Assessing the effect of public funding on private innovation investment in Uruguay
Resumen:
Despite the recent research efforts and methodological improvements, empirical evidence on the additionality effects of public innovation programs shows heterogeneous results by firm, sector, country and type of innovation. This paper assesses input additionality of public funding on private innovative investment of Uruguayan firms by applying a longitudinal analysis from 2001 to 2012. During this period, there was a dramatic increase of public innovation funds. However, the number of innovative firms remains stable and the amount of public funding for innovation at firm level is still very low. In this context, previous innovation experience appears as the most significant determinant of access to public innovation support. Moreover, we find evidence of a moderate substitution effect between public and private funds. We analyzed heterogeneous effects according to type of innovation, finding significant effects only for innovation based on acquisition of artifacts (embodied). We conclude on the main challenges of the current policy mix in Uruguay, stressing the relevance of further research lines on behavioral additionality to contribute to improve policy results.
A pesar de los recientes esfuerzos en investigación y los avances metodológicos, la evidencia empírica sobre los efectos de adicionalidad de los programas públicos de apoyo a la innovación muestra resultados heterogéneos según firmas, sectores, países y tipos de innovación. Este trabajo analiza la adicionalidad del financiamiento público sobre la inversión privada en innovación de las empresas uruguayas aplicando un análisis longitudinal para el período 2001-2012. Durante este lapso de tiempo, los fondos públicos de apoyo a la innovación se incrementaron dramáticamente. Sin embargo, el número de firmas innovadoras permanece estable y los montos de apoyo público por firma continúan siendo muy bajos. En este contexto, contar con experiencia previa en actividades de innovación parece ser el determinante fundamental del acceso al financiamiento público. Además, se encuentra evidencia de un moderado grado de sustitución entre fondos públicos y privados. Analizamos efectos heterogéneos entre tipos de innovación, encontrando efectos significativos solamente para las actividades de innovación basadas en la adquisición de artefactos (incorporada). Concluimos sobre los principales desafíos del conjunto de políticas en Uruguay, enfatizando la importancia de más investigación sobre la adicionalidad comportamental para mejorar los resultados de la política pública.
2017 | |
Public funding Input additionality Innovation survey Financiamiento público Adicionalidad Encuestas de innovación FINANCIAMIENTO DE EMPRESAS |
|
Inglés | |
Universidad de la República | |
COLIBRI | |
http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12008/18978 | |
Acceso abierto | |
Licencia Creative Commons Atribución – No Comercial – Sin Derivadas (CC - By-NC-ND) |
Sumario: | Despite the recent research efforts and methodological improvements, empirical evidence on the additionality effects of public innovation programs shows heterogeneous results by firm, sector, country and type of innovation. This paper assesses input additionality of public funding on private innovative investment of Uruguayan firms by applying a longitudinal analysis from 2001 to 2012. During this period, there was a dramatic increase of public innovation funds. However, the number of innovative firms remains stable and the amount of public funding for innovation at firm level is still very low. In this context, previous innovation experience appears as the most significant determinant of access to public innovation support. Moreover, we find evidence of a moderate substitution effect between public and private funds. We analyzed heterogeneous effects according to type of innovation, finding significant effects only for innovation based on acquisition of artifacts (embodied). We conclude on the main challenges of the current policy mix in Uruguay, stressing the relevance of further research lines on behavioral additionality to contribute to improve policy results. |
---|