Subjective well-being and adaptation. The case of Uruguay
Resumen:
We assess the recent evolution of the quality of life in Uruguay, analysing whether current subjective well-being levels are conditioned by the objective well-being trajectory of each individual. We explore subjective well-being in three domains: life, economic situation and housing satisfaction. Although adaptation has been addressed in the empirical literature for developed countries, there is scarce evidence for developing countries due to the lack of suitable panel datasets. In this article, we provide an econometric test of the adaptation hypothesis based on longitudinal data from Uruguay for the years 2004, 2006 and 2011/12 (Estudio Longitudinal de Bienestar en Uruguay). Our main findings show that present levels of life, economic and housing satisfaction are each positively correlated with the corresponding contemporary and lagged objective variable of interest. Thus, we reject the adaptation hypothesis in all the dimensions considered. We also explore the role of social interactions in the three subjective well-being dimensions. Average objective well-being of the reference group (either income or crowding) is not associated with individual subjective well-being levels. However, life satisfaction is positively correlated with the average subjective well-being of the reference group.
Evaluamos la evolución reciente de la calidad de vida en Uruguay, analizando si los niveles de bienestar subjetivo están condicionados por la trayectoria objetiva del bienestar de cada individuo. Exploramos el bienestar subjetivo en tres dominios: vida, situación económica y satisfacción con la vivienda. Aunque la adaptación se ha abordado en la literatura empírica para los países desarrollados, debido a la falta de conjuntos de datos de panel adecuados existe escasa evidencia para los países en desarrollo. En este artículo, proporcionamos una prueba econométrica de la hipótesis de adaptación basada en datos longitudinales de Uruguay para los años 2004, 2006 y 2011/12 (Estudio Longitudinal de Bienestar en Uruguay). Nuestros principales hallazgos muestran que la satisfacción con los niveles de vida, la situación económica y la vivienda están correlacionados positivamente con la correspondiente variable objetiva de interés contemporánea y rezagada. Por lo tanto, rechazamos la hipótesis de adaptación en todas las dimensiones consideradas. También exploramos el papel de las interacciones sociales en las tres dimensiones del bienestar subjetivo. El bienestar objetivo promedio del grupo de referencia (ya sea ingreso o hacinamiento) no está asociado con los niveles de bienestar subjetivo individual. Sin embargo, la satisfacción con la vida está correlacionada positivamente con el bienestar subjetivo promedio del grupo de referencia.
2017 | |
Adaptation Subjective well-being Adaptive preferences Uruguay Adaptación Bienestar subjetivo Preferencias adaptativas POBREZA BIENESTAR |
|
Inglés | |
Universidad de la República | |
COLIBRI | |
https://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12008/29808 | |
Acceso abierto | |
Licencia Creative Commons Atribución - No Comercial - Sin Derivadas (CC - By-NC-ND 4.0) |
Sumario: | We assess the recent evolution of the quality of life in Uruguay, analysing whether current subjective well-being levels are conditioned by the objective well-being trajectory of each individual. We explore subjective well-being in three domains: life, economic situation and housing satisfaction. Although adaptation has been addressed in the empirical literature for developed countries, there is scarce evidence for developing countries due to the lack of suitable panel datasets. In this article, we provide an econometric test of the adaptation hypothesis based on longitudinal data from Uruguay for the years 2004, 2006 and 2011/12 (Estudio Longitudinal de Bienestar en Uruguay). Our main findings show that present levels of life, economic and housing satisfaction are each positively correlated with the corresponding contemporary and lagged objective variable of interest. Thus, we reject the adaptation hypothesis in all the dimensions considered. We also explore the role of social interactions in the three subjective well-being dimensions. Average objective well-being of the reference group (either income or crowding) is not associated with individual subjective well-being levels. However, life satisfaction is positively correlated with the average subjective well-being of the reference group. |
---|