Feed additives for methane mitigation: Recommendations for testing enteric methane-mitigating feed additives in ruminant studies. (Review).

HRISTOV, A. N. - BANNINK, A. - BATTELLI, M. - BELANCHE, A. - CAJARVILLE, M. C. - FERNANDEZ, G. - GARCÍA, F. - JONKER, A. - KENNY, D. A. - LIND, V. - MEALE, S. J. - MEO ZILIO, D. - MUÑÓZ, C. - PACHECO, D. - PEIREN, N. - RAMIN, M. - RAPETTI, L. - SCHWARM, A. - STERGIADIS, S. - THEODORIDOU, K. - UNGERFELD´, E. M. - VAN GASTELEN, S. - YÁÑEZ-RUIZ, D. R. - WATERS, S. M. - LUND, P.

Resumen:

ABSTRACT.- There is a need for rigorous and scientifically-based testing standards for existing and new enteric methane mitigation technologies, including antimethanogenic feed additives (AMFA). The current review provides guidelines for conducting and analyzing data from experiments with ruminants intended to test the antimethanogenic and production effects of feed additives. Recommendations include study design and statistical analysis of the data, dietary effects, associative effect of AMFA with other mitigation strategies, appropriate methods for measuring methane emissions, production and physiological responses to AMFA, and their effects on animal health and product quality. Animal experiments should be planned based on clear hypotheses, and experimental designs must be chosen to best answer the scientific questions asked, with pre-experimental power analysis and robust post-experimental statistical analyses being important requisites. Long-term studies for evaluating AMFA are currently lacking and are highly needed. Experimental conditions should be representative of the production system of interest, so results and conclusions are applicable and practical. Methane-mitigating effects of AMFA may be combined with other mitigation strategies to explore additivity and synergism, as well as trade-offs, including relevant manure emissions, and these need to be studied in appropriately designed experiments. Methane emissions can be successfully measured, and efficacy of AMFA determined, using respiration chambers, the sulfur hexafluoride method, and the GreenFeed system. Other techniques, such as hood and face masks, can also be used in short-term studies, ensuring they do not significantly affect feed intake, feeding behavior, and animal production. For the success of an AMFA, it is critically important that representative animal production data are collected, analyzed, and reported. In addition, evaluating the effects of AMFA on nutrient digestibility, animal physiology, animal health and reproduction, product quality, and how AMFA interact with nutrient composition of the diet is necessary and should be conducted at various stages of the evaluation process. The authors emphasize that enteric methane mitigation claims should not be made until the efficacy of AMFA is confirmed in animal studies designed and conducted considering the guidelines provided herein. © 2025, The Authors. Published by Elsevier Inc. on behalf of the American Dairy Science Association®.

Detalles Bibliográficos
2025
Feed additive
Enteric methane mitigation
Guideline
Ruminant animal
SISTEMA GANADERO EXTENSIVO - INIA
Inglés
Instituto Nacional de Investigación Agropecuaria
AINFO
https://ainfo.inia.uy/consulta/busca?b=pc&id=65032&biblioteca=vazio&busca=65032&qFacets=65032
Acceso abierto
_version_ 1856772343686234112
author HRISTOV, A. N.
author2 BANNINK, A.
BATTELLI, M.
BELANCHE, A.
CAJARVILLE, M. C.
FERNANDEZ, G.
GARCÍA, F.
JONKER, A.
KENNY, D. A.
LIND, V.
MEALE, S. J.
MEO ZILIO, D.
MUÑÓZ, C.
PACHECO, D.
PEIREN, N.
RAMIN, M.
RAPETTI, L.
SCHWARM, A.
STERGIADIS, S.
THEODORIDOU, K.
UNGERFELD´, E. M.
VAN GASTELEN, S.
YÁÑEZ-RUIZ, D. R.
WATERS, S. M.
LUND, P.
author2_role author
author
author
author
author
author
author
author
author
author
author
author
author
author
author
author
author
author
author
author
author
author
author
author
author_facet HRISTOV, A. N.
BANNINK, A.
BATTELLI, M.
BELANCHE, A.
CAJARVILLE, M. C.
FERNANDEZ, G.
GARCÍA, F.
JONKER, A.
KENNY, D. A.
LIND, V.
MEALE, S. J.
MEO ZILIO, D.
MUÑÓZ, C.
PACHECO, D.
PEIREN, N.
RAMIN, M.
RAPETTI, L.
SCHWARM, A.
STERGIADIS, S.
THEODORIDOU, K.
UNGERFELD´, E. M.
VAN GASTELEN, S.
YÁÑEZ-RUIZ, D. R.
WATERS, S. M.
LUND, P.
author_role author
bitstream.checksum.fl_str_mv 70abc8cf20893310267a3ce8d1e04153
bitstream.checksumAlgorithm.fl_str_mv MD5
bitstream.url.fl_str_mv https://redi.anii.org.uy/jspui/bitstream/20.500.12381/4982/1/sword-2025-06-23T15%3a46%3a53.original.xml
collection AINFO
dc.creator.none.fl_str_mv HRISTOV, A. N.
BANNINK, A.
BATTELLI, M.
BELANCHE, A.
CAJARVILLE, M. C.
FERNANDEZ, G.
GARCÍA, F.
JONKER, A.
KENNY, D. A.
LIND, V.
MEALE, S. J.
MEO ZILIO, D.
MUÑÓZ, C.
PACHECO, D.
PEIREN, N.
RAMIN, M.
RAPETTI, L.
SCHWARM, A.
STERGIADIS, S.
THEODORIDOU, K.
UNGERFELD´, E. M.
VAN GASTELEN, S.
YÁÑEZ-RUIZ, D. R.
WATERS, S. M.
LUND, P.
dc.date.accessioned.none.fl_str_mv 2025-06-23T18:46:53Z
dc.date.available.none.fl_str_mv 2025-06-23T18:46:53Z
dc.date.issued.none.fl_str_mv 2025
dc.date.updated.none.fl_str_mv 2025-06-23T18:46:53Z
dc.description.abstract.none.fl_txt_mv ABSTRACT.- There is a need for rigorous and scientifically-based testing standards for existing and new enteric methane mitigation technologies, including antimethanogenic feed additives (AMFA). The current review provides guidelines for conducting and analyzing data from experiments with ruminants intended to test the antimethanogenic and production effects of feed additives. Recommendations include study design and statistical analysis of the data, dietary effects, associative effect of AMFA with other mitigation strategies, appropriate methods for measuring methane emissions, production and physiological responses to AMFA, and their effects on animal health and product quality. Animal experiments should be planned based on clear hypotheses, and experimental designs must be chosen to best answer the scientific questions asked, with pre-experimental power analysis and robust post-experimental statistical analyses being important requisites. Long-term studies for evaluating AMFA are currently lacking and are highly needed. Experimental conditions should be representative of the production system of interest, so results and conclusions are applicable and practical. Methane-mitigating effects of AMFA may be combined with other mitigation strategies to explore additivity and synergism, as well as trade-offs, including relevant manure emissions, and these need to be studied in appropriately designed experiments. Methane emissions can be successfully measured, and efficacy of AMFA determined, using respiration chambers, the sulfur hexafluoride method, and the GreenFeed system. Other techniques, such as hood and face masks, can also be used in short-term studies, ensuring they do not significantly affect feed intake, feeding behavior, and animal production. For the success of an AMFA, it is critically important that representative animal production data are collected, analyzed, and reported. In addition, evaluating the effects of AMFA on nutrient digestibility, animal physiology, animal health and reproduction, product quality, and how AMFA interact with nutrient composition of the diet is necessary and should be conducted at various stages of the evaluation process. The authors emphasize that enteric methane mitigation claims should not be made until the efficacy of AMFA is confirmed in animal studies designed and conducted considering the guidelines provided herein. © 2025, The Authors. Published by Elsevier Inc. on behalf of the American Dairy Science Association®.
dc.identifier.none.fl_str_mv https://ainfo.inia.uy/consulta/busca?b=pc&id=65032&biblioteca=vazio&busca=65032&qFacets=65032
dc.language.iso.none.fl_str_mv en
eng
dc.rights.es.fl_str_mv Acceso abierto
dc.rights.none.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv reponame:AINFO
instname:Instituto Nacional de Investigación Agropecuaria
instacron:Instituto Nacional de Investigación Agropecuaria
dc.subject.none.fl_str_mv Feed additive
Enteric methane mitigation
Guideline
Ruminant animal
SISTEMA GANADERO EXTENSIVO - INIA
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Feed additives for methane mitigation: Recommendations for testing enteric methane-mitigating feed additives in ruminant studies. (Review).
dc.type.none.fl_str_mv Article
PublishedVersion
info:eu-repo/semantics/article
dc.type.version.none.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
description ABSTRACT.- There is a need for rigorous and scientifically-based testing standards for existing and new enteric methane mitigation technologies, including antimethanogenic feed additives (AMFA). The current review provides guidelines for conducting and analyzing data from experiments with ruminants intended to test the antimethanogenic and production effects of feed additives. Recommendations include study design and statistical analysis of the data, dietary effects, associative effect of AMFA with other mitigation strategies, appropriate methods for measuring methane emissions, production and physiological responses to AMFA, and their effects on animal health and product quality. Animal experiments should be planned based on clear hypotheses, and experimental designs must be chosen to best answer the scientific questions asked, with pre-experimental power analysis and robust post-experimental statistical analyses being important requisites. Long-term studies for evaluating AMFA are currently lacking and are highly needed. Experimental conditions should be representative of the production system of interest, so results and conclusions are applicable and practical. Methane-mitigating effects of AMFA may be combined with other mitigation strategies to explore additivity and synergism, as well as trade-offs, including relevant manure emissions, and these need to be studied in appropriately designed experiments. Methane emissions can be successfully measured, and efficacy of AMFA determined, using respiration chambers, the sulfur hexafluoride method, and the GreenFeed system. Other techniques, such as hood and face masks, can also be used in short-term studies, ensuring they do not significantly affect feed intake, feeding behavior, and animal production. For the success of an AMFA, it is critically important that representative animal production data are collected, analyzed, and reported. In addition, evaluating the effects of AMFA on nutrient digestibility, animal physiology, animal health and reproduction, product quality, and how AMFA interact with nutrient composition of the diet is necessary and should be conducted at various stages of the evaluation process. The authors emphasize that enteric methane mitigation claims should not be made until the efficacy of AMFA is confirmed in animal studies designed and conducted considering the guidelines provided herein. © 2025, The Authors. Published by Elsevier Inc. on behalf of the American Dairy Science Association®.
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
format article
id INIAOAI_41a0aa33f53a433bac2d726866100c30
instacron_str Instituto Nacional de Investigación Agropecuaria
institution Instituto Nacional de Investigación Agropecuaria
instname_str Instituto Nacional de Investigación Agropecuaria
language eng
language_invalid_str_mv en
network_acronym_str INIAOAI
network_name_str AINFO
oai_identifier_str oai:redi.anii.org.uy:20.500.12381/4982
publishDate 2025
reponame_str AINFO
repository.mail.fl_str_mv lorrego@inia.org.uy
repository.name.fl_str_mv AINFO - Instituto Nacional de Investigación Agropecuaria
repository_id_str
rights_invalid_str_mv Acceso abierto
spelling 2025-06-23T18:46:53Z2025-06-23T18:46:53Z20252025-06-23T18:46:53Zhttps://ainfo.inia.uy/consulta/busca?b=pc&id=65032&biblioteca=vazio&busca=65032&qFacets=65032ABSTRACT.- There is a need for rigorous and scientifically-based testing standards for existing and new enteric methane mitigation technologies, including antimethanogenic feed additives (AMFA). The current review provides guidelines for conducting and analyzing data from experiments with ruminants intended to test the antimethanogenic and production effects of feed additives. Recommendations include study design and statistical analysis of the data, dietary effects, associative effect of AMFA with other mitigation strategies, appropriate methods for measuring methane emissions, production and physiological responses to AMFA, and their effects on animal health and product quality. Animal experiments should be planned based on clear hypotheses, and experimental designs must be chosen to best answer the scientific questions asked, with pre-experimental power analysis and robust post-experimental statistical analyses being important requisites. Long-term studies for evaluating AMFA are currently lacking and are highly needed. Experimental conditions should be representative of the production system of interest, so results and conclusions are applicable and practical. Methane-mitigating effects of AMFA may be combined with other mitigation strategies to explore additivity and synergism, as well as trade-offs, including relevant manure emissions, and these need to be studied in appropriately designed experiments. Methane emissions can be successfully measured, and efficacy of AMFA determined, using respiration chambers, the sulfur hexafluoride method, and the GreenFeed system. Other techniques, such as hood and face masks, can also be used in short-term studies, ensuring they do not significantly affect feed intake, feeding behavior, and animal production. For the success of an AMFA, it is critically important that representative animal production data are collected, analyzed, and reported. In addition, evaluating the effects of AMFA on nutrient digestibility, animal physiology, animal health and reproduction, product quality, and how AMFA interact with nutrient composition of the diet is necessary and should be conducted at various stages of the evaluation process. The authors emphasize that enteric methane mitigation claims should not be made until the efficacy of AMFA is confirmed in animal studies designed and conducted considering the guidelines provided herein. © 2025, The Authors. Published by Elsevier Inc. on behalf of the American Dairy Science Association®.https://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12381/4982enenginfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessAcceso abiertoFeed additiveEnteric methane mitigationGuidelineRuminant animalSISTEMA GANADERO EXTENSIVO - INIAFeed additives for methane mitigation: Recommendations for testing enteric methane-mitigating feed additives in ruminant studies. (Review).ArticlePublishedVersioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionreponame:AINFOinstname:Instituto Nacional de Investigación Agropecuariainstacron:Instituto Nacional de Investigación AgropecuariaHRISTOV, A. N.BANNINK, A.BATTELLI, M.BELANCHE, A.CAJARVILLE, M. C.FERNANDEZ, G.GARCÍA, F.JONKER, A.KENNY, D. A.LIND, V.MEALE, S. J.MEO ZILIO, D.MUÑÓZ, C.PACHECO, D.PEIREN, N.RAMIN, M.RAPETTI, L.SCHWARM, A.STERGIADIS, S.THEODORIDOU, K.UNGERFELD´, E. M.VAN GASTELEN, S.YÁÑEZ-RUIZ, D. R.WATERS, S. M.LUND, P.SWORDsword-2025-06-23T15:46:53.original.xmlOriginal SWORD entry documentapplication/octet-stream4755https://redi.anii.org.uy/jspui/bitstream/20.500.12381/4982/1/sword-2025-06-23T15%3a46%3a53.original.xml70abc8cf20893310267a3ce8d1e04153MD5120.500.12381/49822026-02-10 15:54:03.495oai:redi.anii.org.uy:20.500.12381/4982Institucionalhttps://ainfo.inia.uy/Organismo científico-tecnológicohttp://inia.uyhttps://redi.anii.org.uy/oai/requestlorrego@inia.org.uyUruguayopendoar:2026-02-10T18:54:03AINFO - Instituto Nacional de Investigación Agropecuariafalse
spellingShingle Feed additives for methane mitigation: Recommendations for testing enteric methane-mitigating feed additives in ruminant studies. (Review).
HRISTOV, A. N.
Feed additive
Enteric methane mitigation
Guideline
Ruminant animal
SISTEMA GANADERO EXTENSIVO - INIA
status_str publishedVersion
title Feed additives for methane mitigation: Recommendations for testing enteric methane-mitigating feed additives in ruminant studies. (Review).
title_full Feed additives for methane mitigation: Recommendations for testing enteric methane-mitigating feed additives in ruminant studies. (Review).
title_fullStr Feed additives for methane mitigation: Recommendations for testing enteric methane-mitigating feed additives in ruminant studies. (Review).
title_full_unstemmed Feed additives for methane mitigation: Recommendations for testing enteric methane-mitigating feed additives in ruminant studies. (Review).
title_short Feed additives for methane mitigation: Recommendations for testing enteric methane-mitigating feed additives in ruminant studies. (Review).
title_sort Feed additives for methane mitigation: Recommendations for testing enteric methane-mitigating feed additives in ruminant studies. (Review).
topic Feed additive
Enteric methane mitigation
Guideline
Ruminant animal
SISTEMA GANADERO EXTENSIVO - INIA
url https://ainfo.inia.uy/consulta/busca?b=pc&id=65032&biblioteca=vazio&busca=65032&qFacets=65032