Prevalence and Factors Associated with Anthelmintic Resistance in Gastrointestinal Nematodes of Cattle: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.
Resumen:
A systematic review and meta-analysis was conducted with the aim to measure the prevalence of anthelmintic resistance (AR) in cattle gastrointestinal nematodes (GIN) and potential management factors associated with development of such resistance. A search algorithm was constructed and a comprehensive search of the primaryliterature was conducted in: CAB abstracts (1990-2016), Medline (1860-2016), Agricola (1924-2016) and Lilacs (1985-2016). Prevalence estimates were combined through meta-analysis (MA) using the logit prevalence and between-study heterogeneity was quantified. Twenty-nine publications (5 cross-sectional studies; 14 prevalencesurveys and 10 field trials) were included in this review. Random effects MA resulted in an overall AR prevalence of 72.0% (95% CI=58.4% to 80.0%). However, a high heterogeneity was observed (I2=55.9%). From studies reporting the nematode genera involved in the AR, Cooperia spp were present in 91.7% of the studies (n=24); Ostertagia sp. in 44.5% (n=22); Haemonchus sp. in 47.8% (n=23); Trichostrongylus sp. in 36.4% (n=22) and Oesophagostomum spp. in 23.8% (n=21). The included cross sectional studies suggested that frequency of treatments, age of cattle and type of management were potential management factors associated with AR in bovine GINs. However, more detailed studies are necessary to fully evaluate management guidelines for implementation of sustainable GIN control strategies.
2018 | |
RUMINANTS PARASITES RESISTANCE ESTABLISHMENT RISK FACTORS META-ANALYSIS |
|
Inglés | |
Instituto Nacional de Investigación Agropecuaria | |
AINFO | |
http://www.ainfo.inia.uy/consulta/busca?b=pc&id=59484&biblioteca=vazio&busca=59484&qFacets=59484 | |
Acceso abierto |
_version_ | 1805580523318280192 |
---|---|
author | MEDEROS, A. |
author2 | CARRACELAS, B. MINHO, A.P. FERNÁNDEZ, S. SÁNCHEZ, J. |
author2_role | author author author author |
author_facet | MEDEROS, A. CARRACELAS, B. MINHO, A.P. FERNÁNDEZ, S. SÁNCHEZ, J. |
author_role | author |
bitstream.checksum.fl_str_mv | 897c749fede9f70b3ac138d665183676 |
bitstream.checksumAlgorithm.fl_str_mv | MD5 |
bitstream.url.fl_str_mv | https://redi.anii.org.uy/jspui/bitstream/20.500.12381/696/1/sword-2022-10-19T17%3a36%3a54.original.xml |
collection | AINFO |
dc.creator.none.fl_str_mv | MEDEROS, A. CARRACELAS, B. MINHO, A.P. FERNÁNDEZ, S. SÁNCHEZ, J. |
dc.date.accessioned.none.fl_str_mv | 2022-10-19T20:36:54Z |
dc.date.available.none.fl_str_mv | 2022-10-19T20:36:54Z |
dc.date.issued.none.fl_str_mv | 2018 |
dc.date.updated.none.fl_str_mv | 2022-10-19T20:36:54Z |
dc.description.abstract.none.fl_txt_mv | A systematic review and meta-analysis was conducted with the aim to measure the prevalence of anthelmintic resistance (AR) in cattle gastrointestinal nematodes (GIN) and potential management factors associated with development of such resistance. A search algorithm was constructed and a comprehensive search of the primaryliterature was conducted in: CAB abstracts (1990-2016), Medline (1860-2016), Agricola (1924-2016) and Lilacs (1985-2016). Prevalence estimates were combined through meta-analysis (MA) using the logit prevalence and between-study heterogeneity was quantified. Twenty-nine publications (5 cross-sectional studies; 14 prevalencesurveys and 10 field trials) were included in this review. Random effects MA resulted in an overall AR prevalence of 72.0% (95% CI=58.4% to 80.0%). However, a high heterogeneity was observed (I2=55.9%). From studies reporting the nematode genera involved in the AR, Cooperia spp were present in 91.7% of the studies (n=24); Ostertagia sp. in 44.5% (n=22); Haemonchus sp. in 47.8% (n=23); Trichostrongylus sp. in 36.4% (n=22) and Oesophagostomum spp. in 23.8% (n=21). The included cross sectional studies suggested that frequency of treatments, age of cattle and type of management were potential management factors associated with AR in bovine GINs. However, more detailed studies are necessary to fully evaluate management guidelines for implementation of sustainable GIN control strategies. |
dc.identifier.none.fl_str_mv | http://www.ainfo.inia.uy/consulta/busca?b=pc&id=59484&biblioteca=vazio&busca=59484&qFacets=59484 |
dc.language.iso.none.fl_str_mv | en eng |
dc.rights.es.fl_str_mv | Acceso abierto |
dc.rights.none.fl_str_mv | info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv | reponame:AINFO instname:Instituto Nacional de Investigación Agropecuaria instacron:Instituto Nacional de Investigación Agropecuaria |
dc.subject.none.fl_str_mv | RUMINANTS PARASITES RESISTANCE ESTABLISHMENT RISK FACTORS META-ANALYSIS |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv | Prevalence and Factors Associated with Anthelmintic Resistance in Gastrointestinal Nematodes of Cattle: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis. |
dc.type.none.fl_str_mv | Article PublishedVersion info:eu-repo/semantics/article |
dc.type.version.none.fl_str_mv | info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion |
description | A systematic review and meta-analysis was conducted with the aim to measure the prevalence of anthelmintic resistance (AR) in cattle gastrointestinal nematodes (GIN) and potential management factors associated with development of such resistance. A search algorithm was constructed and a comprehensive search of the primaryliterature was conducted in: CAB abstracts (1990-2016), Medline (1860-2016), Agricola (1924-2016) and Lilacs (1985-2016). Prevalence estimates were combined through meta-analysis (MA) using the logit prevalence and between-study heterogeneity was quantified. Twenty-nine publications (5 cross-sectional studies; 14 prevalencesurveys and 10 field trials) were included in this review. Random effects MA resulted in an overall AR prevalence of 72.0% (95% CI=58.4% to 80.0%). However, a high heterogeneity was observed (I2=55.9%). From studies reporting the nematode genera involved in the AR, Cooperia spp were present in 91.7% of the studies (n=24); Ostertagia sp. in 44.5% (n=22); Haemonchus sp. in 47.8% (n=23); Trichostrongylus sp. in 36.4% (n=22) and Oesophagostomum spp. in 23.8% (n=21). The included cross sectional studies suggested that frequency of treatments, age of cattle and type of management were potential management factors associated with AR in bovine GINs. However, more detailed studies are necessary to fully evaluate management guidelines for implementation of sustainable GIN control strategies. |
eu_rights_str_mv | openAccess |
format | article |
id | INIAOAI_16899093dd894e78b11abdf2efcf62e9 |
instacron_str | Instituto Nacional de Investigación Agropecuaria |
institution | Instituto Nacional de Investigación Agropecuaria |
instname_str | Instituto Nacional de Investigación Agropecuaria |
language | eng |
language_invalid_str_mv | en |
network_acronym_str | INIAOAI |
network_name_str | AINFO |
oai_identifier_str | oai:redi.anii.org.uy:20.500.12381/696 |
publishDate | 2018 |
reponame_str | AINFO |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv | lorrego@inia.org.uy |
repository.name.fl_str_mv | AINFO - Instituto Nacional de Investigación Agropecuaria |
repository_id_str | |
rights_invalid_str_mv | Acceso abierto |
spelling | 2022-10-19T20:36:54Z2022-10-19T20:36:54Z20182022-10-19T20:36:54Zhttp://www.ainfo.inia.uy/consulta/busca?b=pc&id=59484&biblioteca=vazio&busca=59484&qFacets=59484A systematic review and meta-analysis was conducted with the aim to measure the prevalence of anthelmintic resistance (AR) in cattle gastrointestinal nematodes (GIN) and potential management factors associated with development of such resistance. A search algorithm was constructed and a comprehensive search of the primaryliterature was conducted in: CAB abstracts (1990-2016), Medline (1860-2016), Agricola (1924-2016) and Lilacs (1985-2016). Prevalence estimates were combined through meta-analysis (MA) using the logit prevalence and between-study heterogeneity was quantified. Twenty-nine publications (5 cross-sectional studies; 14 prevalencesurveys and 10 field trials) were included in this review. Random effects MA resulted in an overall AR prevalence of 72.0% (95% CI=58.4% to 80.0%). However, a high heterogeneity was observed (I2=55.9%). From studies reporting the nematode genera involved in the AR, Cooperia spp were present in 91.7% of the studies (n=24); Ostertagia sp. in 44.5% (n=22); Haemonchus sp. in 47.8% (n=23); Trichostrongylus sp. in 36.4% (n=22) and Oesophagostomum spp. in 23.8% (n=21). The included cross sectional studies suggested that frequency of treatments, age of cattle and type of management were potential management factors associated with AR in bovine GINs. However, more detailed studies are necessary to fully evaluate management guidelines for implementation of sustainable GIN control strategies.https://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12381/696enenginfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessAcceso abiertoRUMINANTSPARASITESRESISTANCE ESTABLISHMENTRISK FACTORSMETA-ANALYSISPrevalence and Factors Associated with Anthelmintic Resistance in Gastrointestinal Nematodes of Cattle: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.ArticlePublishedVersioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionreponame:AINFOinstname:Instituto Nacional de Investigación Agropecuariainstacron:Instituto Nacional de Investigación AgropecuariaMEDEROS, A.CARRACELAS, B.MINHO, A.P.FERNÁNDEZ, S.SÁNCHEZ, J.SWORDsword-2022-10-19T17:36:54.original.xmlOriginal SWORD entry documentapplication/octet-stream2652https://redi.anii.org.uy/jspui/bitstream/20.500.12381/696/1/sword-2022-10-19T17%3a36%3a54.original.xml897c749fede9f70b3ac138d665183676MD5120.500.12381/6962022-10-19 17:36:54.832oai:redi.anii.org.uy:20.500.12381/696Gobiernohttp://inia.uyhttps://redi.anii.org.uy/oai/requestlorrego@inia.org.uyUruguayopendoar:2022-10-19T20:36:54AINFO - Instituto Nacional de Investigación Agropecuariafalse |
spellingShingle | Prevalence and Factors Associated with Anthelmintic Resistance in Gastrointestinal Nematodes of Cattle: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis. MEDEROS, A. RUMINANTS PARASITES RESISTANCE ESTABLISHMENT RISK FACTORS META-ANALYSIS |
status_str | publishedVersion |
title | Prevalence and Factors Associated with Anthelmintic Resistance in Gastrointestinal Nematodes of Cattle: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis. |
title_full | Prevalence and Factors Associated with Anthelmintic Resistance in Gastrointestinal Nematodes of Cattle: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis. |
title_fullStr | Prevalence and Factors Associated with Anthelmintic Resistance in Gastrointestinal Nematodes of Cattle: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis. |
title_full_unstemmed | Prevalence and Factors Associated with Anthelmintic Resistance in Gastrointestinal Nematodes of Cattle: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis. |
title_short | Prevalence and Factors Associated with Anthelmintic Resistance in Gastrointestinal Nematodes of Cattle: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis. |
title_sort | Prevalence and Factors Associated with Anthelmintic Resistance in Gastrointestinal Nematodes of Cattle: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis. |
topic | RUMINANTS PARASITES RESISTANCE ESTABLISHMENT RISK FACTORS META-ANALYSIS |
url | http://www.ainfo.inia.uy/consulta/busca?b=pc&id=59484&biblioteca=vazio&busca=59484&qFacets=59484 |