Contrasting tall fescue seed production systems: case studies. [abstract].

ROSSI, C. - MARI, M. - ARAMENDIA, J. - CASTRO, M.

Resumen:

ABSTRACT.- Two tall fescue seed production fields (A and B) with some similarities but with important differences on the technology used were contrasted. Similarities: same cultivar (Rizar), an early, rhizomatous, with good seed potential production; new crops (two- and three-years old fieldareas); grazed from January to June; free of pests; 100 kg/ha of nitrogen in August/September and windrowed at the middle of November. Differences: 185 (A) vs 80 (B) kg/ha of nitrogen during fall and winter; rainfed (A) vs 165 mm of irrigation in 14 times form middle of Augustto windrowing (B), and harvest five days after windrowing with 15% seed humidity and artificial drying (A) vs harvest 14 days after windrowing with less than 9% seed humidity (B).

Detalles Bibliográficos
2023
Tall fescue
Seed production
Irrigation
Seed losses
UNIDAD DE SEMILLAS Y RECURSOS FITOGENÉTICOS - INIA
Inglés
Instituto Nacional de Investigación Agropecuaria
AINFO
https://ainfo.inia.uy/consulta/busca?b=pc&id=64652&biblioteca=vazio&busca=64652&qFacets=64652
Acceso abierto
_version_ 1856772342788653056
author ROSSI, C.
author2 MARI, M.
ARAMENDIA, J.
CASTRO, M.
author2_role author
author
author
author_facet ROSSI, C.
MARI, M.
ARAMENDIA, J.
CASTRO, M.
author_role author
bitstream.checksum.fl_str_mv fafb62838efb27ff069636c7979b31d0
bitstream.checksumAlgorithm.fl_str_mv MD5
bitstream.url.fl_str_mv https://redi.anii.org.uy/jspui/bitstream/20.500.12381/4759/1/sword-2025-06-23T15%3a40%3a28.original.xml
collection AINFO
dc.creator.none.fl_str_mv ROSSI, C.
MARI, M.
ARAMENDIA, J.
CASTRO, M.
dc.date.accessioned.none.fl_str_mv 2025-06-23T18:40:28Z
dc.date.available.none.fl_str_mv 2025-06-23T18:40:28Z
dc.date.issued.none.fl_str_mv 2023
dc.date.updated.none.fl_str_mv 2025-06-23T18:40:28Z
dc.description.abstract.none.fl_txt_mv ABSTRACT.- Two tall fescue seed production fields (A and B) with some similarities but with important differences on the technology used were contrasted. Similarities: same cultivar (Rizar), an early, rhizomatous, with good seed potential production; new crops (two- and three-years old fieldareas); grazed from January to June; free of pests; 100 kg/ha of nitrogen in August/September and windrowed at the middle of November. Differences: 185 (A) vs 80 (B) kg/ha of nitrogen during fall and winter; rainfed (A) vs 165 mm of irrigation in 14 times form middle of Augustto windrowing (B), and harvest five days after windrowing with 15% seed humidity and artificial drying (A) vs harvest 14 days after windrowing with less than 9% seed humidity (B).
dc.identifier.none.fl_str_mv https://ainfo.inia.uy/consulta/busca?b=pc&id=64652&biblioteca=vazio&busca=64652&qFacets=64652
dc.language.iso.none.fl_str_mv en
eng
dc.rights.es.fl_str_mv Acceso abierto
dc.rights.none.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv reponame:AINFO
instname:Instituto Nacional de Investigación Agropecuaria
instacron:Instituto Nacional de Investigación Agropecuaria
dc.subject.none.fl_str_mv Tall fescue
Seed production
Irrigation
Seed losses
UNIDAD DE SEMILLAS Y RECURSOS FITOGENÉTICOS - INIA
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Contrasting tall fescue seed production systems: case studies. [abstract].
dc.type.none.fl_str_mv ConferenceObject
PublishedVersion
info:eu-repo/semantics/conferenceObject
dc.type.version.none.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
description ABSTRACT.- Two tall fescue seed production fields (A and B) with some similarities but with important differences on the technology used were contrasted. Similarities: same cultivar (Rizar), an early, rhizomatous, with good seed potential production; new crops (two- and three-years old fieldareas); grazed from January to June; free of pests; 100 kg/ha of nitrogen in August/September and windrowed at the middle of November. Differences: 185 (A) vs 80 (B) kg/ha of nitrogen during fall and winter; rainfed (A) vs 165 mm of irrigation in 14 times form middle of Augustto windrowing (B), and harvest five days after windrowing with 15% seed humidity and artificial drying (A) vs harvest 14 days after windrowing with less than 9% seed humidity (B).
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
format conferenceObject
id INIAOAI_9201f1e2189019dd6daa78e4319494df
instacron_str Instituto Nacional de Investigación Agropecuaria
institution Instituto Nacional de Investigación Agropecuaria
instname_str Instituto Nacional de Investigación Agropecuaria
language eng
language_invalid_str_mv en
network_acronym_str INIAOAI
network_name_str AINFO
oai_identifier_str oai:redi.anii.org.uy:20.500.12381/4759
publishDate 2023
reponame_str AINFO
repository.mail.fl_str_mv lorrego@inia.org.uy
repository.name.fl_str_mv AINFO - Instituto Nacional de Investigación Agropecuaria
repository_id_str
rights_invalid_str_mv Acceso abierto
spelling 2025-06-23T18:40:28Z2025-06-23T18:40:28Z20232025-06-23T18:40:28Zhttps://ainfo.inia.uy/consulta/busca?b=pc&id=64652&biblioteca=vazio&busca=64652&qFacets=64652ABSTRACT.- Two tall fescue seed production fields (A and B) with some similarities but with important differences on the technology used were contrasted. Similarities: same cultivar (Rizar), an early, rhizomatous, with good seed potential production; new crops (two- and three-years old fieldareas); grazed from January to June; free of pests; 100 kg/ha of nitrogen in August/September and windrowed at the middle of November. Differences: 185 (A) vs 80 (B) kg/ha of nitrogen during fall and winter; rainfed (A) vs 165 mm of irrigation in 14 times form middle of Augustto windrowing (B), and harvest five days after windrowing with 15% seed humidity and artificial drying (A) vs harvest 14 days after windrowing with less than 9% seed humidity (B).https://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12381/4759enenginfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessAcceso abiertoTall fescueSeed productionIrrigationSeed lossesUNIDAD DE SEMILLAS Y RECURSOS FITOGENÉTICOS - INIAContrasting tall fescue seed production systems: case studies. [abstract].ConferenceObjectPublishedVersioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/conferenceObjectinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionreponame:AINFOinstname:Instituto Nacional de Investigación Agropecuariainstacron:Instituto Nacional de Investigación AgropecuariaROSSI, C.MARI, M.ARAMENDIA, J.CASTRO, M.SWORDsword-2025-06-23T15:40:28.original.xmlOriginal SWORD entry documentapplication/octet-stream1872https://redi.anii.org.uy/jspui/bitstream/20.500.12381/4759/1/sword-2025-06-23T15%3a40%3a28.original.xmlfafb62838efb27ff069636c7979b31d0MD5120.500.12381/47592026-02-10 15:54:00.562oai:redi.anii.org.uy:20.500.12381/4759Institucionalhttps://ainfo.inia.uy/Organismo científico-tecnológicohttp://inia.uyhttps://redi.anii.org.uy/oai/requestlorrego@inia.org.uyUruguayopendoar:2026-02-10T18:54AINFO - Instituto Nacional de Investigación Agropecuariafalse
spellingShingle Contrasting tall fescue seed production systems: case studies. [abstract].
ROSSI, C.
Tall fescue
Seed production
Irrigation
Seed losses
UNIDAD DE SEMILLAS Y RECURSOS FITOGENÉTICOS - INIA
status_str publishedVersion
title Contrasting tall fescue seed production systems: case studies. [abstract].
title_full Contrasting tall fescue seed production systems: case studies. [abstract].
title_fullStr Contrasting tall fescue seed production systems: case studies. [abstract].
title_full_unstemmed Contrasting tall fescue seed production systems: case studies. [abstract].
title_short Contrasting tall fescue seed production systems: case studies. [abstract].
title_sort Contrasting tall fescue seed production systems: case studies. [abstract].
topic Tall fescue
Seed production
Irrigation
Seed losses
UNIDAD DE SEMILLAS Y RECURSOS FITOGENÉTICOS - INIA
url https://ainfo.inia.uy/consulta/busca?b=pc&id=64652&biblioteca=vazio&busca=64652&qFacets=64652