFacets=60378