Prevalence and Factors Associated with Anthelmintic Resistance in Gastrointestinal Nematodes of Cattle: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.

MEDEROS, A. - CARRACELAS, B. - MINHO, A.P. - FERNÁNDEZ, S. - SÁNCHEZ, J.

Resumen:

A systematic review and meta-analysis was conducted with the aim to measure the prevalence of anthelmintic resistance (AR) in cattle gastrointestinal nematodes (GIN) and potential management factors associated with development of such resistance. A search algorithm was constructed and a comprehensive search of the primaryliterature was conducted in: CAB abstracts (1990-2016), Medline (1860-2016), Agricola (1924-2016) and Lilacs (1985-2016). Prevalence estimates were combined through meta-analysis (MA) using the logit prevalence and between-study heterogeneity was quantified. Twenty-nine publications (5 cross-sectional studies; 14 prevalencesurveys and 10 field trials) were included in this review. Random effects MA resulted in an overall AR prevalence of 72.0% (95% CI=58.4% to 80.0%). However, a high heterogeneity was observed (I2=55.9%). From studies reporting the nematode genera involved in the AR, Cooperia spp were present in 91.7% of the studies (n=24); Ostertagia sp. in 44.5% (n=22); Haemonchus sp. in 47.8% (n=23); Trichostrongylus sp. in 36.4% (n=22) and Oesophagostomum spp. in 23.8% (n=21). The included cross sectional studies suggested that frequency of treatments, age of cattle and type of management were potential management factors associated with AR in bovine GINs. However, more detailed studies are necessary to fully evaluate management guidelines for implementation of sustainable GIN control strategies.


Detalles Bibliográficos
2018
RUMINANTS
PARASITES
RESISTANCE ESTABLISHMENT
RISK FACTORS
META-ANALYSIS
Inglés
Instituto Nacional de Investigación Agropecuaria
AINFO
http://www.ainfo.inia.uy/consulta/busca?b=pc&id=59484&biblioteca=vazio&busca=59484&qFacets=59484
Acceso abierto
_version_ 1805580523318280192
author MEDEROS, A.
author2 CARRACELAS, B.
MINHO, A.P.
FERNÁNDEZ, S.
SÁNCHEZ, J.
author2_role author
author
author
author
author_facet MEDEROS, A.
CARRACELAS, B.
MINHO, A.P.
FERNÁNDEZ, S.
SÁNCHEZ, J.
author_role author
bitstream.checksum.fl_str_mv 897c749fede9f70b3ac138d665183676
bitstream.checksumAlgorithm.fl_str_mv MD5
bitstream.url.fl_str_mv https://redi.anii.org.uy/jspui/bitstream/20.500.12381/696/1/sword-2022-10-19T17%3a36%3a54.original.xml
collection AINFO
dc.creator.none.fl_str_mv MEDEROS, A.
CARRACELAS, B.
MINHO, A.P.
FERNÁNDEZ, S.
SÁNCHEZ, J.
dc.date.accessioned.none.fl_str_mv 2022-10-19T20:36:54Z
dc.date.available.none.fl_str_mv 2022-10-19T20:36:54Z
dc.date.issued.none.fl_str_mv 2018
dc.date.updated.none.fl_str_mv 2022-10-19T20:36:54Z
dc.description.abstract.none.fl_txt_mv A systematic review and meta-analysis was conducted with the aim to measure the prevalence of anthelmintic resistance (AR) in cattle gastrointestinal nematodes (GIN) and potential management factors associated with development of such resistance. A search algorithm was constructed and a comprehensive search of the primaryliterature was conducted in: CAB abstracts (1990-2016), Medline (1860-2016), Agricola (1924-2016) and Lilacs (1985-2016). Prevalence estimates were combined through meta-analysis (MA) using the logit prevalence and between-study heterogeneity was quantified. Twenty-nine publications (5 cross-sectional studies; 14 prevalencesurveys and 10 field trials) were included in this review. Random effects MA resulted in an overall AR prevalence of 72.0% (95% CI=58.4% to 80.0%). However, a high heterogeneity was observed (I2=55.9%). From studies reporting the nematode genera involved in the AR, Cooperia spp were present in 91.7% of the studies (n=24); Ostertagia sp. in 44.5% (n=22); Haemonchus sp. in 47.8% (n=23); Trichostrongylus sp. in 36.4% (n=22) and Oesophagostomum spp. in 23.8% (n=21). The included cross sectional studies suggested that frequency of treatments, age of cattle and type of management were potential management factors associated with AR in bovine GINs. However, more detailed studies are necessary to fully evaluate management guidelines for implementation of sustainable GIN control strategies.
dc.identifier.none.fl_str_mv http://www.ainfo.inia.uy/consulta/busca?b=pc&id=59484&biblioteca=vazio&busca=59484&qFacets=59484
dc.language.iso.none.fl_str_mv en
eng
dc.rights.es.fl_str_mv Acceso abierto
dc.rights.none.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv reponame:AINFO
instname:Instituto Nacional de Investigación Agropecuaria
instacron:Instituto Nacional de Investigación Agropecuaria
dc.subject.none.fl_str_mv RUMINANTS
PARASITES
RESISTANCE ESTABLISHMENT
RISK FACTORS
META-ANALYSIS
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Prevalence and Factors Associated with Anthelmintic Resistance in Gastrointestinal Nematodes of Cattle: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.
dc.type.none.fl_str_mv Article
PublishedVersion
info:eu-repo/semantics/article
dc.type.version.none.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
description A systematic review and meta-analysis was conducted with the aim to measure the prevalence of anthelmintic resistance (AR) in cattle gastrointestinal nematodes (GIN) and potential management factors associated with development of such resistance. A search algorithm was constructed and a comprehensive search of the primaryliterature was conducted in: CAB abstracts (1990-2016), Medline (1860-2016), Agricola (1924-2016) and Lilacs (1985-2016). Prevalence estimates were combined through meta-analysis (MA) using the logit prevalence and between-study heterogeneity was quantified. Twenty-nine publications (5 cross-sectional studies; 14 prevalencesurveys and 10 field trials) were included in this review. Random effects MA resulted in an overall AR prevalence of 72.0% (95% CI=58.4% to 80.0%). However, a high heterogeneity was observed (I2=55.9%). From studies reporting the nematode genera involved in the AR, Cooperia spp were present in 91.7% of the studies (n=24); Ostertagia sp. in 44.5% (n=22); Haemonchus sp. in 47.8% (n=23); Trichostrongylus sp. in 36.4% (n=22) and Oesophagostomum spp. in 23.8% (n=21). The included cross sectional studies suggested that frequency of treatments, age of cattle and type of management were potential management factors associated with AR in bovine GINs. However, more detailed studies are necessary to fully evaluate management guidelines for implementation of sustainable GIN control strategies.
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
format article
id INIAOAI_16899093dd894e78b11abdf2efcf62e9
instacron_str Instituto Nacional de Investigación Agropecuaria
institution Instituto Nacional de Investigación Agropecuaria
instname_str Instituto Nacional de Investigación Agropecuaria
language eng
language_invalid_str_mv en
network_acronym_str INIAOAI
network_name_str AINFO
oai_identifier_str oai:redi.anii.org.uy:20.500.12381/696
publishDate 2018
reponame_str AINFO
repository.mail.fl_str_mv lorrego@inia.org.uy
repository.name.fl_str_mv AINFO - Instituto Nacional de Investigación Agropecuaria
repository_id_str
rights_invalid_str_mv Acceso abierto
spelling 2022-10-19T20:36:54Z2022-10-19T20:36:54Z20182022-10-19T20:36:54Zhttp://www.ainfo.inia.uy/consulta/busca?b=pc&id=59484&biblioteca=vazio&busca=59484&qFacets=59484A systematic review and meta-analysis was conducted with the aim to measure the prevalence of anthelmintic resistance (AR) in cattle gastrointestinal nematodes (GIN) and potential management factors associated with development of such resistance. A search algorithm was constructed and a comprehensive search of the primaryliterature was conducted in: CAB abstracts (1990-2016), Medline (1860-2016), Agricola (1924-2016) and Lilacs (1985-2016). Prevalence estimates were combined through meta-analysis (MA) using the logit prevalence and between-study heterogeneity was quantified. Twenty-nine publications (5 cross-sectional studies; 14 prevalencesurveys and 10 field trials) were included in this review. Random effects MA resulted in an overall AR prevalence of 72.0% (95% CI=58.4% to 80.0%). However, a high heterogeneity was observed (I2=55.9%). From studies reporting the nematode genera involved in the AR, Cooperia spp were present in 91.7% of the studies (n=24); Ostertagia sp. in 44.5% (n=22); Haemonchus sp. in 47.8% (n=23); Trichostrongylus sp. in 36.4% (n=22) and Oesophagostomum spp. in 23.8% (n=21). The included cross sectional studies suggested that frequency of treatments, age of cattle and type of management were potential management factors associated with AR in bovine GINs. However, more detailed studies are necessary to fully evaluate management guidelines for implementation of sustainable GIN control strategies.https://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12381/696enenginfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessAcceso abiertoRUMINANTSPARASITESRESISTANCE ESTABLISHMENTRISK FACTORSMETA-ANALYSISPrevalence and Factors Associated with Anthelmintic Resistance in Gastrointestinal Nematodes of Cattle: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.ArticlePublishedVersioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionreponame:AINFOinstname:Instituto Nacional de Investigación Agropecuariainstacron:Instituto Nacional de Investigación AgropecuariaMEDEROS, A.CARRACELAS, B.MINHO, A.P.FERNÁNDEZ, S.SÁNCHEZ, J.SWORDsword-2022-10-19T17:36:54.original.xmlOriginal SWORD entry documentapplication/octet-stream2652https://redi.anii.org.uy/jspui/bitstream/20.500.12381/696/1/sword-2022-10-19T17%3a36%3a54.original.xml897c749fede9f70b3ac138d665183676MD5120.500.12381/6962022-10-19 17:36:54.832oai:redi.anii.org.uy:20.500.12381/696Gobiernohttp://inia.uyhttps://redi.anii.org.uy/oai/requestlorrego@inia.org.uyUruguayopendoar:2022-10-19T20:36:54AINFO - Instituto Nacional de Investigación Agropecuariafalse
spellingShingle Prevalence and Factors Associated with Anthelmintic Resistance in Gastrointestinal Nematodes of Cattle: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.
MEDEROS, A.
RUMINANTS
PARASITES
RESISTANCE ESTABLISHMENT
RISK FACTORS
META-ANALYSIS
status_str publishedVersion
title Prevalence and Factors Associated with Anthelmintic Resistance in Gastrointestinal Nematodes of Cattle: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.
title_full Prevalence and Factors Associated with Anthelmintic Resistance in Gastrointestinal Nematodes of Cattle: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.
title_fullStr Prevalence and Factors Associated with Anthelmintic Resistance in Gastrointestinal Nematodes of Cattle: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.
title_full_unstemmed Prevalence and Factors Associated with Anthelmintic Resistance in Gastrointestinal Nematodes of Cattle: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.
title_short Prevalence and Factors Associated with Anthelmintic Resistance in Gastrointestinal Nematodes of Cattle: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.
title_sort Prevalence and Factors Associated with Anthelmintic Resistance in Gastrointestinal Nematodes of Cattle: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.
topic RUMINANTS
PARASITES
RESISTANCE ESTABLISHMENT
RISK FACTORS
META-ANALYSIS
url http://www.ainfo.inia.uy/consulta/busca?b=pc&id=59484&biblioteca=vazio&busca=59484&qFacets=59484