Effect of irrigation and grazing on the production of an alfalfa pasture (Medicago sativa L.)

Efecto del riego y el pastoreo sobre la producción de una pastura de alfalfa (Medicago sativa L.)

Efeito da irrigação e do pastoreio na produção de pastagem de alfafa (Medicago sativa L.)

Puppo, Lucía - Hayashi, Raquel - Beretta, Andrés - Morales, Pablo

Editor(es): Reyno, Rafael

Resumen:

Alfalfa is a forage species widely used in Uruguay in intensive livestock and dairy farming. Supplementary irrigation makes it possible to mitigate the negative effects of climate change, increasing and stabilizing the productivity of pastures. It is necessary to evaluate its joint effect with grazing. Two irrigation thresholds were evaluated, with entry of animals. The treatments were: frequent irrigation (30% depleted), spaced irrigation (65% depleted) and rainfed. The experimental design was complete randomized blocks, and 30 months of evaluation. The average annual yield of irrigated alfalfa was 25,333 and 23,177 kg DM ha-1, first and second year of evaluation, respectively. The accumulated production (30 months) did not show a significant difference between the irrigated treatments, but it did between irrigated and rainfed. In the last summer-autumn, the yield of all treatments fell to 8660 kg DM ha-1 (irrigated) and 1756 kg DM ha-1 (rainfed). Seasonal productivity indicates the convenience of irrigating alfalfa in summer since the yield increased 43% in the second year and 4.3 times more in the last year. Furthermore, after the extreme summer drought, in the following autumn, the irrigated treatments yielded 7 times more than the rainfed. Management with spaced irrigation and irrigation depth that do not return the soil to its field capacity increases the effectiveness of precipitation, saving water and energy allocated to irrigation. The apparent density increased towards the end of the experiment as a result of grazing, however, there was no difference between the evaluated irrigation managements.


La alfalfa es una especie forrajera muy utilizada en Uruguay en ganadería intensiva y lechería. El riego suplementario permite mitigar los efectos negativos del cambio climático, aumentando y estabilizando la productividad de las pasturas. Es necesario evaluar su efecto conjunto con el pastoreo. Se evaluaron dos umbrales de riego, con entrada de animales. Los tratamientos fueron: riego frecuente (30% agotamiento), riego espaciado (65% agotamiento) y secano. El diseño experimental fue de bloques completos al azar, 30 meses de evaluación. La productividad promedio anual de la alfalfa regada fue de 25333 y 23177 kg MS ha-1, primer y segundo año de evaluación, respectivamente. La producción acumulada (30 meses) no mostró diferencia significativa entre los tratamientos regados, pero sí entre regados y secano. En el último verano-otoño, la productividad de todos los tratamientos cae a 8660 kg MS ha-1 (regados) y 1756 kg MS ha-1 (secano). Las productividades estacionales indican la conveniencia de regar la alfalfa en verano, ya que el rendimiento aumentó 43% en el segundo año y 4,3 veces más en el último año. Además, luego de transcurrir la sequía extrema del verano, en el otoño siguiente los regados rindieron 7 veces más que el secano. El manejo con riegos espaciados y láminas de riego que no devuelven el suelo a su capacidad de campo aumenta la efectividad de las precipitaciones, ahorrando agua y energía destinada al riego. La densidad aparente aumentó hacia el final del experimento a consecuencia del pastoreo, sin embargo, no hubo diferencia entre los manejos de riego evaluados.


A alfafa é uma espécie forrageira amplamente utilizada no Uruguai na pecuária intensiva e na pecuária leiteira. A irrigação complementar permite mitigar os efeitos negativos das alterações climáticas, aumentando e estabilizando a produtividade das pastagens. É necessário avaliar seu efeito conjunto com o pastoreio. Foram avaliados dois limiares de irrigação, com entrada de animais. Os tratamentos foram: irrigação frequente (esgotamento de 30%), irrigação espaçada (esgotamento de 65%) e sequeiro. O delineamento experimental foi blocos completos casualizados, 30 meses de avaliação. A produtividade média anual da alfafa irrigada foi de 25.333 e 23.177 kg MS ha-1, primeiro e segundo ano de avaliação respectivamente. A produção acumulada (30 meses) não apresentou diferença significativa entre os tratamentos irrigados, mas sim entre irrigado e sequeiro. No último verão-outono, a produtividade de todos os tratamentos cai para 8.660 kg MS ha-1 (irrigado) e 1.756 kg MS ha-1 (irrigado). A produtividade sazonal indica a conveniência de irrigar alfafa no verão, já que a produtividade aumentou 43% no segundo ano e 4.3 vezes mais no último ano. Além disso, depois de passada a seca extrema do Verão, no Outono seguinte a terra irrigada rendeu 7 vezes mais do que a terra seca. Manejo com irrigação espaçada e lâminas de irrigação que não devolvem o solo à sua capacidade de campo, aumentam a eficácia da precipitação, economizando água e energia para irrigação. A densidade aparente aumentou ao final do experimento em decorrência do pastejo, porém não houve diferença entre os manejos de irrigação avaliados.


Detalles Bibliográficos
2024
Forage Productivity
Irrigação de Pastagens
Irrigation Threshold
Limite de Irrigação
Pasture Irrigation
Productividad Forraje
Produtividade Forrageira
Riego Pasturas
Umbral de Riego
Inglés
Universidad de la República
COLIBRI
https://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12008/44816
Acceso abierto
Licencia Creative Commons Atribución (CC - By 4.0)
_version_ 1807523265463189504
author Puppo, Lucía
author2 Hayashi, Raquel
Beretta, Andrés
Morales, Pablo
author2_role author
author
author
author_facet Puppo, Lucía
Hayashi, Raquel
Beretta, Andrés
Morales, Pablo
author_role author
bitstream.checksum.fl_str_mv 6429389a7df7277b72b7924fdc7d47a9
a0ebbeafb9d2ec7cbb19d7137ebc392c
a34a400dd0046b3aef60f72471c4f991
71ed42ef0a0b648670f707320be37b90
5dd71c8e4ee0b699ea54cf762351a63e
bitstream.checksumAlgorithm.fl_str_mv MD5
MD5
MD5
MD5
MD5
bitstream.url.fl_str_mv http://localhost:8080/xmlui/bitstream/20.500.12008/44816/5/license.txt
http://localhost:8080/xmlui/bitstream/20.500.12008/44816/2/license_url
http://localhost:8080/xmlui/bitstream/20.500.12008/44816/3/license_text
http://localhost:8080/xmlui/bitstream/20.500.12008/44816/4/license_rdf
http://localhost:8080/xmlui/bitstream/20.500.12008/44816/1/2730-5066--1422.pdf
collection COLIBRI
dc.contributor.filiacion.none.fl_str_mv Puppo Lucía, Universidad de la República, Facultad de Agronomía, Departamento de Suelos y Aguas, Montevideo, Uruguay https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1245-8433
Hayashi Raquel, Universidad de la República, Facultad de Agronomía, Departamento de Suelos y Aguas, Montevideo, Uruguay https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6662-716X
Beretta Andrés, Ministerio de Ganadería, Agricultura y Pesca, Dirección General de Recursos Naturales, Montevideo, Uruguay https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1358-2065
Morales Pablo, Universidad de la República, Facultad de Agronomía, Departamento de Suelos y Aguas, Montevideo, Uruguay https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9445-8909
dc.creator.editor.none.fl_str_mv Reyno, Rafael
dc.creator.none.fl_str_mv Puppo, Lucía
Hayashi, Raquel
Beretta, Andrés
Morales, Pablo
dc.date.accessioned.none.fl_str_mv 2024-07-17T21:03:25Z
dc.date.available.none.fl_str_mv 2024-07-17T21:03:25Z
dc.date.issued.none.fl_str_mv 2024
dc.description.abstract.none.fl_txt_mv Alfalfa is a forage species widely used in Uruguay in intensive livestock and dairy farming. Supplementary irrigation makes it possible to mitigate the negative effects of climate change, increasing and stabilizing the productivity of pastures. It is necessary to evaluate its joint effect with grazing. Two irrigation thresholds were evaluated, with entry of animals. The treatments were: frequent irrigation (30% depleted), spaced irrigation (65% depleted) and rainfed. The experimental design was complete randomized blocks, and 30 months of evaluation. The average annual yield of irrigated alfalfa was 25,333 and 23,177 kg DM ha-1, first and second year of evaluation, respectively. The accumulated production (30 months) did not show a significant difference between the irrigated treatments, but it did between irrigated and rainfed. In the last summer-autumn, the yield of all treatments fell to 8660 kg DM ha-1 (irrigated) and 1756 kg DM ha-1 (rainfed). Seasonal productivity indicates the convenience of irrigating alfalfa in summer since the yield increased 43% in the second year and 4.3 times more in the last year. Furthermore, after the extreme summer drought, in the following autumn, the irrigated treatments yielded 7 times more than the rainfed. Management with spaced irrigation and irrigation depth that do not return the soil to its field capacity increases the effectiveness of precipitation, saving water and energy allocated to irrigation. The apparent density increased towards the end of the experiment as a result of grazing, however, there was no difference between the evaluated irrigation managements.
La alfalfa es una especie forrajera muy utilizada en Uruguay en ganadería intensiva y lechería. El riego suplementario permite mitigar los efectos negativos del cambio climático, aumentando y estabilizando la productividad de las pasturas. Es necesario evaluar su efecto conjunto con el pastoreo. Se evaluaron dos umbrales de riego, con entrada de animales. Los tratamientos fueron: riego frecuente (30% agotamiento), riego espaciado (65% agotamiento) y secano. El diseño experimental fue de bloques completos al azar, 30 meses de evaluación. La productividad promedio anual de la alfalfa regada fue de 25333 y 23177 kg MS ha-1, primer y segundo año de evaluación, respectivamente. La producción acumulada (30 meses) no mostró diferencia significativa entre los tratamientos regados, pero sí entre regados y secano. En el último verano-otoño, la productividad de todos los tratamientos cae a 8660 kg MS ha-1 (regados) y 1756 kg MS ha-1 (secano). Las productividades estacionales indican la conveniencia de regar la alfalfa en verano, ya que el rendimiento aumentó 43% en el segundo año y 4,3 veces más en el último año. Además, luego de transcurrir la sequía extrema del verano, en el otoño siguiente los regados rindieron 7 veces más que el secano. El manejo con riegos espaciados y láminas de riego que no devuelven el suelo a su capacidad de campo aumenta la efectividad de las precipitaciones, ahorrando agua y energía destinada al riego. La densidad aparente aumentó hacia el final del experimento a consecuencia del pastoreo, sin embargo, no hubo diferencia entre los manejos de riego evaluados.
A alfafa é uma espécie forrageira amplamente utilizada no Uruguai na pecuária intensiva e na pecuária leiteira. A irrigação complementar permite mitigar os efeitos negativos das alterações climáticas, aumentando e estabilizando a produtividade das pastagens. É necessário avaliar seu efeito conjunto com o pastoreio. Foram avaliados dois limiares de irrigação, com entrada de animais. Os tratamentos foram: irrigação frequente (esgotamento de 30%), irrigação espaçada (esgotamento de 65%) e sequeiro. O delineamento experimental foi blocos completos casualizados, 30 meses de avaliação. A produtividade média anual da alfafa irrigada foi de 25.333 e 23.177 kg MS ha-1, primeiro e segundo ano de avaliação respectivamente. A produção acumulada (30 meses) não apresentou diferença significativa entre os tratamentos irrigados, mas sim entre irrigado e sequeiro. No último verão-outono, a produtividade de todos os tratamentos cai para 8.660 kg MS ha-1 (irrigado) e 1.756 kg MS ha-1 (irrigado). A produtividade sazonal indica a conveniência de irrigar alfafa no verão, já que a produtividade aumentou 43% no segundo ano e 4.3 vezes mais no último ano. Além disso, depois de passada a seca extrema do Verão, no Outono seguinte a terra irrigada rendeu 7 vezes mais do que a terra seca. Manejo com irrigação espaçada e lâminas de irrigação que não devolvem o solo à sua capacidade de campo, aumentam a eficácia da precipitação, economizando água e energia para irrigação. A densidade aparente aumentou ao final do experimento em decorrência do pastejo, porém não houve diferença entre os manejos de irrigação avaliados.
dc.format.extent.es.fl_str_mv e1422
dc.format.mimetype.es.fl_str_mv application/pdf
dc.identifier.citation.es.fl_str_mv Puppo, L., Hayashi, R., Beretta, A. y otros. "Effect of irrigation and grazing on the production of an alfalfa pasture (Medicago sativa L.)". Agrociencia Uruguay [en línea]. 2024, 28, e1422. Doi: 10.31285/AGRO.28.1422.
dc.identifier.doi.none.fl_str_mv 10.31285/AGRO.28.1422
dc.identifier.issn.none.fl_str_mv 2730-5066
dc.identifier.uri.none.fl_str_mv https://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12008/44816
dc.language.iso.none.fl_str_mv en
eng
dc.publisher.es.fl_str_mv Facultad de Agronomía, Universidad de la República - INIA
dc.relation.ispartof.es.fl_str_mv Agrociencia Uruguay, 2024 28:e1422
dc.rights.license.none.fl_str_mv Licencia Creative Commons Atribución (CC - By 4.0)
dc.rights.none.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv reponame:COLIBRI
instname:Universidad de la República
instacron:Universidad de la República
dc.subject.es.fl_str_mv Forage Productivity
Irrigação de Pastagens
Irrigation Threshold
Limite de Irrigação
Pasture Irrigation
Productividad Forraje
Produtividade Forrageira
Riego Pasturas
Umbral de Riego
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Effect of irrigation and grazing on the production of an alfalfa pasture (Medicago sativa L.)
Efecto del riego y el pastoreo sobre la producción de una pastura de alfalfa (Medicago sativa L.)
Efeito da irrigação e do pastoreio na produção de pastagem de alfafa (Medicago sativa L.)
dc.type.es.fl_str_mv Artículo
dc.type.none.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
dc.type.version.none.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
description Alfalfa is a forage species widely used in Uruguay in intensive livestock and dairy farming. Supplementary irrigation makes it possible to mitigate the negative effects of climate change, increasing and stabilizing the productivity of pastures. It is necessary to evaluate its joint effect with grazing. Two irrigation thresholds were evaluated, with entry of animals. The treatments were: frequent irrigation (30% depleted), spaced irrigation (65% depleted) and rainfed. The experimental design was complete randomized blocks, and 30 months of evaluation. The average annual yield of irrigated alfalfa was 25,333 and 23,177 kg DM ha-1, first and second year of evaluation, respectively. The accumulated production (30 months) did not show a significant difference between the irrigated treatments, but it did between irrigated and rainfed. In the last summer-autumn, the yield of all treatments fell to 8660 kg DM ha-1 (irrigated) and 1756 kg DM ha-1 (rainfed). Seasonal productivity indicates the convenience of irrigating alfalfa in summer since the yield increased 43% in the second year and 4.3 times more in the last year. Furthermore, after the extreme summer drought, in the following autumn, the irrigated treatments yielded 7 times more than the rainfed. Management with spaced irrigation and irrigation depth that do not return the soil to its field capacity increases the effectiveness of precipitation, saving water and energy allocated to irrigation. The apparent density increased towards the end of the experiment as a result of grazing, however, there was no difference between the evaluated irrigation managements.
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
format article
id COLIBRI_5999060d48671a0b5c7731360a071bd6
identifier_str_mv Puppo, L., Hayashi, R., Beretta, A. y otros. "Effect of irrigation and grazing on the production of an alfalfa pasture (Medicago sativa L.)". Agrociencia Uruguay [en línea]. 2024, 28, e1422. Doi: 10.31285/AGRO.28.1422.
2730-5066
10.31285/AGRO.28.1422
instacron_str Universidad de la República
institution Universidad de la República
instname_str Universidad de la República
language eng
language_invalid_str_mv en
network_acronym_str COLIBRI
network_name_str COLIBRI
oai_identifier_str oai:colibri.udelar.edu.uy:20.500.12008/44816
publishDate 2024
reponame_str COLIBRI
repository.mail.fl_str_mv mabel.seroubian@seciu.edu.uy
repository.name.fl_str_mv COLIBRI - Universidad de la República
repository_id_str 4771
rights_invalid_str_mv Licencia Creative Commons Atribución (CC - By 4.0)
spelling Puppo Lucía, Universidad de la República, Facultad de Agronomía, Departamento de Suelos y Aguas, Montevideo, Uruguay https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1245-8433Hayashi Raquel, Universidad de la República, Facultad de Agronomía, Departamento de Suelos y Aguas, Montevideo, Uruguay https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6662-716XBeretta Andrés, Ministerio de Ganadería, Agricultura y Pesca, Dirección General de Recursos Naturales, Montevideo, Uruguay https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1358-2065Morales Pablo, Universidad de la República, Facultad de Agronomía, Departamento de Suelos y Aguas, Montevideo, Uruguay https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9445-89092024-07-17T21:03:25Z2024-07-17T21:03:25Z2024Puppo, L., Hayashi, R., Beretta, A. y otros. "Effect of irrigation and grazing on the production of an alfalfa pasture (Medicago sativa L.)". Agrociencia Uruguay [en línea]. 2024, 28, e1422. Doi: 10.31285/AGRO.28.1422.2730-5066https://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12008/4481610.31285/AGRO.28.1422Alfalfa is a forage species widely used in Uruguay in intensive livestock and dairy farming. Supplementary irrigation makes it possible to mitigate the negative effects of climate change, increasing and stabilizing the productivity of pastures. It is necessary to evaluate its joint effect with grazing. Two irrigation thresholds were evaluated, with entry of animals. The treatments were: frequent irrigation (30% depleted), spaced irrigation (65% depleted) and rainfed. The experimental design was complete randomized blocks, and 30 months of evaluation. The average annual yield of irrigated alfalfa was 25,333 and 23,177 kg DM ha-1, first and second year of evaluation, respectively. The accumulated production (30 months) did not show a significant difference between the irrigated treatments, but it did between irrigated and rainfed. In the last summer-autumn, the yield of all treatments fell to 8660 kg DM ha-1 (irrigated) and 1756 kg DM ha-1 (rainfed). Seasonal productivity indicates the convenience of irrigating alfalfa in summer since the yield increased 43% in the second year and 4.3 times more in the last year. Furthermore, after the extreme summer drought, in the following autumn, the irrigated treatments yielded 7 times more than the rainfed. Management with spaced irrigation and irrigation depth that do not return the soil to its field capacity increases the effectiveness of precipitation, saving water and energy allocated to irrigation. The apparent density increased towards the end of the experiment as a result of grazing, however, there was no difference between the evaluated irrigation managements.La alfalfa es una especie forrajera muy utilizada en Uruguay en ganadería intensiva y lechería. El riego suplementario permite mitigar los efectos negativos del cambio climático, aumentando y estabilizando la productividad de las pasturas. Es necesario evaluar su efecto conjunto con el pastoreo. Se evaluaron dos umbrales de riego, con entrada de animales. Los tratamientos fueron: riego frecuente (30% agotamiento), riego espaciado (65% agotamiento) y secano. El diseño experimental fue de bloques completos al azar, 30 meses de evaluación. La productividad promedio anual de la alfalfa regada fue de 25333 y 23177 kg MS ha-1, primer y segundo año de evaluación, respectivamente. La producción acumulada (30 meses) no mostró diferencia significativa entre los tratamientos regados, pero sí entre regados y secano. En el último verano-otoño, la productividad de todos los tratamientos cae a 8660 kg MS ha-1 (regados) y 1756 kg MS ha-1 (secano). Las productividades estacionales indican la conveniencia de regar la alfalfa en verano, ya que el rendimiento aumentó 43% en el segundo año y 4,3 veces más en el último año. Además, luego de transcurrir la sequía extrema del verano, en el otoño siguiente los regados rindieron 7 veces más que el secano. El manejo con riegos espaciados y láminas de riego que no devuelven el suelo a su capacidad de campo aumenta la efectividad de las precipitaciones, ahorrando agua y energía destinada al riego. La densidad aparente aumentó hacia el final del experimento a consecuencia del pastoreo, sin embargo, no hubo diferencia entre los manejos de riego evaluados.A alfafa é uma espécie forrageira amplamente utilizada no Uruguai na pecuária intensiva e na pecuária leiteira. A irrigação complementar permite mitigar os efeitos negativos das alterações climáticas, aumentando e estabilizando a produtividade das pastagens. É necessário avaliar seu efeito conjunto com o pastoreio. Foram avaliados dois limiares de irrigação, com entrada de animais. Os tratamentos foram: irrigação frequente (esgotamento de 30%), irrigação espaçada (esgotamento de 65%) e sequeiro. O delineamento experimental foi blocos completos casualizados, 30 meses de avaliação. A produtividade média anual da alfafa irrigada foi de 25.333 e 23.177 kg MS ha-1, primeiro e segundo ano de avaliação respectivamente. A produção acumulada (30 meses) não apresentou diferença significativa entre os tratamentos irrigados, mas sim entre irrigado e sequeiro. No último verão-outono, a produtividade de todos os tratamentos cai para 8.660 kg MS ha-1 (irrigado) e 1.756 kg MS ha-1 (irrigado). A produtividade sazonal indica a conveniência de irrigar alfafa no verão, já que a produtividade aumentou 43% no segundo ano e 4.3 vezes mais no último ano. Além disso, depois de passada a seca extrema do Verão, no Outono seguinte a terra irrigada rendeu 7 vezes mais do que a terra seca. Manejo com irrigação espaçada e lâminas de irrigação que não devolvem o solo à sua capacidade de campo, aumentam a eficácia da precipitação, economizando água e energia para irrigação. A densidade aparente aumentou ao final do experimento em decorrência do pastejo, porém não houve diferença entre os manejos de irrigação avaliados.Submitted by Colombo Cabanas Stephanie (colombo@fagro.edu.uy) on 2024-07-17T14:30:37Z No. of bitstreams: 2 license_rdf: 24251 bytes, checksum: 71ed42ef0a0b648670f707320be37b90 (MD5) 2730-5066--1422.pdf: 846659 bytes, checksum: 5dd71c8e4ee0b699ea54cf762351a63e (MD5)Approved for entry into archive by Muniz Andrea (rosmeri8@hotmail.com) on 2024-07-17T17:54:31Z (GMT) No. of bitstreams: 2 license_rdf: 24251 bytes, checksum: 71ed42ef0a0b648670f707320be37b90 (MD5) 2730-5066--1422.pdf: 846659 bytes, checksum: 5dd71c8e4ee0b699ea54cf762351a63e (MD5)Made available in DSpace by Seroubian Mabel (mabel.seroubian@seciu.edu.uy) on 2024-07-17T21:03:25Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 2 license_rdf: 24251 bytes, checksum: 71ed42ef0a0b648670f707320be37b90 (MD5) 2730-5066--1422.pdf: 846659 bytes, checksum: 5dd71c8e4ee0b699ea54cf762351a63e (MD5) Previous issue date: 2024e1422application/pdfenengFacultad de Agronomía, Universidad de la República - INIAAgrociencia Uruguay, 2024 28:e1422Las obras depositadas en el Repositorio se rigen por la Ordenanza de los Derechos de la Propiedad Intelectual de la Universidad de la República.(Res. Nº 91 de C.D.C. de 8/III/1994 – D.O. 7/IV/1994) y por la Ordenanza del Repositorio Abierto de la Universidad de la República (Res. Nº 16 de C.D.C. de 07/10/2014)info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessLicencia Creative Commons Atribución (CC - By 4.0)Forage ProductivityIrrigação de PastagensIrrigation ThresholdLimite de IrrigaçãoPasture IrrigationProductividad ForrajeProdutividade ForrageiraRiego PasturasUmbral de RiegoEffect of irrigation and grazing on the production of an alfalfa pasture (Medicago sativa L.)Efecto del riego y el pastoreo sobre la producción de una pastura de alfalfa (Medicago sativa L.)Efeito da irrigação e do pastoreio na produção de pastagem de alfafa (Medicago sativa L.)Artículoinfo:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionreponame:COLIBRIinstname:Universidad de la Repúblicainstacron:Universidad de la RepúblicaPuppo, LucíaHayashi, RaquelBeretta, AndrésMorales, PabloReyno, RafaelLICENSElicense.txtlicense.txttext/plain; charset=utf-84267http://localhost:8080/xmlui/bitstream/20.500.12008/44816/5/license.txt6429389a7df7277b72b7924fdc7d47a9MD55CC-LICENSElicense_urllicense_urltext/plain; charset=utf-844http://localhost:8080/xmlui/bitstream/20.500.12008/44816/2/license_urla0ebbeafb9d2ec7cbb19d7137ebc392cMD52license_textlicense_texttext/html; charset=utf-820496http://localhost:8080/xmlui/bitstream/20.500.12008/44816/3/license_texta34a400dd0046b3aef60f72471c4f991MD53license_rdflicense_rdfapplication/rdf+xml; charset=utf-824251http://localhost:8080/xmlui/bitstream/20.500.12008/44816/4/license_rdf71ed42ef0a0b648670f707320be37b90MD54ORIGINAL2730-5066--1422.pdf2730-5066--1422.pdfapplication/pdf846659http://localhost:8080/xmlui/bitstream/20.500.12008/44816/1/2730-5066--1422.pdf5dd71c8e4ee0b699ea54cf762351a63eMD5120.500.12008/448162024-07-17 18:03:25.334oai:colibri.udelar.edu.uy:20.500.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Universidadhttps://udelar.edu.uy/https://www.colibri.udelar.edu.uy/oai/requestmabel.seroubian@seciu.edu.uyUruguayopendoar:47712024-07-25T14:47:59.154370COLIBRI - Universidad de la Repúblicafalse
spellingShingle Effect of irrigation and grazing on the production of an alfalfa pasture (Medicago sativa L.)
Puppo, Lucía
Forage Productivity
Irrigação de Pastagens
Irrigation Threshold
Limite de Irrigação
Pasture Irrigation
Productividad Forraje
Produtividade Forrageira
Riego Pasturas
Umbral de Riego
status_str publishedVersion
title Effect of irrigation and grazing on the production of an alfalfa pasture (Medicago sativa L.)
title_full Effect of irrigation and grazing on the production of an alfalfa pasture (Medicago sativa L.)
title_fullStr Effect of irrigation and grazing on the production of an alfalfa pasture (Medicago sativa L.)
title_full_unstemmed Effect of irrigation and grazing on the production of an alfalfa pasture (Medicago sativa L.)
title_short Effect of irrigation and grazing on the production of an alfalfa pasture (Medicago sativa L.)
title_sort Effect of irrigation and grazing on the production of an alfalfa pasture (Medicago sativa L.)
topic Forage Productivity
Irrigação de Pastagens
Irrigation Threshold
Limite de Irrigação
Pasture Irrigation
Productividad Forraje
Produtividade Forrageira
Riego Pasturas
Umbral de Riego
url https://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12008/44816